Amph
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3248
Merit: 1070
|
|
August 06, 2014, 06:24:19 AM |
|
next time limit the total hash also, we know that those type of coins can't rise above 8 giga or something
limit it to 10G nethash
|
|
|
|
ASICrefugee
|
|
August 06, 2014, 07:06:39 AM |
|
On the MaxMiners pool mtrader_habana1 mtrader_bomflash1 Need to sort that shit out now - get caught gaming the system like that and BOTH accounts should be banned from mining Fuck me, just check the round stats for block 1008- what about this?? 42 HarryPc21 64 0 0.00 49 HarryPc22 64 0 0.00 173 HarryPc23 24 0 0.00 203 HarryPc24 20 0 0.00 145 HarryPc25 32 0 0.00 71 HarryPc26 52 0 0.00 NOT really a fair distribution, or am I missing something obvious?
|
|
|
|
orgi666
|
|
August 06, 2014, 08:00:52 AM |
|
It was dead before launch,this was meant as BIG PROFIT FOR POOLS.Fuck this coin and anything similiar.
Lol, what? Don't try to FUD this. I think this is a great initiative. No instamine with huge rigs = no big dumps after launch on exchange. Bullshit,cryptocurrency has to be controlled by the comunity,pools are like banks.... Solo miners are the only way to keep coins free,without control of a small group of people.If the trend of early sources and no wallets goes on,people will stop mining.There are several coins every day,most of them are dead before launch.Because of stupidity of the devs.This one will be dead right after the end of POW.Everyone will dump..... Hands away.
|
|
|
|
belief
|
|
August 06, 2014, 08:17:14 AM |
|
debate is a good thing, this coin works .. good coin
|
|
|
|
nongdanvoz
Member
Offline
Activity: 93
Merit: 10
|
|
August 06, 2014, 08:25:51 AM |
|
Fuck
|
|
|
|
orgi666
|
|
August 06, 2014, 08:26:12 AM |
|
Anyway,this is X15,no asics.The big rigs limitation is a joke.If people use it,they have invested,and the will support the coin.With my 7950 it has no sence to even try mining,for the crumbs i would earn,i better go to some other coin,to know,what i can get.I would give it a chance,if i could try luck by solo,but this is solo unfriendly coin.
|
|
|
|
barryzand
|
|
August 06, 2014, 08:29:37 AM |
|
Fuck Give it some time... it will go down... i saw that yesterday too a few times...
|
|
|
|
ASICrefugee
|
|
August 06, 2014, 08:44:41 AM |
|
Fuck Give it some time... it will go down... i saw that yesterday too a few times... Never mind the single guy with the, for a VERY short while, hashrate, you should be more concerned with multiple rigs from the same user cheating the system. Lets look at block 1098 on MaxMiners Sort by username and go to page 6 and we have 85 HarryPc21 8 0 0.00 111 HarryPc22 8 0 0.00 124 HarryPc25 4 0 0.00 103 HarryPc26 8 0 0.00 If there is a limit of 1 worker per 1 user per pool, how are the pool admins missing these multiple miners? ?? I haven't checked the other pool but I guess the story will be the same
|
|
|
|
johnnyrocket
|
|
August 06, 2014, 09:02:32 AM |
|
Anyway,this is X15,no asics.The big rigs limitation is a joke.If people use it,they have invested,and the will support the coin.With my 7950 it has no sence to even try mining,for the crumbs i would earn,i better go to some other coin,to know,what i can get.I would give it a chance,if i could try luck by solo,but this is solo unfriendly coin.
Limiting workers or hashrates will inevitably fail because people will just create multiple users. Especially with the coin already being X15, what's the purpose in that anyway?
|
|
|
|
orgi666
|
|
August 06, 2014, 09:04:07 AM |
|
Fuck Give it some time... it will go down... i saw that yesterday too a few times... Never mind the single guy with the, for a VERY short while, hashrate, you should be more concerned with multiple rigs from the same user cheating the system. Lets look at block 1098 on MaxMiners Sort by username and go to page 6 and we have 85 HarryPc21 8 0 0.00 111 HarryPc22 8 0 0.00 124 HarryPc25 4 0 0.00 103 HarryPc26 8 0 0.00 If there is a limit of 1 worker per 1 user per pool, how are the pool admins missing these multiple miners? ?? I haven't checked the other pool but I guess the story will be the same I have access to several networks in the neighborhood,if i had the money to rent rigs,i could use all 7 comps at home to have several wallets with unique IP,and there is no problem to do the same with pools,that is why i say,this is bullshit.
