Bitcoin Forum
November 11, 2024, 10:24:50 AM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 28.0 [Torrent]
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  
Pages: [1]
  Print  
Author Topic: Article names bitcoin as "standard unit of tracking computational work" - LOL  (Read 1126 times)
AmpEater (OP)
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 232
Merit: 250



View Profile
May 04, 2011, 07:20:47 PM
 #1

http://www.searchenginejournal.com/new-google-grant-awards-researchers-with-cpu-power/29122/

"This program, dubbed the “Exacycle for Visiting Faculty Grant Program,” will distribute a billion core-hours to researchers around the globe. Exactly what “core-hours” mean in technical specifications is actually difficult to pinpoint, as core-hours isn’t one of the standard tracking units for CPU work (“bitcoins” being the more commonly used computation tracking unit). However, Google assures applicants that the amount granted represents a “magnitude larger than the computational resources most scientists normally have access to.”

I thought it was funny that some reporter did a quick google and decided that a "bitcoin" was a unit of measure of computational work.

....Not exactly wrong, but far from right Smiley
tomcollins
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 182
Merit: 101


View Profile
May 04, 2011, 07:22:17 PM
 #2

http://www.searchenginejournal.com/new-google-grant-awards-researchers-with-cpu-power/29122/

"This program, dubbed the “Exacycle for Visiting Faculty Grant Program,” will distribute a billion core-hours to researchers around the globe. Exactly what “core-hours” mean in technical specifications is actually difficult to pinpoint, as core-hours isn’t one of the standard tracking units for CPU work (“bitcoins” being the more commonly used computation tracking unit). However, Google assures applicants that the amount granted represents a “magnitude larger than the computational resources most scientists normally have access to.”

I thought it was funny that some reporter did a quick google and decided that a "bitcoin" was a unit of measure of computational work.

....Not exactly wrong, but far from right Smiley


LOL reporters.  Good God they are dumb.  I remember how terrible they were for the high school newspapers, but it turns out they never get better.
eMansipater
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 294
Merit: 273



View Profile WWW
May 04, 2011, 07:29:39 PM
 #3

In ten years Best Buy salespeople everywhere will be telling customers "this baby will do 25 bitcoins no problem!"

If you found my post helpful, feel free to send a small tip to 1QGukeKbBQbXHtV6LgkQa977LJ3YHXXW8B
Visit the BitCoin Q&A Site to ask questions or share knowledge.
0.009 BTC too confusing?  Use mBTC instead!  Details at www.em-bit.org or visit the project thread to help make Bitcoin prices more human-friendly.
gigabytecoin
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 280
Merit: 252


View Profile
May 04, 2011, 08:21:33 PM
 #4

I'm not sure they they're actually making reference to bitcoins as we know them.

I think they might actually be referring to a colloquial reference which is used inside the Google community?

Instead of getting paid in cash, they are getting paid in bits in a sense... or bit-cash/bit-coins...

Perhaps our heads have grown too large?
Pages: [1]
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!