Bitcoin Forum
November 12, 2024, 06:11:03 PM *
News: Check out the artwork 1Dq created to commemorate this forum's 15th anniversary
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  
Warning: One or more bitcointalk.org users have reported that they strongly believe that the creator of this topic is a scammer. (Login to see the detailed trust ratings.) While the bitcointalk.org administration does not verify such claims, you should proceed with extreme caution.
Pages: [1]
  Print  
Author Topic: Every Miner Should be Running Child Pays for Parent  (Read 1442 times)
Razick (OP)
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1330
Merit: 1003


View Profile
August 06, 2014, 12:28:25 AM
 #1

Why isn't child-pays-for-parent the default behavior for miners and pools? Sending low fee transactions is an easy mistake to make, and can be a huge disaster. New users are especially vulnerable since many may have heard that transactions will confirm without fees.

I am currently trying to pay a seller for a purchase that he was nice enough to send before payment. Now though, he can't receive a confirmed payment because I forgot my rarely-used Blockchain.info wallet was set to "frugal" fee mode. This would be so easy to fix if miners would implement child-pays-for-parent, but as it is, it looks like the seller will have to wait 9.4 days (according to an estimate on another thread) to receive payment, which isn't fair to him.

There really isn't any reason not to implement CPP. It not only benefits consumers, but also miners since they get fees for otherwise free transactions.

ACCOUNT RECOVERED 4/27/2020. Account was previously hacked sometime in 2017. Posts between 12/31/2016 and 4/27/2020 are NOT LEGITIMATE.
cloverme
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1512
Merit: 1057


SpacePirate.io


View Profile WWW
August 08, 2014, 11:16:22 PM
 #2

I don't understand what you're getting at here... are you talking about passing the fee somehow? Can you give a better example of how this would work in mining?
eleuthria
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1750
Merit: 1007



View Profile
August 08, 2014, 11:30:44 PM
 #3

I don't understand what you're getting at here... are you talking about passing the fee somehow? Can you give a better example of how this would work in mining?

I believe he's referring to a making a second transaction using the inputs of the inadequate fee one (no confirmations), and attaching a large(r) fee to this second transaction in order to get the first one confirmed faster.  Which I could have sworn was part of bitcoind's default behavior...

RIP BTC Guild, April 2011 - June 2015
cloverme
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1512
Merit: 1057


SpacePirate.io


View Profile WWW
August 08, 2014, 11:45:16 PM
 #4

I believe he's referring to a making a second transaction using the inputs of the inadequate fee one (no confirmations), and attaching a large(r) fee to this second transaction in order to get the first one confirmed faster.  Which I could have sworn was part of bitcoind's default behavior...

I think you're right, I thought there was some allowance for that in there as well, but it might not be supported by the particular wallet. I don't fuss with it, I pay the fee and hope that some of it comes back my way in the mining process later Wink Kick the leprechaun today and hope for gold tomorrow

 
Pages: [1]
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!