dice.ninja - Now with Plinko!

[MadZ]

I could never understand how these reports work, I have 9 posts with a math-defying 25% accuracy.

Of your 9 reported posts, 8 were given a verdict by moderators and one wasn't. It didn't count for or against your accuracy.

Edit: then again, that link tells me "You have reported 3 posts with 0% accuracy"; it seems none of my reports were deemed to be "accurate".  

If all 3 of them were reported recently, it could simply mean that no verdict has been given yet. I'm not sure how active the moderation team is with reports, but that is entirely possible.

BB37BB has been banned and nuked too:

Autoban user: N/A in topic #0 by member #390122
Nuke user: N/A in topic #0 by member #390122

( https://bitcointalk.org/modlog.php )

It's a bit of a shame new accounts are no longer restricted to the beginner's & help section like they used to be. At least he would have to wait a few hours between accounts.

[suchmoon]

[ persistent little fucker ]

Let's see if we can nuke this one in record time.

[dooglus]

[ persistent little fucker ]

Let's see if we can nuke this one in record time.

Yup:

Nuke user: N/A in topic #0 by member #390249

[Minnlo]

Hopefully BB will now understand that creating another new account to evade the ban doesn't work, and will stop doing that again.

[MadZ]

[ persistent little fucker ]

Let's see if we can nuke this one in record time.

Yup:

Nuke user: N/A in topic #0 by member #390249

Seems he has already registered three new accounts (judging by their names).

MonkeyBB
BBMoss
MadBBal

All created one after another.

[suchmoon]

[ persistent little fucker ]

Let's see if we can nuke this one in record time.

Yup:

Nuke user: N/A in topic #0 by member #390249

Seems he has already registered three new accounts (judging by their names).

MonkeyBB
BBMoss
MadBBal

All created one after another.

It's that lack of creativity that will be the end of him... Thanks for the links, will wait until he posts something. AFAIK it's not against the rules to register alts for banned accounts, but it's against the rules to post outside Meta with those alts.

[MadZ]

[ persistent little fucker ]

Let's see if we can nuke this one in record time.

Yup:

Nuke user: N/A in topic #0 by member #390249

Seems he has already registered three new accounts (judging by their names).

MonkeyBB
BBMoss
MadBBal

All created one after another.

It's that lack of creativity that will be the end of him... Thanks for the links, will wait until he posts something. AFAIK it's not against the rules to register alts for banned accounts, but it's against the rules to post outside Meta with those alts.

It really doesn't matter what he names his accounts. His posting style makes it pretty obvious who he is.

[dooglus]

It really doesn't matter what he names his accounts. His posting style makes it pretty obvious who he is.

True.

He's on the moneypot.com chat as "WinkV" but it only takes a few lines for it to become clear who he is. Apparently he's been a mod on these forums since before bitcoin even existed, wants to tell people I'm "the silk road bandit" and wants to chop me with a chopstick.

Ho hum.

WinkV: i'm still puzzled by the whole thing
WinkV: its beyond absurd me being a mod myself lol
WinkV: since before bitcoin even existed!
WinkV: make fun of noobs like you
WinkV: watch
WinkV: ongoing shitstorm
WinkV: you setting yourself up
WinkV: just remember you did it to yourself
WinkV: who is we?
WinkV: i'm putting the word out you are a scammer
WinkV: i have a reputation go fuck yourself
WinkV: you havemany funs coming to you
WinkV: yeah see where this gets you
WinkV: why is bitcoin dropping like a rock..dooglus
WinkV: steve you can thank for all this lol
WinkV: now i'm not stopping until i'm paid i called the aclu
WinkV: so we will seee what happens lol
WinkV: dooglus was the scammers sidekick
WinkV: so i tell the SEC and FTC he was the silk road bandit
WinkV: better think of something
WinkV: obviously this backfired
WinkV: yes dooglus i know about your darkweb shit
WinkV: you have fun explanining this away
WinkV: you fucked off thanks to steve
WinkV: so steve i see you want to punk out now?
WinkV: i don't get it
WinkV: so i'll just report you too whatever
WinkV: seemed fishy anyways
WinkV: you all seemedlike scammers
WinkV: so thats fine
WinkV: no dice.ninja
WinkV: i'm looking for the scammers lol
WinkV: have fun with the fallout
WinkV: dooglus is going to have fun in court
WinkV: i'm kidding it will ot be fun
WinkV: you are going to lost
WinkV: dooglus is such many scams
WinkV: its fact
WinkV: he must go man jails
WinkV: he so liar
WinkV: chop puppet with chopsyick
WinkV: chop that sock monkey\

[Dabs]

ahh. hahahahahahahahha.

doog, serious question: anything wrong with offering 1.56% house edge? (higher than 1%, but lower than satoshi dice's 1.9%.) and matching kelly.

