Bitcoin Forum
November 14, 2024, 05:41:55 AM *
News: Check out the artwork 1Dq created to commemorate this forum's 15th anniversary
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  
Pages: [1]
  Print  
Author Topic: I'm a tad bit confused...  (Read 1329 times)
bmoscato (OP)
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 361
Merit: 267


View Profile
August 13, 2014, 02:49:37 PM
 #1

I’m new to the crypto-currency world but I have a background in the foreign exchange trade market and I have a few questions because I’m confused to the long term possibilities of this type of currency since it’s not backed by a government like the Euro, Dollar, Yen…  I fully understand that most world currencies are floating due to not being backed by silver or gold and that their intrinsic value can vary from day to day.  But each country uses a unified currency locally (fiat currencies) that is manufactured, destroyed, monitored and accounted for by their governments.

Right now there are approximately 275 different crypto-currencies that you can mine and trade online.  What makes any one currency a better choice than another?  Currently, it seems that Bitcoin is the standard, followed by Litecoin.  Most other currencies seem like they are mined or traded on speculation that they will take off or to acquire fractions of Bitcoin.  Here’s my big issue; if no one is using a currency for commerce, then, how are blocks being generated?  Are they just generating blocks to verify the trade, movement or dispersion of a block?  It’s like they are creating busy work to generate more blocks to create more busy work for something that has absolutely no value and has not been accepted by the masses.  People would probably take a currency more seriously if there was some kind of structure to it.  Right now the market on Bitcoin is volatile and I would never use it as a means of commerce for my company… It’s also expensive as you have the trade fees that go along with changing a crypto back into your local fiat currency.  Most local companies will only trade in their local currency, they will not accept foreign currency due to the volatility in the exchange rates and the cost of the exchange.

What’s going to happen when the cost of mining exceeds the profit for the miners?  How are trades going to be verified?

I’m not opposed to the thought of crypto currency that is widely accepted, but none are.  I say this just based on all the hoops you have to jump through to just change the USD into Bitcoins.  You have to use a third party clearing house to move your fiat currency to a point that it can be sent to an exchange to purchase bitcoins.  You are literally paying multiple agencies for the privilege of buying something with bitcoins.  So, you literally diluted your fiat dollar to buy something with a crypto that you could’ve just purchased with a fiat…
LiteCoinGuy
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1148
Merit: 1014


In Satoshi I Trust


View Profile WWW
August 13, 2014, 03:40:22 PM
 #2

What makes any one currency a better choice than another?  


bitcoin has a first mover advantage. it has everything it needs to be used as money and no other crypto can bring something truly new to the table. bitcoin is gold, litecoin is silver. maybe namecoin has a nice concept but stay away from all other stuff (probably maleware).

bitcoin opens a whole new world for alot of reasons.

for your other questions:

http://www.youtube.com/channel/UCgo7FCCPuylVk4luP3JAgVw


 Smiley

franky1
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 4410
Merit: 4763



View Profile
August 13, 2014, 05:31:03 PM
Last edit: August 13, 2014, 05:46:45 PM by franky1
 #3

I’m new to the crypto-currency world but I have a background in the foreign exchange trade market and I have a few questions because I’m confused to the long term possibilities of this type of currency since it’s not backed by a government like the Euro, Dollar, Yen…  I fully understand that most world currencies are floating due to not being backed by silver or gold and that their intrinsic value can vary from day to day.  But each country uses a unified currency locally (fiat currencies) that is manufactured, destroyed, monitored and accounted for by their governments.
FIAT AND BITCOIN has intrinsic value purely because its useful as a means of trade between people. neither are backed by anything tangeable.
FIAT is backed by the beleif that X amount of labour = X amount of fiat (minimum wage laws help with this resistance point)
BITCOIN is backed by the belief that miners wont sell at a loss = resistance point (miners costs and traders buys help with this)
(yes bitcoin just like the forex/stock market has resistance points, so this should not be new to you to understand)

but in both cases of bitcoin and fiat this is fluid and not solid rule.

Right now there are approximately 275 different crypto-currencies that you can mine and trade online.  What makes any one currency a better choice than another?  

in short if the altcoin is only used as speculation on exchanges and has no real world use, it wont survive. so far bitcoin has over 100k merchant USES and thousands of other infrastructure elements. which no other altcoin can even come close to

initially on launch day an altcoin has a nice story, a plan and a concept of how it can change the world. so at launch it may have the belief of value. but as the intrinsic (usefulness) does not become a reality (no merchant acceptance/ no infrastructure) then this causes a price dip, then miners move away and the resistance point weakens causing the price to drop.

