Maged
Legendary
 Offline
Activity: 1204
Merit: 1015
|
 |
May 27, 2011, 02:22:21 AM |
|
A guy once lost 9.000 BTC by restoring a backup produced before a send transaction which had these 9.000 as input. That motivated Satoshi to implement the pool of addresses feature. EDIT: Here's the topic: http://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=782.0Looking back at that, he still had 1 btc. So... 9300.22 - 1.00 ---------- 9299.22 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Bitcoin network protocol was designed to be extremely flexible. It can be used to create timed transactions, escrow transactions, multi-signature transactions, etc. The current features of the client only hint at what will be possible in the future.
|
|
|
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction.
|
|
|
kjj
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1302
Merit: 1024
|
|
May 27, 2011, 02:57:36 AM |
|
How about the 50 from the duplicate generation in blocks 91812 and 91842? |
17Np17BSrpnHCZ2pgtiMNnhjnsWJ2TMqq8
I routinely ignore posters with paid advertising in their sigs. You should too.
|
|
|
|
Anonymous
Guest
|
|
May 27, 2011, 03:42:22 AM |
|
1007-1009 Somewhere around there.
Don't ask. Too painful of a story.
|
|
|
|
|
SgtSpike (OP)
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1400
Merit: 1005
|
|
May 27, 2011, 03:44:35 AM |
|
9299.22
+ 50.00
+ 1007.00
----------
10,356.22
|
|
|
|
|
theymos
Administrator
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 5180
Merit: 12865
|
|
May 27, 2011, 04:09:16 AM |
|
How about the 50 from the duplicate generation in blocks 91812 and 91842? There's another duplicate in 91880. |
1NXYoJ5xU91Jp83XfVMHwwTUyZFK64BoAD
|
|
|
SgtSpike (OP)
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1400
Merit: 1005
|
|
May 27, 2011, 05:18:09 AM |
|
10,356.22
+ 50.00
----------
10,406.22
|
|
|
|
|
Sean
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 13
Merit: 0
|
|
May 27, 2011, 06:32:14 AM |
|
God, a banking system would really have come in handy here...
|
|
|
|
|
cypherdoc
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1764
Merit: 1002
|
|
May 27, 2011, 04:07:05 PM |
|
A guy once lost 9.000 BTC by restoring a backup produced before a send transaction which had these 9.000 as input. That motivated Satoshi to implement the pool of addresses feature. EDIT: Here's the topic: http://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=782.0as i recall it was 9000 btc! |
|
|
|
|
Batouzo
Member
Offline
Activity: 70
Merit: 10
|
|
May 27, 2011, 04:20:25 PM |
|
10,356.22
+ 50.00
----------
10,406.22
10,406.22 + 50.00 ---------- 10,456.22 Not 100% sure, but looked like we lost a block probably due to default jgarzik's pool not retrying re-submiting work when bitcoind was unreachable... Oh well. Fortunately no one else was mining at that moment. It was a very short round too with just like 500 shares...  |
|
|
|
|
cypherdoc
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1764
Merit: 1002
|
|
May 27, 2011, 04:25:24 PM |
|
A guy once lost 9.000 BTC by restoring a backup produced before a send transaction which had these 9.000 as input. That motivated Satoshi to implement the pool of addresses feature. EDIT: Here's the topic: http://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=782.0as i recall it was 9000 btc! actually 8999 |
|
|
|
|
cypherdoc
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1764
Merit: 1002
|
|
May 27, 2011, 04:29:42 PM |
|
A guy once lost 9.000 BTC by restoring a backup produced before a send transaction which had these 9.000 as input. That motivated Satoshi to implement the pool of addresses feature. EDIT: Here's the topic: http://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=782.0as i recall it was 9000 btc! actually 8999 8999X$8.70= $78291  |
|
|
|
|
dwdollar
Full Member
Offline
Activity: 202
Merit: 109
GCC - Global cryptocurrency
|
|
May 27, 2011, 04:32:17 PM |
|
Back in late 2009, I bought 1000 from NewLibertyStandard for about $1.
Not long after I formatted my hard drive and didn't bother with them saving them...
Yeah I know. What an idiot.
+1000
|
|
|
|
|
|
SgtSpike (OP)
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1400
Merit: 1005
|
|
May 27, 2011, 04:46:05 PM |
|
Back in late 2009, I bought 1000 from NewLibertyStandard for about $1.
Not long after I formatted my hard drive and didn't bother with them saving them...
Yeah I know. What an idiot.
+1000
10,456.22 +1,000.00 ----------- 11,456.22 |
|
|
|
|
cypherdoc
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1764
Merit: 1002
|
|
May 27, 2011, 04:46:30 PM |
|
kjj, how'd u find the block? |
|
|
|
|
cypherdoc
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1764
Merit: 1002
|
|
May 27, 2011, 04:47:23 PM |
|
this is a great thread! learning alot!
|
|
|
|
|
kjj
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1302
Merit: 1024
|
|
May 27, 2011, 04:49:02 PM |
|
kjj, how'd u find the block?
I just clicked back through the chain until I saw a 9000 -> 8999 + 1 transaction around the right date. |
17Np17BSrpnHCZ2pgtiMNnhjnsWJ2TMqq8
I routinely ignore posters with paid advertising in their sigs. You should too.
|
|
|
cypherdoc
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1764
Merit: 1002
|
|
May 27, 2011, 04:54:00 PM |
|
kjj, how'd u find the block?
I just clicked back through the chain until I saw a 9000 -> 8999 + 1 transaction around the right date. i assume u did this in Block Explorer. just went there and they only have the last 20 or so blocks listed? how'd u search further back? also how did u know what date the block got solved? |
|
|
|
|
kjj
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1302
Merit: 1024
|
|
May 27, 2011, 05:00:05 PM |
|
kjj, how'd u find the block?
I just clicked back through the chain until I saw a 9000 -> 8999 + 1 transaction around the right date. i assume u did this in Block Explorer. just went there and they only have the last 20 or so blocks listed? how'd u search further back? also how did u know what date the block got solved? You can click all the way back to the genesis block by using the Previous Block links. Stone Man posted about the loss here on the forums the next day. |
17Np17BSrpnHCZ2pgtiMNnhjnsWJ2TMqq8
I routinely ignore posters with paid advertising in their sigs. You should too.
|
|
|
caveden
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1106
Merit: 1004
|
|
May 27, 2011, 05:07:33 PM |
|
A guy once lost 9.000 BTC by restoring a backup produced before a send transaction which had these 9.000 as input. That motivated Satoshi to implement the pool of addresses feature. EDIT: Here's the topic: http://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=782.0as i recall it was 9000 btc! That's what I said above... (maybe I should have dropped the dot or write 9.000,00 to make it clearer) |
|
|
|
|
|
