Bitcoin Forum
April 26, 2024, 07:52:29 AM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 27.0 [Torrent]
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  
Pages: [1]
  Print  
Author Topic: A new type of moderator?  (Read 1348 times)
Fiyasko (OP)
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1428
Merit: 1001


Okey Dokey Lokey


View Profile
March 30, 2012, 04:51:30 PM
 #1

I've been seeing alot of  "scammy" behavour of the threads lately... I feel that there should be someone on duty to watch for scammers...
A nice new moderator type called the "scamwatch"
eh? im sure the mods are getting tired of cleaning up scam threads atop thier normal duties

http://bitcoin-otc.com/viewratingdetail.php?nick=DingoRabiit&sign=ANY&type=RECV <-My Ratings
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=857670.0 GAWminers and associated things are not to be trusted, Especially the "mineral" exchange
1714117949
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1714117949

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1714117949
Reply with quote  #2

1714117949
Report to moderator
"Governments are good at cutting off the heads of a centrally controlled networks like Napster, but pure P2P networks like Gnutella and Tor seem to be holding their own." -- Satoshi
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction.
BitMatch
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 12
Merit: 0


View Profile
March 30, 2012, 04:55:26 PM
 #2

I nominate:

  • Matthew N. Wright (duh)
  • LoupGaroux
  • DeathAndTaxes
  • Phinnaeus Gage
terrytibbs
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 560
Merit: 501



View Profile
March 30, 2012, 05:04:57 PM
 #3

Stupid idea. I'd rather everyone report suspected scamming using the built-in feature.
Phinnaeus Gage
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1918
Merit: 1570


Bitcoin: An Idea Worth Spending


View Profile WWW
March 30, 2012, 05:06:42 PM
 #4

I've been seeing alot of  "scammy" behavour of the threads lately... I feel that there should be someone on duty to watch for scammers...
A nice new moderator type called the "scamwatch"
eh? im sure the mods are getting tired of cleaning up scam threads atop thier normal duties

I nominate:

  • Matthew N. Wright (duh)
  • LoupGaroux
  • DeathAndTaxes
  • Phinnaeus Gage

Stupid idea. I'd rather everyone report suspected scamming using the built-in feature.

Wait, what? There's a built-in feature? Why didn't I get the memo?

~Cackling Bear~
BitMatch
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 12
Merit: 0


View Profile
March 30, 2012, 05:08:40 PM
 #5

Stupid idea. I'd rather everyone report suspected scamming using the built-in feature.

Of course everyone would report it, just like everyone reports off-topic posts. The moderator would be the one coming in to check the reports and keep a watchful eye for the times when no reports are given.
Raoul Duke
aka psy
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1358
Merit: 1002



View Profile
March 30, 2012, 05:14:34 PM
 #6

I nominate:

  • Matthew N. Wright (duh)
  • LoupGaroux
  • DeathAndTaxes
  • Phinnaeus Gage

Yeah, right...

ScamWatch, when scammers can scam.  Roll Eyes
BadBear
v2.0
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1652
Merit: 1127



View Profile WWW
March 30, 2012, 05:30:30 PM
 #7

Seems a little heavy handed, particularly since it's people that haven't scammed yet. I got nothing against asking hard questions, and warning people if they can't answer them, or have reason to believe they are scamming. It just shouldn't be backed by the forum, seems a little unfair.

1Kz25jm6pjNTaz8bFezEYUeBYfEtpjuKRG | PGP: B5797C4F

Tired of annoying signature ads? Ad block for signatures
theymos
Administrator
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 5180
Merit: 12890


View Profile
March 30, 2012, 06:30:44 PM
 #8

im sure the mods are getting tired of cleaning up scam threads atop thier normal duties

They usually don't, and they're certainly not required to. Dealing with scammers is a complex, messy issue unrelated to forum moderation. It should be done by third-parties.

1NXYoJ5xU91Jp83XfVMHwwTUyZFK64BoAD
John (John K.)
Global Troll-buster and
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1288
Merit: 1225


Away on an extended break


View Profile
March 31, 2012, 03:41:53 AM
 #9

Seems a little heavy handed, particularly since it's people that haven't scammed yet. I got nothing against asking hard questions, and warning people if they can't answer them, or have reason to believe they are scamming. It just shouldn't be backed by the forum, seems a little unfair.

I prefer the "asking hard questions" approach. If they don't give a plausible answer, it's most likely a scam.
Pages: [1]
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!