Hamas and The Tea Party

[Rigon]

Obama has cut spending, had to deal with Bush’s mess, does not have the SS surplus that Reagan, Bush and Bush used to hide much of their record deficits and much of Obama’s deficit is the caused by the shortage in the SS fund.   Then Obama has had to deal with Republicans’ promise to screw up everything until we get rid of the Black President.

 

So get this through your heads.  The Republicans are the one who waste money, they increase welfare (much of it is for the rich) and even with their record tax increases they set record deficits.

Good lord, why would you vote for a Republican?

They voted republican because Bush started two wars AND cut taxes at the same time, and they thought this was a grand idea.  That is the conservative's idea of sound fiscal policy. 

When asked specifically what items he disagreed with on the Tea Party platform and why he feared them the above is his response. Totally incapable of any intelligent debate or to even stand up and defend his claims.  But no one expected you to actually debate your claims or defend your stance because we all know that would take a few more brain cells that you posses.

[noviapriani]

Obama has cut spending, had to deal with Bush’s mess, does not have the SS surplus that Reagan, Bush and Bush used to hide much of their record deficits and much of Obama’s deficit is the caused by the shortage in the SS fund.   Then Obama has had to deal with Republicans’ promise to screw up everything until we get rid of the Black President.

 

So get this through your heads.  The Republicans are the one who waste money, they increase welfare (much of it is for the rich) and even with their record tax increases they set record deficits.

Good lord, why would you vote for a Republican?

They voted republican because Bush started two wars AND cut taxes at the same time, and they thought this was a grand idea.  That is the conservative's idea of sound fiscal policy. 

When asked specifically what items he disagreed with on the Tea Party platform and why he feared them the above is his response. Totally incapable of any intelligent debate or to even stand up and defend his claims.  But no one expected you to actually debate your claims or defend your stance because we all know that would take a few more brain cells that you posses.

We agree with much of what the Tea Party says.  We also agreed with the promises Reagan, Bush and Bush made.  It just that they all turned out to be lies.  We are still waiting for the Republicans’ no nation building, cuts in government spending, cuts in taxes and paying off the national debt.  You know the things that happen under the Democrats.

[umair127]

Obama has cut spending, had to deal with Bush’s mess, does not have the SS surplus that Reagan, Bush and Bush used to hide much of their record deficits and much of Obama’s deficit is the caused by the shortage in the SS fund.   Then Obama has had to deal with Republicans’ promise to screw up everything until we get rid of the Black President.

 

So get this through your heads.  The Republicans are the one who waste money, they increase welfare (much of it is for the rich) and even with their record tax increases they set record deficits.

Good lord, why would you vote for a Republican?

They voted republican because Bush started two wars AND cut taxes at the same time, and they thought this was a grand idea.  That is the conservative's idea of sound fiscal policy. 

Then Bush’s wars, waste and tax cuts lead to inflation, the tax for mismanaging everything. It was this tax increase on the working class that triggered Bush’s Great Recession.  The Republicans mantra is “spend, tax and borrow”.

[Rigon]

Debit has grown, you might ask the SENATE.  Four annual Budgets were not passed, do remember the law that was also changed.  You might take the time to ask what the motive is  or was about the budget.  Do remember that the budgit was stopped in the Senate, Democrate.

[GamersBitcoin]

Obama has cut spending, had to deal with Bush’s mess, does not have the SS surplus that Reagan, Bush and Bush used to hide much of their record deficits and much of Obama’s deficit is the caused by the shortage in the SS fund.   Then Obama has had to deal with Republicans’ promise to screw up everything until we get rid of the Black President.

 

So get this through your heads.  The Republicans are the one who waste money, they increase welfare (much of it is for the rich) and even with their record tax increases they set record deficits.

Good lord, why would you vote for a Republican?

They voted republican because Bush started two wars AND cut taxes at the same time, and they thought this was a grand idea.  That is the conservative's idea of sound fiscal policy. 

When asked specifically what items he disagreed with on the Tea Party platform and why he feared them the above is his response. Totally incapable of any intelligent debate or to even stand up and defend his claims.  But no one expected you to actually debate your claims or defend your stance because we all know that would take a few more brain cells that you posses.

agree no one will debate for nothing to claim somthing .
btw as you know this story of men seems like old school story.

[herzmeister]

TERRORIST

The War On Terra http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zNRIv82Jvfo 

[Chef Ramsay]

Obama has cut spending, had to deal with Bush’s mess, does not have the SS surplus that Reagan, Bush and Bush used to hide much of their record deficits and much of Obama’s deficit is the caused by the shortage in the SS fund.   Then Obama has had to deal with Republicans’ promise to screw up everything until we get rid of the Black President.

 

So get this through your heads.  The Republicans are the one who waste money, they increase welfare (much of it is for the rich) and even with their record tax increases they set record deficits.

Good lord, why would you vote for a Republican?

They voted republican because Bush started two wars AND cut taxes at the same time, and they thought this was a grand idea.  That is the conservative's idea of sound fiscal policy. 

When asked specifically what items he disagreed with on the Tea Party platform and why he feared them the above is his response. Totally incapable of any intelligent debate or to even stand up and defend his claims.  But no one expected you to actually debate your claims or defend your stance because we all know that would take a few more brain cells that you posses.

We agree with much of what the Tea Party says.  We also agreed with the promises Reagan, Bush and Bush made.  It just that they all turned out to be lies.  We are still waiting for the Republicans’ no nation building, cuts in government spending, cuts in taxes and paying off the national debt.  You know the things that happen under the Democrats.