|
|
|
|
ASICrefugee
|
|
August 06, 2014, 09:17:55 AM |
|
Fuck Give it some time... it will go down... i saw that yesterday too a few times... Never mind the single guy with the, for a VERY short while, hashrate, you should be more concerned with multiple rigs from the same user cheating the system. Lets look at block 1098 on MaxMiners Sort by username and go to page 6 and we have 85 HarryPc21 8 0 0.00 111 HarryPc22 8 0 0.00 124 HarryPc25 4 0 0.00 103 HarryPc26 8 0 0.00 If there is a limit of 1 worker per 1 user per pool, how are the pool admins missing these multiple miners? ?? I haven't checked the other pool but I guess the story will be the same I have access to several networks in the neighborhood,if i had the money to rent rigs,i could use all 7 comps at home to have several wallets with unique IP,and there is no problem to do the same with pools,that is why i say,this is bullshit. I agree - it is technically possible to game the system with multiple IPs and VPN. What I am trying to convey is that it is EASY to spot the STUPID ones, - go anon and we can't see - but if you are thick enough to use a variation of the same username then you should be treated as the scum that floats to the top of the pond and be skimmed off (banned, all accounts) Pool operators want to get onto the problem - IF they are calling it a fair system
|
|
|
|
orgi666
|
|
August 06, 2014, 09:25:17 AM |
|
Fuck Give it some time... it will go down... i saw that yesterday too a few times... Never mind the single guy with the, for a VERY short while, hashrate, you should be more concerned with multiple rigs from the same user cheating the system. Lets look at block 1098 on MaxMiners Sort by username and go to page 6 and we have 85 HarryPc21 8 0 0.00 111 HarryPc22 8 0 0.00 124 HarryPc25 4 0 0.00 103 HarryPc26 8 0 0.00 If there is a limit of 1 worker per 1 user per pool, how are the pool admins missing these multiple miners? ?? I haven't checked the other pool but I guess the story will be the same I have access to several networks in the neighborhood,if i had the money to rent rigs,i could use all 7 comps at home to have several wallets with unique IP,and there is no problem to do the same with pools,that is why i say,this is bullshit. I agree - it is technically possible to game the system with multiple IPs and VPN. What I am trying to convey is that it is EASY to spot the STUPID ones, - go anon and we can't see - but if you are thick enough to use a variation of the same username then you should be treated as the scum that floats to the top of the pond and be skimmed off (banned, all accounts) Pool operators want to get onto the problem - IF they are calling it a fair system Fair system? Fair is only solo,without any pools.Any regulation is a step into dark. Generally,there is nothing inovative about this coin,not even the naivity.
|
|
|
|
ff00jek
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 1
Merit: 0
|
|
August 06, 2014, 09:29:49 AM |
|
I have only 18,5 MH/S
5x7870 -> 1,750 and 4x 7970 -> 2,440
|
|
|
|
barryzand
|
|
August 06, 2014, 09:45:40 AM |
|
SPEED LIMIT: 20 MH/s per User ! One Worker per User and one User per Pool ! (suprnova pool) If Im reading this correctly... you are allowed too create a account at both pools... limited too 1 per pool... I have accounts on both pools as well... simply because I like too switch pools every now and then... btw.... I cant find anything about these rules in the OP... except that were limited too 20mhs...
|
|
|
|
Amph
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3248
Merit: 1070
|
|
August 06, 2014, 09:45:43 AM Last edit: August 06, 2014, 11:28:04 AM by Amph |
|
Fuck Give it some time... it will go down... i saw that yesterday too a few times... Never mind the single guy with the, for a VERY short while, hashrate, you should be more concerned with multiple rigs from the same user cheating the system. Lets look at block 1098 on MaxMiners Sort by username and go to page 6 and we have 85 HarryPc21 8 0 0.00 111 HarryPc22 8 0 0.00 124 HarryPc25 4 0 0.00 103 HarryPc26 8 0 0.00 If there is a limit of 1 worker per 1 user per pool, how are the pool admins missing these multiple miners? ?? I haven't checked the other pool but I guess the story will be the same I have access to several networks in the neighborhood,if i had the money to rent rigs,i could use all 7 comps at home to have several wallets with unique IP,and there is no problem to do the same with pools,that is why i say,this is bullshit. I agree - it is technically possible to game the system with multiple IPs and VPN. What I am trying to convey is that it is EASY to spot the STUPID ones, - go anon and we can't see - but if you are thick enough to use a variation of the same username then you should be treated as the scum that floats to the top of the pond and be skimmed off (banned, all accounts) Pool operators want to get onto the problem - IF they are calling it a fair system that's why you should limit the NET HASH also, problem solved no more ip cheating, no more bullshit who come late is just fucked, should've come early, first come first serve
|
|
|
|
uray
|
|
August 06, 2014, 10:29:01 AM |
|
It was dead before launch,this was meant as BIG PROFIT FOR POOLS.Fuck this coin and anything similiar.
Lol, what? Don't try to FUD this. I think this is a great initiative. No instamine with huge rigs = no big dumps after launch on exchange. Bullshit,cryptocurrency has to be controlled by the comunity,pools are like banks.... Solo miners are the only way to keep coins free,without control of a small group of people.If the trend of early sources and no wallets goes on,people will stop mining.There are several coins every day,most of them are dead before launch.Because of stupidity of the devs.This one will be dead right after the end of POW.Everyone will dump..... Hands away. try look at Minerals they did like this first time, and the result is: better distribution, great community, coins still alive, no huge dump, everyone happy, except people like you, who just love pump & dump coins. if coins should be free, then there should be a freedom to make controlled or private coins, let peoples and market decide
|
|
|
|
shanecoins
|
|
August 06, 2014, 10:31:32 AM |
|
It was dead before launch,this was meant as BIG PROFIT FOR POOLS.Fuck this coin and anything similiar.