Currently, it seems that Bitcoin is the standard, followed by Litecoin.  Most other currencies seem like they are mined or traded on speculation that they will take off or to acquire fractions of Bitcoin.  Here’s my big issue; if no one is using a currency for commerce, then, how are blocks being generated?  

it only takes 1 person with a USB stick to 'mine blocks'(more than 1 is better but it can survive on just 1 miner) so the altcoin inventor would be mining, even if no one is moving coins between blocks (no  transactions) blocks are still made and the miner still gets the block reward. if later all the exchanges dropped the coin off its listing as no one was playing the penny markets. then the last miner(using the coin created) just stops mining, and he moves on with his life and the coin is pretty much dead

Are they just generating blocks to verify the trade, movement or dispersion of a block?  It’s like they are creating busy work to generate more blocks to create more busy work for something that has absolutely no value and has not been accepted by the masses.  
although blocks are suppose to be made to verify transactions, there can be blocks with no transactions in them. and if no transactions are happening this usually means it has no purpose in real life. and as such there would b low-no resistance point, meaning the price would drop, this would make miners not profit from mining it. and give up.

the flip side if a coin has a proper purpose and usefulness there would be a value and those buying the coin would set a resistance point (lowest price they would sell at) and if this price was above mining costs, miners would mine it for profit. and then those mined coins sells would reset the resistance price higher as the buyers wont sell theirs at a loss. if the price keeps rising more miners will mine it for profit. and then increase how many mining rigs they have to try grabbing more of the reward compared to other miners. which is where the cost of mining increases.

now if the coin has usefulness and purpose the increase of mining costs, which helps to raise the resistance to sell at a loss, will cause a price rise, which as i said if the coin is useful and purposeful, there will always be a demand for the coin. and so the price would naturally rise.

its like gold. if gold had no purpose, no one would mine it and no one would buy it. so as long as people have a use for bitcoin it will be mined and will be bought. and as i said above bitcoin not only has well over 100k merchants that people find useful, but bitcoin also has the benefits which paypal and credit cards cant offer. (pseudonymity, no chargeback, small transaction value, large transaction value, micro fee's)

People would probably take a currency more seriously if there was some kind of structure to it.  Right now the market on Bitcoin is volatile and I would never use it as a means of commerce for my company…
It’s also expensive as you have the trade fees that go along with changing a crypto back into your local fiat currency.  Most local companies will only trade in their local currency, they will not accept foreign currency due to the volatility in the exchange rates and the cost of the exchange.

there is a structure. not only are there merchants, but there is the network security of its non-central nature, the security of the mining, and the other things like bitpay which if you ask for $10 of bitcoin from a customer, you will get $10 in your bank account (bitpay freeplan: https://bitpay.com/pricing)

What’s going to happen when the cost of mining exceeds the profit for the miners?  How are trades going to be verified?
this happens often. when the cost of mining rises or due to dumb traders dumping the price below the resistance price, making mining non-profitable. smart miners continue to mine as they know its only a blip. whilst dumb miners give up and switch of their units for a small period. but as i say all though there are thousands of miners today it only really needs 1 to make blocks and maybe 3 people to make it decentralised and less prown to manipulation.

but as those dumb miners that turn off their units for a small while are no longer getting their 'cut' of the block reward, those who continue mining get a bigger slice of the reward and as such this should compensate them when they sell their coin at the low price because they have more coin to sell.


I’m not opposed to the thought of crypto currency that is widely accepted, but none are.  I say this just based on all the hoops you have to jump through to just change the USD into Bitcoins.  You have to use a third party clearing house to move your fiat currency to a point that it can be sent to an exchange to purchase bitcoins.  You are literally paying multiple agencies for the privilege of buying something with bitcoins.  

when you work. your business pays you a wage, in alot of countries it takes 3-5 days to move the funds. then lets say you wanted to buy something off ebay. your funds have to move into paypal and then into the ebay auction ,then to the seller and then the seller has to move it into his own bank account. so thinking about the funds movement. thre is alot of work hppening that you dont realise, even in the FIAT market.

take buying stocks and shares. you had to sign up for a trade account, put your life story into the registration page. then move funds in and buy the stock/share. you may have noticed the commission/spot/capital gains causes the funds that you had in the bank being of different value to the stock/share you finally get. again its not a 1 step process without fee's is it?

lastly services such as bitpay, localbitcoins, ATM's are making the swapping part easier. but i have to agree with you in part, that it is still not quite there in being 100% consumer/layman friendly. but that is where bitcoin is still growing and developing. bitcoin is not their yet for the mass adoption stage, its still early, we are still at the innovator stage. so dont worry, the best is yet to come.