For one, it's the TP folks that are trying to hold the republican establishment's line on caving on debt hikes over and above the true fiscal hawks in the liberty republican movement. Both of the parties have a political class and ruling elite and they both compromise our rights away. But to sit here and act like democrats are somehow different and that they are this savior of a party that cuts spending, doesn't nation build or pays off any portion of the national debt is beyond laughable. Currently, there isn't any identifiable element in the democratic party that stands for any of those things like there is and growing w/i the republican party. Why left leaning people don't admit that on one hand or give credit where credit is due on the other just flat out baffles me. The GOP establishment uses people of this mindset because they whip you all up about the non-establishment's supposed social views and then gets you all riled up to the point of meddling in GOP primaries to vote for the corporate bankster/special interest MIC establishment republicans that you supposedly hate. It's maddening. At least there's a growing anti-establishment status in the GOP that is looking to clean house, not so much on the left side is all they do is circle the wagons w/ drone talking points and fairy tales instead of lambasting the frauds on their side.

[Mike Christ]

Still nothing but baseless accusations from zolace. No credible sources cited. I'm beginning to think he is nothing more than a troll.

He's not a troll; AFAIK he's a progressive or something similar, which means he has to call out his party's boogieman from time to time to reaffirm his beliefs.  It's nothing to deliberately incite a reaction, people genuinely take this stuff seriously.  Divide and conquer tactics people mistake as ideology; in reality, they all support forced adherence to an authority (thus making it all the same fundamental ideology), the argument is just over how they'll adhere.

[Wilikon]

Captured Hamas Combat Manual Explains Benefits of Human Shields



A Hamas manual on "Urban Warfare" found by the Israeli Defense Forces makes it unmistakably clear that Hamas desires civilian casualties amongst its own people and encourages its fighters to engage in battles in civilian populated areas in order to draw an Israeli response.

"Where is the U.N. Human Rights Council? Where is Amnesty International? Where is Human Rights Watch? Where is the international media and Middle East pundits. Where are all the lawfare experts? Here is 'Exhibit A' to indict Hamas for war crimes and crimes against humanity by placing the people of Gaza as human shields," said Rabbis Marvin Hier and Abraham Cooper, dean and founder and associate dean of the Simon Wiesenthal Center.

IDF forces in the Gaza Strip found a Hamas manual on “Urban Warfare,” which belonged to the Shuja’iya Brigade of Hamas’ military wing, the Al-Qassam Brigades. The manual explains how the civilian population can be used against IDF forces and reveals that Hamas knows the IDF is committed to minimizing harm to civilians.

Throughout Operation Protective Edge, Hamas has continuously used the civilian population of Gaza as human shields. The discovery of a Hamas “urban warfare” manual by IDF forces reveals that Hamas’ callous use of the Gazan population was intentional and preplanned.

This Hamas urban warfare manual exposes two truths: (1) The terror group knows full well that the IDF will do what it can to limit civilian casualties. (2) The terror group exploits these efforts by using civilians as human shields against advancing IDF forces.

In a portion entitled “Limiting the Use of Weapons,” the manual explains that:

The soldiers and commanders (of the IDF) must limit their use of weapons and tactics that lead to the harm and unnecessary loss of people and [destruction of] civilian facilities. It is difficult for them to get the most use out of their firearms, especially of supporting fire [e.g. artillery].

Clearly Hamas knows the IDF will limit its use of weapons in order to avoid harming civilians, including refraining from using larger firepower to support for infantry.

The manual goes on to explain that the “presence of civilians are pockets of resistance” that cause three major problems for advancing troops:

(1) Problems with opening fire
(2) Problems in controlling the civilian population during operations and afterward
(3) Assurance of supplying medical care to civilians who need it

Lastly, the manual discusses the benefits for Hamas when civilian homes are destroyed:

The destruction of civilian homes: This increases the hatred of the citizens towards the attackers [the IDF] and increases their gathering [support] around the city defenders (resistance forces[i.e. Hamas]).

It is clear that Hamas actually desires the destruction of homes and civilian infrastructure, knowing it will increase hatred for the IDF and support their fighters.

http://www.idfblog.com/blog/2014/08/04/captured-hamas-combat-manual-explains-benefits-human-shields/

------------------------------------------------
Need to be compared with the Tea Party manual...

 

[Ron~Popeil]

Obama has cut spending, had to deal with Bush’s mess, does not have the SS surplus that Reagan, Bush and Bush used to hide much of their record deficits and much of Obama’s deficit is the caused by the shortage in the SS fund.   Then Obama has had to deal with Republicans’ promise to screw up everything until we get rid of the Black President.

 

So get this through your heads.  The Republicans are the one who waste money, they increase welfare (much of it is for the rich) and even with their record tax increases they set record deficits.

Good lord, why would you vote for a Republican?

They voted republican because Bush started two wars AND cut taxes at the same time, and they thought this was a grand idea.  That is the conservative's idea of sound fiscal policy. 

When asked specifically what items he disagreed with on the Tea Party platform and why he feared them the above is his response. Totally incapable of any intelligent debate or to even stand up and defend his claims.  But no one expected you to actually debate your claims or defend your stance because we all know that would take a few more brain cells that you posses.

We agree with much of what the Tea Party says.  We also agreed with the promises Reagan, Bush and Bush made.  It just that they all turned out to be lies.  We are still waiting for the Republicans’ no nation building, cuts in government spending, cuts in taxes and paying off the national debt.  You know the things that happen under the Democrats.

So 7 Trillion dollars in new debt is cutting spending and paying down the debt?