Bitcoin Forum
December 17, 2017, 08:42:40 PM *
News: Latest stable version of Bitcoin Core: 0.15.1  [Torrent].
 
   Home   Help Search Donate Login Register  
Pages: « 1 2 [3] 4 »  All
  Print  
Author Topic: [ANN][MULTIPOOL SERVICE] thepool.pw multipool  (Read 9635 times)
This is a self-moderated topic. If you do not want to be moderated by the person who started this topic, create a new topic.
sakr
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 366



View Profile
December 07, 2014, 08:45:30 PM
 #41

New Scrypt-N asic friendly port added!

Tested with the new KNC titan firmware.
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction. Advertise here.
1513543360
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1513543360

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1513543360
Reply with quote  #2

1513543360
Report to moderator
1513543360
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1513543360

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1513543360
Reply with quote  #2

1513543360
Report to moderator
loszhor
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 356


View Profile
December 13, 2014, 11:27:39 AM
 #42

Thank you for the service but I have two questions:

1. What is the criteria for a coin pool being removed due to lack of profitability? Ex. "A pool must mine x amount of btc per week to stay open." or "A pool must maintain x amount of hashrate per week to stay open."

2. What ways can we set our own difficulty with the stratum? Doing so will allow miners to work more efficiently. 

Also, I would like to request a status page be added for troubleshooting and efficiency purposes.

16wQCVFXYuSp4AYsBqV9Uqa2dd1V4YXvJ5
sakr
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 366



View Profile
December 13, 2014, 04:36:19 PM
 #43

Thank you for the service but I have two questions:

1. What is the criteria for a coin pool being removed due to lack of profitability? Ex. "A pool must mine x amount of btc per week to stay open." or "A pool must maintain x amount of hashrate per week to stay open."

2. What ways can we set our own difficulty with the stratum? Doing so will allow miners to work more efficiently. 

Also, I would like to request a status page be added for troubleshooting and efficiency purposes.

Thanks for your interest in our service, to answer your questions, first there is no criteria for pool removal unless it's technically impossible to keep it open like in cases where the blockchian for a coin is not moving or the coin has been removed from all exchanges.

Regarding manually setting workers diff, it's currently unsupported as we use NOMP stratums, however, the vardiff is set to quickly adapt, and has been tested with the highest hash asics.

As for monitoring/troubleshooting, it's a good idea, we will look into adding some more advanced features for that.

loszhor
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 356


View Profile
December 14, 2014, 08:01:54 AM
 #44

Thank you for the service but I have two questions:

1. What is the criteria for a coin pool being removed due to lack of profitability? Ex. "A pool must mine x amount of btc per week to stay open." or "A pool must maintain x amount of hashrate per week to stay open."

2. What ways can we set our own difficulty with the stratum? Doing so will allow miners to work more efficiently. 

Also, I would like to request a status page be added for troubleshooting and efficiency purposes.

Thanks for your interest in our service, to answer your questions, first there is no criteria for pool removal unless it's technically impossible to keep it open like in cases where the blockchian for a coin is not moving or the coin has been removed from all exchanges.

Regarding manually setting workers diff, it's currently unsupported as we use NOMP stratums, however, the vardiff is set to quickly adapt, and has been tested with the highest hash asics.

As for monitoring/troubleshooting, it's a good idea, we will look into adding some more advanced features for that.



OK, thank you and I look forward to a stats page.

16wQCVFXYuSp4AYsBqV9Uqa2dd1V4YXvJ5
jeroentie
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 79


View Profile
December 14, 2014, 01:03:04 PM
 #45

New Scrypt-N asic friendly port added!

Tested with the new KNC titan firmware.

i have tried to run the scrypt-n(VEX wallet address) with the titan from kcnminer, but i only runs for 1 minute and then stops mining.

What is the problem?


M.Jcoin [Giveaway] M8RwbjenuDFAh6RJDisTcuTu2gUJ9dkops
sakr
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 366



View Profile
December 14, 2014, 06:03:21 PM
 #46

New Scrypt-N asic friendly port added!

Tested with the new KNC titan firmware.

i have tried to run the scrypt-n(VEX wallet address) with the titan from kcnminer, but i only runs for 1 minute and then stops mining.

What is the problem?



Please make sure you use the new KNCminer titan scrypt-n firmware and also the right port, the pool has been tested with a couple of titans and all is working fine.

KNC retweeted about it here: https://twitter.com/kncminer

Please provide logs for further assistance.

Also VEX coin is not on c-cex anymore, not sure where to buy it.
sakr
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 366



View Profile
December 15, 2014, 02:58:46 AM
 #47

TEK multipool is up at: http://thepool.pw/TEK/
thundertoe
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 938



View Profile
December 17, 2014, 05:05:15 PM
 #48

TEK multipool is up at: http://thepool.pw/TEK/

Thank you,

Pool was up fast and is working great!
sakr
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 366



View Profile
December 18, 2014, 06:12:23 PM
 #49

Scrypt-N port now closed due to the low profitability/volume of the scrypt-n coins after vertcoin switched to new algo!
loszhor
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 356


View Profile
January 01, 2015, 05:57:17 AM
 #50

Is it possible to request payment in a different coin if the FOOD blockchain does not get fixed? I have been staking it for the networks health but hopefully it is only a temporary issue.

