[ANN] [PLEB] Plebeian | *Mandatory Wallet Update* | X13 PoW + PoS | Mine Now!|

[karimdr2]

Mac Wallet

http://www.mediafire.com/download/xp82o3jnxvfx7pb/Plebeian-Qt.zip

PLEB: AyvTN2EF8dMvLa44JeeR8ezyggX4PUsg5z
BTC: 1Gu3KYr3HV1TGJmqgSXXQbGxxdLzTEAN6o

[shimlbit]

wts 2600coins pm me

[ocminer]

There is currently still the issue with the Coin Reward issue at 0 coins since Block 476.


i've changed my daemon's main.cpp file from this:

Code:

    int64_t nSubsidy = 100 * COIN;
	if(pindexBest->nHeight < 1)
    {
        nSubsidy = 462586 * COIN;
    }
		else if(pindexBest->nHeight < 420)
    {
		nSubsidy = 4200 * COIN;
    }
		else if(pindexBest->nHeight < 476)
    {
		nSubsidy = 4200 * COIN;
    }
		else if(pindexBest->nHeight < 5400)
	{
		nSubsidy = 0 * COIN;
	}

to this:

Code:

            int64_t nSubsidy = 100 * COIN;
        if(pindexBest->nHeight == 1)
    {
        nSubsidy = 462586 * COIN;
    }
                else if(pindexBest->nHeight > 1 && pindexBest->nHeight <= 5400)
    {
                nSubsidy = 4200 * COIN;
    }

Which should fix the issue.


Hopefully the devs fix the problem soon, your wallets at home (and the mac version) wont accept the blocks with higher values above 476 until the Devs fix their code, don't panic, it will as soon as the Dev's fix it.



EDIT: Works as expected

https://i.imgur.com/GPV0T29.png

[najzenmajsen]

There is currently still the issue with the Coin Reward issue at 0 coins since Block 476.


i've changed my daemon's main.cpp file from this:

Code:

    int64_t nSubsidy = 100 * COIN;
	if(pindexBest->nHeight < 1)
    {
        nSubsidy = 462586 * COIN;
    }
		else if(pindexBest->nHeight < 420)
    {
		nSubsidy = 4200 * COIN;
    }
		else if(pindexBest->nHeight < 476)
    {
		nSubsidy = 4200 * COIN;
    }
		else if(pindexBest->nHeight < 5400)
	{
		nSubsidy = 0 * COIN;
	}

to this:

Code:

        if(pindexBest->nHeight < 1)
    {
        nSubsidy = 462586 * COIN;
    }
                else if(pindexBest->nHeight >= 2 && pindexBest->nHeight <= 5400)
    {
                nSubsidy = 4200 * COIN;
    }

Which should fix the issue.


Hopefully the devs fix the problem soon, your wallets at home (and the mac version) wont accept the blocks with higher values above 476 until the Devs fix their code, don't panic, it will as soon as the Dev's fix it.



EDIT: Works as expected

https://i.imgur.com/GPV0T29.png

so , is it safe to mine now ?

[ocminer]

There is currently still the issue with the Coin Reward issue at 0 coins since Block 476.


i've changed my daemon's main.cpp file from this:

Code:

    int64_t nSubsidy = 100 * COIN;
	if(pindexBest->nHeight < 1)
    {
        nSubsidy = 462586 * COIN;
    }
		else if(pindexBest->nHeight < 420)
    {
		nSubsidy = 4200 * COIN;
    }
		else if(pindexBest->nHeight < 476)
    {
		nSubsidy = 4200 * COIN;
    }
		else if(pindexBest->nHeight < 5400)
	{
		nSubsidy = 0 * COIN;
	}

to this:

Code:

        if(pindexBest->nHeight < 1)
    {
        nSubsidy = 462586 * COIN;
    }
                else if(pindexBest->nHeight >= 2 && pindexBest->nHeight <= 5400)
    {
                nSubsidy = 4200 * COIN;
    }

Which should fix the issue.


Hopefully the devs fix the problem soon, your wallets at home (and the mac version) wont accept the blocks with higher values above 476 until the Devs fix their code, don't panic, it will as soon as the Dev's fix it.



EDIT: Works as expected

https://i.imgur.com/GPV0T29.png

so , is it safe to mine now ?

The issue is fixed, but the dev's have not commited the fix to their source now..

If you look at the Specs for the coin, it SHOULD be safe now, as I've simply corrected their error in the code but maybe they have something different on their mind..

I cannot say for 100% as I'm not the dev :-(

[cryptoangel]

Looking at the code you would think the 0 reward was normal.

I am questioning the developer skills now.

[najzenmajsen]

Looking at the code you would think the 0 reward was normal.

I am questioning the developer skills now.

this dev , seems strange
the wallet seems very awesome , i like the integrated block explorer , statstics , but
1. the 0 reward as you mentioned
2. they didnt even register the IRC
*-*

[cryptoangel]

Looking at the code you would think the 0 reward was normal.

I am questioning the developer skills now.

this dev , seems strange
the wallet seems very awesome , i like the integrated block explorer , statstics , but
1. the 0 reward as you mentioned
2. they didnt even register the IRC
*-*

Nice hashrate on Novapool

[najzenmajsen]

Looking at the code you would think the 0 reward was normal.

I am questioning the developer skills now.

this dev , seems strange
the wallet seems very awesome , i like the integrated block explorer , statstics , but
1. the 0 reward as you mentioned
2. they didnt even register the IRC
*-*

Nice hashrate on Novapool

Thanks , im doing a gamble i guess ^^

[martibg]

HOW DO I SOLO MINE THIS 

[cryptoangel]

Looking at the code you would think the 0 reward was normal.