[dooglus]

anything wrong with offering 1.56% house edge? (higher than 1%, but lower than satoshi dice's 1.9%.) and matching kelly.

No, but why would anyone play your 1.56% edge game when there are reputable 1% edge games available?

Almost nobody plays satoshidice any more, because they don't want to pay double the house edge of the other games. Why put yourself at a disadvantage?

[a1choi]

can a mod close this thread as this site has been closed?

[Dabs]

anything wrong with offering 1.56% house edge? (higher than 1%, but lower than satoshi dice's 1.9%.) and matching kelly.

No, but why would anyone play your 1.56% edge game when there are reputable 1% edge games available?

Almost nobody plays satoshidice any more, because they don't want to pay double the house edge of the other games. Why put yourself at a disadvantage?

Well, it's not the same dice site as everyone else. It's my 64 blocks game, the winner gets 63x. It would be a bit odd to offer 63.36x what you bet to the winner. I just thought it was easier to compute 63/64.

You can only bet on a per block basis, so that's 1.56% each.

It will be a unique game. For the next two weeks. Until someone else copies the concept. Then I can and probably will have to drop the house edge.

can a mod close this thread as this site has been closed?

I'm not a mod, but I think we've just hijacked the thread now.

[Seketsuna]

can a mod close this thread as this site has been closed?

yah, coz right now the lasts posts are just trash from BBmmBB and he need to be banned.

[enryk]

can a mod close this thread as this site has been closed?

yah, coz right now the lasts posts are just trash from BBmmBB and he need to be banned.

There was another moderated thread on the forum. Can't find the link now.

[wayshegoes]

anything wrong with offering 1.56% house edge? (higher than 1%, but lower than satoshi dice's 1.9%.) and matching kelly.

No, but why would anyone play your 1.56% edge game when there are reputable 1% edge games available?

Almost nobody plays satoshidice any more, because they don't want to pay double the house edge of the other games. Why put yourself at a disadvantage?

Well, it's not the same dice site as everyone else. It's my 64 blocks game, the winner gets 63x. It would be a bit odd to offer 63.36x what you bet to the winner. I just thought it was easier to compute 63/64.

You can only bet on a per block basis, so that's 1.56% each.

It will be a unique game. For the next two weeks. Until someone else copies the concept. Then I can and probably will have to drop the house edge.

Nobody will gamble at higher than 1% edge because they want the best chances they can at winning money.

[caga]

anything wrong with offering 1.56% house edge? (higher than 1%, but lower than satoshi dice's 1.9%.) and matching kelly.

No, but why would anyone play your 1.56% edge game when there are reputable 1% edge games available?

Almost nobody plays satoshidice any more, because they don't want to pay double the house edge of the other games. Why put yourself at a disadvantage?

Well, it's not the same dice site as everyone else. It's my 64 blocks game, the winner gets 63x. It would be a bit odd to offer 63.36x what you bet to the winner. I just thought it was easier to compute 63/64.

You can only bet on a per block basis, so that's 1.56% each.

It will be a unique game. For the next two weeks. Until someone else copies the concept. Then I can and probably will have to drop the house edge.

Nobody will gamble at higher than 1% edge because they want the best chances they can at winning money.

Some people just don't mind if its a little more than 1% edge. Its all about the game. If they get addicted to it , then 2% is fine.

[superSTAR777]

The logic is simple

trusted site + low house edge will have 100x more probability than

less trusted site + bigger house edge

Good luck gamblers

[CoinCollect]

The logic is simple

trusted site + low house edge will have 100x more probability than

less trusted site + bigger house edge

Good luck gamblers

give me my 10$ back first you fuckin scammer.

[Dabs]

Some people just don't mind if its a little more than 1% edge. Its all about the game. If they get addicted to it , then 2% is fine.

I'll probably start it at 1.56% like I said. I can always lower it later. The chance to win in the game is dependent on how many blocks you select. (If you pick half the blocks, then you have 50% chance to win.)

[seedtrue]

anything wrong with offering 1.56% house edge? (higher than 1%, but lower than satoshi dice's 1.9%.) and matching kelly.

No, but why would anyone play your 1.56% edge game when there are reputable 1% edge games available?

Almost nobody plays satoshidice any more, because they don't want to pay double the house edge of the other games. Why put yourself at a disadvantage?

TBH, I do not think the majority of gamblers even know what a "house edge" is. I have friends that still think slot machines at our Indian Casino are beatable.