16wQCVFXYuSp4AYsBqV9Uqa2dd1V4YXvJ5
Rekx
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 18

Swing, Pendulum.


View Profile
January 01, 2015, 02:10:41 PM
 #51

Im having a problem.  Sad Ive been mining for a few days on http://thepool.pw/TEK. Says that im recieving payment on the website but in my wallet nothing has ever came in. Nothing received... What is the problem? http://s7.postimg.org/v0g0ewxwr/tekpic.jpg

The more you push, the more it comes back.. Swing.
sakr
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 366



View Profile
January 01, 2015, 03:51:38 PM
 #52

Is it possible to request payment in a different coin if the FOOD blockchain does not get fixed? I have been staking it for the networks health but hopefully it is only a temporary issue.

FOOD blockchain is moving again, payouts sent!
sakr
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 366



View Profile
January 01, 2015, 03:52:14 PM
 #53

Im having a problem.  Sad Ive been mining for a few days on http://thepool.pw/TEK. Says that im recieving payment on the website but in my wallet nothing has ever came in. Nothing received... What is the problem?

Please make sure you are on the right TEK fork and using the latest version!
Rekx
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 18

Swing, Pendulum.


View Profile
January 01, 2015, 05:40:27 PM
 #54

Im having a problem.  Sad Ive been mining for a few days on http://thepool.pw/TEK. Says that im recieving payment on the website but in my wallet nothing has ever came in. Nothing received... What is the problem? http://s7.postimg.org/v0g0ewxwr/tekpic.jpg

Please make sure you are on the right TEK fork and using the latest version!

Ok i think i found the problem. Trying to fix. Ty.

The more you push, the more it comes back.. Swing.
sakr
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 366



View Profile
January 01, 2015, 07:59:51 PM
 #55

Ok i think i found the problem. Trying to fix. Ty.

The transactions show on the block explorer: http://tek.blockchain.lt/tx/faac5eab49e46c0149c24038b26a9c28f1646e5d5ab1ba9cf065061cdea1c228

Please try redownloading the blockchain.
loszhor
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 356


View Profile
January 03, 2015, 08:06:14 AM
 #56

I am planning on acquiring some more mining equipment within the next few weeks. Are there any pitfalls to watch out for when pointing more than one miner to a single payout address on the same algorithm? At the moment I have found no issues but I just want to be sure.

16wQCVFXYuSp4AYsBqV9Uqa2dd1V4YXvJ5
sakr
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 366



View Profile
January 03, 2015, 09:35:28 AM
 #57

I am planning on acquiring some more mining equipment within the next few weeks. Are there any pitfalls to watch out for when pointing more than one miner to a single payout address on the same algorithm? At the moment I have found no issues but I just want to be sure.

Using a single address with multiple miners is totally fine.
loszhor
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 356


View Profile
January 03, 2015, 10:39:19 AM
 #58

I am planning on acquiring some more mining equipment within the next few weeks. Are there any pitfalls to watch out for when pointing more than one miner to a single payout address on the same algorithm? At the moment I have found no issues but I just want to be sure.

Using a single address with multiple miners is totally fine.

OK, thank you.

16wQCVFXYuSp4AYsBqV9Uqa2dd1V4YXvJ5
sakr
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 366



View Profile
January 25, 2015, 10:46:20 AM
 #59



Important announcement: Due to the very low hash on the pools lately,
the payouts will be processed every 2 or 3 days to lower the exchange fees.

Also, we are considering shutting down the pools completely due to the very low hash/profitability,
we have been running at loss for weeks now Sad

loszhor
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 356


View Profile
January 25, 2015, 11:36:04 AM
 #60



Important announcement: Due to the very low hash on the pools lately,
the payouts will be processed every 2 or 3 days to lower the exchange fees.

Also, we are considering shutting down the pools completely due to the very low hash/profitability,
we have been running at loss for weeks now Sad


    Lowering the payout rate would be one way to reduce costs but you should consider auditing the pools with the least profitability/activity as well as which coins you are mining. One of this pool's drawbacks is the lack of information that is available and little communication. Your last post here was January 3rd and the last twitter announcement was on December 14th and that was to announcement a new pool. This sudden announcement that the pool has been in trouble for weeks is something that should have been brought up sooner. I don't mean to insinuate but the suddenness makes it sound like a scare tactic. I will indeed give you the benefit of the doubt that it is not though.

    What kind of costs are you running and what is the ideal hash rate that you think you need?

   

16wQCVFXYuSp4AYsBqV9Uqa2dd1V4YXvJ5
Pages: « 1 2 [3] 4 »  All
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Sponsored by , a Bitcoin-accepting VPN.
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!