Bitcoin Forum
December 09, 2016, 12:04:38 AM *
News: Latest stable version of Bitcoin Core: 0.13.1  [Torrent].
 
   Home   Help Search Donate Login Register  
Pages: [1]
  Print  
Author Topic: legal schmegal (just one layman's opinion)  (Read 984 times)
cbeast
Donator
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1722

Let's talk governance, lipstick, and pigs.


View Profile
March 26, 2012, 05:09:26 PM
 #1

Trying to pigeonhole Bitcoin into defined parameters in a financial world of cronyism for Wall Street and junk bonds for Main Street profferred by financial thaumaturgists is nothing short of ridiculous. Most of what is done is done behind closed doors, buried within arcane terminology, and obfuscated by contractual encryption.

Bitcoin is not a currency, it is a published token of a private intellectual property. Offering a Bitcoin product for bitcoin that has no currency attached to it is simply barter. I suspect that trustless contracts will be designed without ever needing any arbitration. Anonymity will remain secure, and profits will be made with none-the-wiser. Opportunities to invest in enterprises can open up based on social networking and rating systems. P2P transactions, decentralized exchanges, and a transparent but pseudonymous (plausibly anonymous) ledger should even make inside traders weep with joy. It may seem risky to many of us to defy financial laws, but those outmoded laws serve no purpose for transactions that could not benefit from them anyway. Even barter is still subject to taxation, so that should be the only legal obligation.

BTW if you haven't seen this, it's probably one of the best takes on the future of bitcoin
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2GiQEECNcZM
Jon Matonis on Max Keiser May 31, 2011.

Any significantly advanced cryptocurrency is indistinguishable from Ponzi Tulips.
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction. Advertise here.
benjamindees
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1288


View Profile
March 26, 2012, 05:18:05 PM
 #2

You still haven't defined what you believe 'currency' means.

Civil Liberty Through Complex Mathematics
cbeast
Donator
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1722

Let's talk governance, lipstick, and pigs.


View Profile
March 26, 2012, 05:29:32 PM
 #3

You still haven't defined what you believe 'currency' means.
The burden of proof lies upon the person positing the argument for identifying a currency. I would like to see a good argument defining Bitcoin as a currency, but as yet have not. I am much more comfortable positing Bitcoin as a publication with no more value than any other publication, except to which an individual might barter for it.

Any significantly advanced cryptocurrency is indistinguishable from Ponzi Tulips.
TECSHARE
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2002


Welcome to Bitcoin Stalk


View Profile
March 30, 2012, 03:18:24 PM
 #4

I think the real question is....is it both, and if by law it is both a currency and a publication what restrictions could possibly be argued for? Does 1st amendment free speech protection apply to this? Which has the greater value, freedom of speech or tax policy? Will the status quo fat cats agree with you?

BITCOINTALK STAFF SELECTIVELY ENFORCE THE RULES IN AN ATTEMPT TO CREATE A CHILL EFFECT AND PERMANENTLY REMOVE ME AND OTHERS FROM THIS FORUM AS RETALIATION FOR SPEAKING OUT ABOUT THEIR ABUSIVE BEHAVIOR, AND THAT OF THEIR PERSONAL CLIQUES.
Pages: [1]
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Sponsored by , a Bitcoin-accepting VPN.
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!