[ANN] Miley Cyrus Coin [MCC] 0% Pre-mine No IPO Only 1.2 Million Coins [TRADING]

[spacelab]

MCC should be on popular exchanges like bittrex, mintpal and cryptsy. Miners would be happy to trade this coin for some BTC. Unless those exchanges are not afraid of being sued.

Bittrex adds coins that are tweeted out using their hash tag so to support Miley use hashtag #Bittrex when talking about Miley Cyrus Coins on Twitter 

erryone get to twittin

[sixteendigits]

Wow, it really hit me just how shitty of an investment these scrypt ASICs were when this is literally the most promising coin I could find to mine.

[H0USE]

Wow, it really hit me just how shitty of an investment these scrypt ASICs were when this is literally the most promising coin I could find to mine.

What ASIC are you running?

[NikolaD]

A lot of hash power on this Miley coin anyone really seeing this going further than a 10 page thread 

[cryptzo]

A lot of hash power on this Miley coin anyone really seeing this going further than a 10 page thread 

lol, why not. It's come this far. And yeah, this is the most interesting scrypt coin to mine atm. How do you like them apples.

[sixteendigits]

Wow, it really hit me just how shitty of an investment these scrypt ASICs were when this is literally the most promising coin I could find to mine.

What ASIC are you running?

GAW miners black widow, around 13.5 MHs.  Have a second one I got on oneminer.com for the low low price of 350$.  Havent even bothered to power it up yet because there is nothing worth mining.  There is a gridseed blade somewhere around here too.

[Lizard_Destroyer]

MCC should be on popular exchanges like bittrex, mintpal and cryptsy. Miners would be happy to trade this coin for some BTC. Unless those exchanges are not afraid of being sued.

Bittrex adds coins that are tweeted out using their hash tag so to support Miley use hashtag #Bittrex when talking about Miley Cyrus Coins on Twitter 

erryone get to twittin

Okay... I hate Twitter, but I'll set up an account.

[93under93]

Why is the http://gc-pool.ddns.net/miley/public/ pool have more Pool Hash than the Network Hash? Is this an error? If it's not an error, is MCC going to have a 51% attack? Or in this case, a 100% attack? Not sure on the finer points of the attacks, but yeah... I know it's good to separate hashing power, at least.

[cryptzo]

Why is the http://gc-pool.ddns.net/miley/public/ pool have more Pool Hash than the Network Hash? Is this an error? If it's not an error, is MCC going to have a 51% attack? Or in this case, a 100% attack? Not sure on the finer points of the attacks, but yeah... I know it's good to separate hashing power, at least.

the fact that it's on a pool makes it safer than if it's a single individual. The pool itself would have to attack the coin, and if that's the case it'll show up in the block explorer.

This early in the game, with no block explorer, and no exchanges, it isn't that big of a problem, but once it does hit exchanges you're absolutely right we need to spread that hash out, because then there'll actually be some value to the coin and an incentive to actually attempt something like that.

[Lucky Cris]

Why is the http://gc-pool.ddns.net/miley/public/ pool have more Pool Hash than the Network Hash? Is this an error? If it's not an error, is MCC going to have a 51% attack? Or in this case, a 100% attack? Not sure on the finer points of the attacks, but yeah... I know it's good to separate hashing power, at least.

the fact that it's on a pool makes it safer than if it's a single individual. The pool itself would have to attack the coin, and if that's the case it'll show up in the block explorer.

This early in the game, with no block explorer, and no exchanges, it isn't that big of a problem, but once it does hit exchanges you're absolutely right we need to spread that hash out, because then there'll actually be some value to the coin and an incentive to actually attempt something like that.

Evidently you don't know what the hell you're talking about.

Fork!!!! LOL

[ronoa]

Miley is gonna endorse this one day soon 

That's why I'm continuously mining this coin since launch, I have a feeling that this is going to be huge if Miley surprisingly endorses MCC. 

[cryptzo]

Why is the http://gc-pool.ddns.net/miley/public/ pool have more Pool Hash than the Network Hash? Is this an error? If it's not an error, is MCC going to have a 51% attack? Or in this case, a 100% attack? Not sure on the finer points of the attacks, but yeah... I know it's good to separate hashing power, at least.

the fact that it's on a pool makes it safer than if it's a single individual. The pool itself would have to attack the coin, and if that's the case it'll show up in the block explorer.

This early in the game, with no block explorer, and no exchanges, it isn't that big of a problem, but once it does hit exchanges you're absolutely right we need to spread that hash out, because then there'll actually be some value to the coin and an incentive to actually attempt something like that.

Evidently you don't know what the hell you're talking about.

Fork!!!! LOL

If everyone's running on the same pool, then basically you don't have to worry about a fork. The fork issue happens when you get two competing pools that aren't confirming each other's transactions. A big deal for sure, but there's only two dang pools right now. It's impossible for one of them to not have more than 50% of the hashrate, so until someone gets off their lazy butts and gets pools added so that there's 3+ pools to spread hashrates around on to prevent forking, or someone sets up a p2pool, then everyone's just better off mining at the same pool. Yes, that means mining at the other pool can create a fork, but you can't really prevent that issue when there's only two damn pools.

It's the same concept as voting. Vote on anything with two people voting and any disagreement ends in a stalemate. Add a third person voting, and suddenly that's not an issue, because at least two people have to agree. Same in crypto, if you've got at least 3 mining pools, and no pool has more than 50% of the hashrate, then forking is far less of a problem. But with only two pools, trying to balance the hashrate would actually cause a fork, not prevent one, because there's no authority to sort out the differences and say which chain is the authoritative one.

[Black Mamba]

 https://twitter.com/I_Want_MCC
 

[RouletteRun]

Hmmm! I wish you guys luck and success. I hope Miley endorses the coin, because I believe it could bring a lot of fresh young blood into cryptos for the future, but if you have hope of all this happening, you need to self police this thread in the hopes her lawyers don't take you down. That being said, at 4 coins per block, each coin better have a very high value to make mining profitable.

[crocko]

yet another scam & worthless coin

[cryptzo]

yet another scam & worthless coin

That word... scam... i'm not sure it means what you think it means. Coin was created for the fun of it. Nobody has invested a penny into it beyond the cost of mining it, and those of us mining it are mining it because, frankly, there isn't anything better to mine.

That's not a scam. But I can't argue with your second point. It is presently worthless.

[Black Mamba]

retweet please 

https://twitter.com/I_Want_MCC/status/501057551812030464

[sdmathis]

yet another scam & worthless coin

One would think that a Sr Member would be smart enough to know what the word "scam" means. I guess not.

[F1k]

What port does this wallet connect on? Bitcoin takes up too many resources but I wouldn't mind running a public node for this alongside my KOIN node.

[Febo]

Where can mileys get bought?