Lol, what? Don't try to FUD this. I think this is a great initiative. No instamine with huge rigs = no big dumps after launch on exchange. Bullshit,cryptocurrency has to be controlled by the comunity,pools are like banks.... Solo miners are the only way to keep coins free,without control of a small group of people.If the trend of early sources and no wallets goes on,people will stop mining.There are several coins every day,most of them are dead before launch.Because of stupidity of the devs.This one will be dead right after the end of POW.Everyone will dump..... Hands away. try look at Minerals they did like this first time, and the result is: better distribution, great community, coins still alive, no huge dump, everyone happy, except people like you, who just love pump & dump coins. if coins should be free, then there should be a freedom to make controlled or private coins, let peoples and market decide +1
|
|
|
|
uray
|
|
August 06, 2014, 10:32:22 AM |
|
Fuck Give it some time... it will go down... i saw that yesterday too a few times... Never mind the single guy with the, for a VERY short while, hashrate, you should be more concerned with multiple rigs from the same user cheating the system. Lets look at block 1098 on MaxMiners Sort by username and go to page 6 and we have 85 HarryPc21 8 0 0.00 111 HarryPc22 8 0 0.00 124 HarryPc25 4 0 0.00 103 HarryPc26 8 0 0.00 If there is a limit of 1 worker per 1 user per pool, how are the pool admins missing these multiple miners? ?? I haven't checked the other pool but I guess the story will be the same I have access to several networks in the neighborhood,if i had the money to rent rigs,i could use all 7 comps at home to have several wallets with unique IP,and there is no problem to do the same with pools,that is why i say,this is bullshit. I agree - it is technically possible to game the system with multiple IPs and VPN. What I am trying to convey is that it is EASY to spot the STUPID ones, - go anon and we can't see - but if you are thick enough to use a variation of the same username then you should be treated as the scum that floats to the top of the pond and be skimmed off (banned, all accounts) Pool operators want to get onto the problem - IF they are calling it a fair system Fair system? Fair is only solo,without any pools.Any regulation is a step into dark. Generally,there is nothing inovative about this coin,not even the naivity. if you dont like it, just simply don't use it, don't mine it and don't buy it. simple... noobs...
|
|
|
|
yellowduck2
|
|
August 06, 2014, 10:36:52 AM |
|
Fuck Give it some time... it will go down... i saw that yesterday too a few times... Never mind the single guy with the, for a VERY short while, hashrate, you should be more concerned with multiple rigs from the same user cheating the system. Lets look at block 1098 on MaxMiners Sort by username and go to page 6 and we have 85 HarryPc21 8 0 0.00 111 HarryPc22 8 0 0.00 124 HarryPc25 4 0 0.00 103 HarryPc26 8 0 0.00 If there is a limit of 1 worker per 1 user per pool, how are the pool admins missing these multiple miners? ?? I haven't checked the other pool but I guess the story will be the same I have access to several networks in the neighborhood,if i had the money to rent rigs,i could use all 7 comps at home to have several wallets with unique IP,and there is no problem to do the same with pools,that is why i say,this is bullshit. I agree - it is technically possible to game the system with multiple IPs and VPN. What I am trying to convey is that it is EASY to spot the STUPID ones, - go anon and we can't see - but if you are thick enough to use a variation of the same username then you should be treated as the scum that floats to the top of the pond and be skimmed off (banned, all accounts) Pool operators want to get onto the problem - IF they are calling it a fair system that why you should limit the NET HASH also, problem solved no more ip cheating, no more bullshit who come late is just fucked, should've come early, first come first serve actually this is a good idea. It prevent people like me from timing to mine this coin I will mine this coin @ block 4320
|
|
|
|
uray
|
|
August 06, 2014, 10:38:32 AM |
|
Anyway,this is X15,no asics.The big rigs limitation is a joke.If people use it,they have invested,and the will support the coin.With my 7950 it has no sence to even try mining,for the crumbs i would earn,i better go to some other coin,to know,what i can get.I would give it a chance,if i could try luck by solo,but this is solo unfriendly coin.
Limiting workers or hashrates will inevitably fail because people will just create multiple users. Especially with the coin already being X15, what's the purpose in that anyway? the purpose is for better distribution, better is not an absolute uniformly distributed, its just better.., this scheme make harder for people with huge hashrate to monopolize hashrate, sure you still can fool the system, but if you are willing to fool the system, then you put more effort in mining this coins, if you put a lot of effort then you will get more feeling of "owning" the coins, this will reduce owner incentive to dumps...
|
|
|
|
|