Bitcoin Forum
May 11, 2024, 02:49:29 PM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 27.0 [Torrent]
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  
Pages: [1]
  Print  
Author Topic: Mining costs are still low in some places methinks  (Read 1196 times)
windjc (OP)
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2156
Merit: 1070


View Profile
August 11, 2014, 09:37:45 PM
 #1

After seeing this article on Reddit today:

http://www.thecoinsman.com/2014/08/bitcoin/inside-chinese-bitcoin-mine/

This mining company is making roughly $170000 a month while paying out $60000 a month for electricity + 3 employees + hardware costs.

3 Chinese employees probably cost less than $3k a month total.

And while everyone assumes that hardware is expensive, I'm willing to bet that the owner probably has a chip making factory somewhere or is getting them from a fellow chinese man for dirt cheap.

I would be surprised if this facility was clearing more than $80k month in profit after total costs.

There's a reason other than insanity that the hashrate still climbs exponentially.
1715438969
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1715438969

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1715438969
Reply with quote  #2

1715438969
Report to moderator
1715438969
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1715438969

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1715438969
Reply with quote  #2

1715438969
Report to moderator
1715438969
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1715438969

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1715438969
Reply with quote  #2

1715438969
Report to moderator
There are several different types of Bitcoin clients. The most secure are full nodes like Bitcoin Core, but full nodes are more resource-heavy, and they must do a lengthy initial syncing process. As a result, lightweight clients with somewhat less security are commonly used.
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction.
1715438969
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1715438969

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1715438969
Reply with quote  #2

1715438969
Report to moderator
1715438969
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1715438969

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1715438969
Reply with quote  #2

1715438969
Report to moderator
1715438969
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1715438969

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1715438969
Reply with quote  #2

1715438969
Report to moderator
dropt
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1512
Merit: 1000



View Profile
August 11, 2014, 10:07:00 PM
 #2

Put it this way: if you assume my HW is paid for and I'm operating in the black. My cost per BTC is ~$90.

This is fact.
SMB-2525
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 195
Merit: 100


View Profile
August 11, 2014, 11:03:58 PM
 #3

At 575 tera-hash, $2,000/day power, 16% difficulty increases every 12 days - this operation goes negative on power cost in 132 days. That will be in winter so maybe they will save on cooling and go a little longer. I show it making $353K in $600 BTC: almost 600 BTC.

I cannot determine the allocation of the exiting power cost between Watts/GHS and $/KWH, so the following is a guestimate:
This hardware is 2W/GHS and power is 0.072/KWH.

What happens then.

Using .8W/GHS and starting with the estimated difficulty on 12/6/14 when this operation is down to $30K/month gross revenue): 87036052189.
Toss all the old hardware and bring in 1.5 peta-hash of new hardware at .8W/GHS - roughly same power consumption.

This setup will cashflow for 84 days and generate maybe $113K in revenue.  They need the hardware to cost $0.075/GHS or $75/THS to break even.

Something is going to change in the next few months.

Please check my math.
Pages: [1]
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!