MULTIWALLET/Trusted-Cryptos group/Multiple Coin Support/MultiShift/Fiat Trading

[Griffith]

Thanks for clarifying.  So it is the "GG-Dev Team" that's working on reviewing supercoin's code and if is promising you work on it as a separate coin or will attempt to incorporate features from mwc and other cryptocurrencdoes?

GG refers to griffith (me) and groupo( MdtSpain). we will be reviewing it today. that is the first step. i will post more once we have.

[Cryptco]

How can you secure the In-Wallet trading??

Please give me more information about the security issues regarding In-Wallet trading
and transaction process of Multiwalletcoin as it is not open source

[Crestington]

The coin name really, really sux. No way chance for mainstream adoption, for multiple reasons.

reasons?

Actually I'm not too fond of the name either, I mentioned it a few pages back. A creative and easily marketable name helps quite a bit.

Manibillfold? ManifoldCoin? Billfold? BillfoldCoin? Manifold? Coinfold? CaissonCoin?

I guess if I were to change the name I would go with ManifoldCoin as it means many folding coins.

[Griffith]

How can you secure the In-Wallet trading??

Please give me more information about the security issues regarding In-Wallet trading
and transaction process of Multiwalletcoin as it is not open source

secure? its essentially...in order to use the exchange you need an account on the exchange. (duh). under your account under settings there is an option for an api key. this is an ecrypted key sent over http post protocols that the server will read and interpret in order to preform actions on your account without you logging into the site and doing it on there.

this means that using the api key you can ask the server to sell a coin at a price from the wallet. the request will send. the server will get it. it will see that it is your key, and will preform the action for your account.
you can use someone elses account if you have all there api key info. so this should be kept private. same principle as that you wouldnt want to post your bank login info on the internet.
api key will be stored locally on your computer. not in the wallet. and not on a server. this is most secure.


as far as im aware we dont have any actual security issues with in wallet trading. im not sure where you got that notion from

[mdtspain]

How can you secure the In-Wallet trading??

Please give me more information about the security issues regarding In-Wallet trading
and transaction process of Multiwalletcoin as it is not open source

The in wallet trading is on the exchanges (Cryptsy, Bittrex, Poloniex...). For security reasons we will NOT enable depossits or withdraws from the wallet. Withdraws need to be done on the Exchange. As allways we advise you to use 2FA.

If you use the in wallet trading, you will need to insert your public and private api key from the exchange you want to trade on. You will need an account on that exchange. These keys will be stored in the program as long as the wallet is opened. If you close the wallet, then you will have to provide them again.

These keys are encrypted conform the rules of the Exchanges and used when API calls are made with the Exchanges.

One of the reasons why we will keep the code will closed is security.

[Griffith]

How can you secure the In-Wallet trading??

Please give me more information about the security issues regarding In-Wallet trading
and transaction process of Multiwalletcoin as it is not open source

The in wallet trading is on the exchanges (Cryptsy, Bittrex, Poloniex...). For security reasons we will NOT enable depossits or withdraws from the wallet. Withdraws need to be done on the Exchange. As allways we advise you to use 2FA.

If you use the in wallet trading, you will need to insert your public and private api key from the exchange you want to trade on. You will need an account on that exchange. These keys will be stored in the program as long as the wallet is opened. If you close the wallet, then you will have to provide them again.

These keys are encrypted conform the rules of the Exchanges and used when API calls are made with the Exchanges.

One of the reasons why we will keep the code will closed is security.

i can have the wallet store the keys locally the same way google chrome would do it. re-entering wont be needed

[lar0che]

Agree do not make this open source keep it locked up really good.  One of the huge issues is security and opening it up to everyone gives everyone the opportunity to poke holes in it.

[alexius89]

Congratulation to the Twitter competion winner! We sent the prize already :-)

Cheers

[oldnoob]

The coin name really, really sux. No way chance for mainstream adoption, for multiple reasons.

True. If the same things (very good work from devs here) were done to lets say BitcoinPlus (XBC). It would have gone through the roof. Told this before, wish you guys luck. Tip contact XBC dev and see if coins can combine force. Then you will see some results from hard work. 