So, you literally diluted your fiat dollar to buy something with a crypto that you could’ve just purchased with a fiat…

at the moment its not 100% for people to use as a direct paypal replacement (although people do, do it) bitcoin is still early innovator investment area, so people buying it are those looking to turn it into profit to later spend. not to just buy bitcoin to spend withing the same hour, though that time is coming. and people are noticing that the loaf of bread that cost $2 last year is now $2.50 and that U.S dollar, argentinian peso and many other currencies are going the same way as the Zimbabwe dollar, due to inflation (bitcoin is deflationary) thus more people are seeing this benefit to hold bitcoin as well as the other benefits that credit cards, paypal and paper cash don't offer people.

I DO NOT TRADE OR ACT AS ESCROW ON THIS FORUM EVER.
Please do your own research & respect what is written here as both opinion & information gleaned from experience. many people replying with insults but no on-topic content substance, automatically are 'facepalmed' and yawned at
Coinport Exchange Support
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 7
Merit: 0


View Profile WWW
August 13, 2014, 06:29:40 PM
 #4

If the profit of miners is not as high as the price of electricity. Miners will leave, then it will become more profitable for the miners that do mine, balancing it out. Simple economics. But if electricity costs so much that noone will want to mine, then, we are in quite a bit of trouble.
franky1
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 4410
Merit: 4763



View Profile
August 13, 2014, 06:46:43 PM
 #5

If the profit of miners is not as high as the price of electricity. Miners will leave, then it will become more profitable for the miners that do mine, balancing it out. Simple economics. But if electricity costs so much that noone will want to mine, then, we are in quite a bit of trouble.

thats the weak thought plan of emotional miners.
so far in the last 4-5 years the price of bitcoin has NEVER dropped below average miner costs for more than a day at a time, because the price normally corrects itself back to the resistance point after a flash crash. (hence why bitcoin didnt go below $450 in spring this year or below $100 in october last year)

a small amount of miners will give up if they see it at -1% to -5% profit. as thy are very emotional. but smart miners will continue because a minus 1-5 percent is meaningless as just spending fiat to buy bitcoin for holding would also cost them that in fee's trying to 'get in'  to bitcoin.

any crash greater then 5% loss would soon correct itself, which so far has proven correct. and thus the majority of miners just push on through it and hoard coins for the day its profitable.

the small amount of dumb/emotional miners that do give up simply help give the smart miners a larger slice of bitcoin.

EG
if a smart miner usually got 1btc a day, and if 10% of miners emotionally chose to stop mining. the smart miner would now get 1.1btc without needed to do anything.
so if the price went from $550 to $500 the smart miner is still making $550 reward per day.

and as you can see todays $523 low due to the etherium dump is no correcting itself. (lets hope they dont dump again today though). and the average cost of mining is around the $500-$550 price. so still profitable for miners.

so those hoping for a $100-$400 bitcoin price will only happen if a flash crash due to a mega dump occured. which will correct itself. so dont hope for a long term $100-$500 price, thats a thing of the past


I DO NOT TRADE OR ACT AS ESCROW ON THIS FORUM EVER.
Please do your own research & respect what is written here as both opinion & information gleaned from experience. many people replying with insults but no on-topic content substance, automatically are 'facepalmed' and yawned at
Cryddit
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 924
Merit: 1132


View Profile
August 13, 2014, 07:05:12 PM
 #6


Most currencies have value by government fiat.  Bitcoin has value by USER fiat, which has historical precedent, but  it's something that has been the exception rather than the rule for the last eight thousand years or so.

Mining is, well, it's mining.  Conversion of electricity into Bitcoin.  How much Bitcoin is produced per unit time is constant in the long run due to the diff adjustment; a declining bitcoin price would just mean converting a correspondingly smaller amount of electricity into bitcoin.  So if for example the price were to decline from $580 to $290 over the next month, you'd see about half of existing mining hardware taken offline, and newly-minted bitcoins would continue to appear on the market at approximately the same rate.  And when the price came back up, you'd see as much of that mining equipment as were still efficient enough to be profitable coming out of storage and going back online. 

The only thing the price really affects about mining is how much electricity the miners are willing to convert in order to get one bitcoin.



BPMich
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 11
Merit: 0


View Profile WWW
August 13, 2014, 08:02:18 PM
 #7

Excellent post franky, bookmarking this so I can better explain this to some of my friends...
Satan666
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 123
Merit: 100

The love of fiat is the root of all good


View Profile
August 13, 2014, 08:18:51 PM
 #8

What’s going to happen when the cost of mining exceeds the profit for the miners?  How are trades going to be verified?

As with any business, miners that are unable to operate profitably will eventually go out of business and those that are able to operate profitably will stay in business.  Those miners that are most efficient and able to control costs will continue to operate.
Pages: [1]
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!