I am questioning the developer skills now.

this dev , seems strange
the wallet seems very awesome , i like the integrated block explorer , statstics , but
1. the 0 reward as you mentioned
2. they didnt even register the IRC
*-*

Nice hashrate on Novapool

Thanks , im doing a gamble i guess ^^

Yeah 50/50 on this one, They can accept the changes + the mistake or change it completely.

This is the best time to be in it with all the other pools mining 0 block rewards.

[najzenmajsen]

dev should be online in 2-5 hours

[najzenmajsen]

There is currently still the issue with the Coin Reward issue at 0 coins since Block 476.


i've changed my daemon's main.cpp file from this:

Code:

    int64_t nSubsidy = 100 * COIN;
	if(pindexBest->nHeight < 1)
    {
        nSubsidy = 462586 * COIN;
    }
		else if(pindexBest->nHeight < 420)
    {
		nSubsidy = 4200 * COIN;
    }
		else if(pindexBest->nHeight < 476)
    {
		nSubsidy = 4200 * COIN;
    }
		else if(pindexBest->nHeight < 5400)
	{
		nSubsidy = 0 * COIN;
	}

to this:

Code:

        if(pindexBest->nHeight < 1)
    {
        nSubsidy = 462586 * COIN;
    }
                else if(pindexBest->nHeight >= 2 && pindexBest->nHeight <= 5400)
    {
                nSubsidy = 4200 * COIN;
    }

Which should fix the issue.


Hopefully the devs fix the problem soon, your wallets at home (and the mac version) wont accept the blocks with higher values above 476 until the Devs fix their code, don't panic, it will as soon as the Dev's fix it.



EDIT: Works as expected

https://i.imgur.com/GPV0T29.png

so , is it safe to mine now ?

The issue is fixed, but the dev's have not commited the fix to their source now..

If you look at the Specs for the coin, it SHOULD be safe now, as I've simply corrected their error in the code but maybe they have something different on their mind..

I cannot say for 100% as I'm not the dev :-(

When it says FINDER : unknown what does it mean ? and why does it do that ?

[ocminer]

There is currently still the issue with the Coin Reward issue at 0 coins since Block 476.


i've changed my daemon's main.cpp file from this:

Code:

    int64_t nSubsidy = 100 * COIN;
	if(pindexBest->nHeight < 1)
    {
        nSubsidy = 462586 * COIN;
    }
		else if(pindexBest->nHeight < 420)
    {
		nSubsidy = 4200 * COIN;
    }
		else if(pindexBest->nHeight < 476)
    {
		nSubsidy = 4200 * COIN;
    }
		else if(pindexBest->nHeight < 5400)
	{
		nSubsidy = 0 * COIN;
	}

to this:

Code:

        if(pindexBest->nHeight < 1)
    {
        nSubsidy = 462586 * COIN;
    }
                else if(pindexBest->nHeight >= 2 && pindexBest->nHeight <= 5400)
    {
                nSubsidy = 4200 * COIN;
    }

Which should fix the issue.


Hopefully the devs fix the problem soon, your wallets at home (and the mac version) wont accept the blocks with higher values above 476 until the Devs fix their code, don't panic, it will as soon as the Dev's fix it.



EDIT: Works as expected

https://i.imgur.com/GPV0T29.png

so , is it safe to mine now ?

The issue is fixed, but the dev's have not commited the fix to their source now..

If you look at the Specs for the coin, it SHOULD be safe now, as I've simply corrected their error in the code but maybe they have something different on their mind..

I cannot say for 100% as I'm not the dev :-(

When it says FINDER : unknown what does it mean ? and why does it do that ?

Database has to catch up.. Give it a few mins

[najzenmajsen]

Where is the other 4g's comming from , i thought supernova was on own fork ^_^

[uray]

Mac Wallet

http://www.mediafire.com/download/xp82o3jnxvfx7pb/Plebeian-Qt.zip

PLEB: AyvTN2EF8dMvLa44JeeR8ezyggX4PUsg5z
BTC: 1Gu3KYr3HV1TGJmqgSXXQbGxxdLzTEAN6o

confirmed working and synced on osx 10.9.4

[uray]

guys why suprnova is 20 blocks longer than current block on wallet ?

[cryptoangel]

guys why suprnova is 20 blocks longer than current block on wallet ?

The source code has block rewards set at 0, OCminer (Suprnova) noticed this and changed it to the correct block reward.

Look at the pools, only suprnova is mining correct block sizes but the other are mining blocks at zero 0 reward.

I am not sure on the end outcome, just need to wait for the plebs.

[uray]

guys why suprnova is 20 blocks longer than current block on wallet ?

The source code has block rewards set at 0, OCminer (Suprnova) noticed this and changed it to the correct block reward.

Look at the pools, only suprnova is mining correct block sizes but the other are mining blocks at zero 0 reward.

I am not sure on the end outcome, just need to wait for the plebs.

so the other pools are stupid? and we are on the wrong chain ?

[ocminer]

I made a small mistake with the code, the correct new code is:

Code:

     if(pindexBest->nHeight == 1)
    {
        nSubsidy = 462586 * COIN;
    }
                else if(pindexBest->nHeight > 1 && pindexBest->nHeight <= 5400)
    {
                nSubsidy = 4200 * COIN;
    }

(Notice the == instead of <)