[sovie]

The time for changing names has long since passed,
plans, logos and indeed the very ideaoligy itself lends itself to the
the name multiwallet which used to be the old multiwalletcoin.

The very reason we picked this coin was its name and ideas and it
strikes me quite odd that only now after all this time does a call
for a name change come in by 2 individuals.
We don't believe its in the interests of the coin
or that the community at large would be in favour to upend all the plans made
and that are in process with other external parties to now fundamentally
make such a change and set our progress back severley.

We are looking forward and marching to the inevitable change of how
business will be done for the better in cryptocurrency and we duly invite
anyone interested in this ambition to join us, as there is no going back now!
 

[MiningMinion]

THere's a Proof of Honor nomination going on and it could give you some exposure.

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=855130.0

[Lovethecoins]

The time for changing names has long since passed,
plans, logos and indeed the very ideaoligy itself lends itself to the
the name multiwallet which used to be the old multiwalletcoin.

The very reason we picked this coin was its name and ideas and it
strikes me quite odd that only now after all this time does a call
for a name change come in by 2 individuals.
We don't believe its in the interests of the coin
or that the community at large would be in favour to upend all the plans made
and that are in process with other external parties to now fundamentally
make such a change and set our progress back severley.

We are looking forward and marching to the inevitable change of how
business will be done for the better in cryptocurrency and we duly invite
anyone interested in this ambition to join us, as there is no going back now!
 

I am with you... I am done with coins that change names/logos every couple weeks and expect that will help the market... that is pointless nonsense.... keep working on creating a sound coin   innovation innovation innovation ... I also agree with POD or POH it helps with exposure...

[mdtspain]

So let go voting... "I would like to nominate Griffith + https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=752808
on https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=855130.0

[Crestington]

The time for changing names has long since passed,
plans, logos and indeed the very ideaoligy itself lends itself to the
the name multiwallet which used to be the old multiwalletcoin.

The very reason we picked this coin was its name and ideas and it
strikes me quite odd that only now after all this time does a call
for a name change come in by 2 individuals.
We don't believe its in the interests of the coin
or that the community at large would be in favour to upend all the plans made
and that are in process with other external parties to now fundamentally
make such a change and set our progress back severley.

We are looking forward and marching to the inevitable change of how
business will be done for the better in cryptocurrency and we duly invite
anyone interested in this ambition to join us, as there is no going back now!
 

I just said I wasn't crazy about the name and offered up some alternatives I thought might fit better while trying to stay inline with the goals of the Coin. Rebranding is ALOT of work so if it were to happen, it would have to be done early on but the name MultiWalletCoin isn't really something that would turn people off anyways, not like it's called RapeCoin or CryptoMeth, my point was that in terms of marketing it might offer a bit more of an advantage.

[xxxgoodgirls]

Cool coin, watching.

[Cryptco]

yes i think we need a better logo and we should pay a professional to do it from community funds
   

[doc12]

I think we already have a quite cool new logo (from the logo contest two months ago). It will be changed with the next wallet update ... ?!?! 

[sovie]

I think we already have a quite cool new logo (from the logo contest two months ago). It will be changed with the next wallet update ... ?!?!  

Yes there is a different logo and we got a proffessional to help out as well
and yes it should be inculded in the next wallet redesign.
We are also working on a new ann update will most likely include the new logo
and a number of other cool stuff.
There are a number of initiatives in the works and i'm hoping in the next 10 days
or so they will bare fruit for us all.

keep minting

[mdtspain]

In wallet trading update

We are in the final stage from the development for the in wallet trading fase1. Al the code has been written from "0", we are now testing the whole trading module for the Cryptsy Exchange on Windows, Mac and Linux, hoping to find some bugs that accure for the different operating systems, that we than can try to resolve.

Now that we have written the complete code for the Cryptsy Exchange, we can adapt that easy for other Exchanges. Most of the Exchanges have minor differences that can be adapted and then tested.

We have decided to launch the first version with 2 Exchanges (Cryptsy and Bittrex). This means we need to launch a new wallet. Additional Exchanges require again a new wallet, unless we make wallets with and wallets without the in wallet trading.

We would like to hear from you all, what Exchanges you would like to see added to the MWC wallet.

[doc12]

I think poloniex and bter would be a good choice ...