Need help with key generation

[iron man]

My question is why do you have a massive list of private keys? I don't see any use for this other then to mine potential brain wallets hoping that someone will send funds to one of your addresses.

yeah, why?

this is a misuse of electrum...imported keys cannot be restored from seed.  defeats the point of a deterministic wallet.

yeah, why have a massive list of it?

[BurtW]

My question is why do you have a massive list of private keys? I don't see any use for this other then to mine potential brain wallets hoping that someone will send funds to one of your addresses.

yeah, why?

this is a misuse of electrum...imported keys cannot be restored from seed.  defeats the point of a deterministic wallet.

yeah, why have a massive list of it?

He explained exactly what he is trying to do in the thread, which you obviously did not read.

OP:  How is it going?  Did you ever get all of the 2³² addresess generated?  Did you find any BTC? 

[pandalion98]

My question is why do you have a massive list of private keys? I don't see any use for this other then to mine potential brain wallets hoping that someone will send funds to one of your addresses.

yeah, why?

this is a misuse of electrum...imported keys cannot be restored from seed.  defeats the point of a deterministic wallet.

yeah, why have a massive list of it?

He explained exactly what he is trying to do in the thread, which you obviously did not read.

OP:  How is it going?  Did you ever get all of the 2³² addresess generated?  Did you find any BTC? 

Here's the report...

Seems like everyone is using good RNG's. I already submitted the paper to my recipient.

Final stats:
* 22,219,774 total addresses generated (from privkey 0). List contains the info in this format (no quotes):
------ "address , privkey-in-hex"
* BTC 0.0006000 found in dust outputs (did not bother getting them. most were 1 to 10 satoshi outputs)
* Found BTC 0.0101092 in address 16QaFeudRUt8NYy2yzjm3BMvG4xBbAsBFM (privkey 0)
------ Cannot spend due to a quirk in the bitcoin system/wallet software/base58 decoding scheme

My research is finished for now.


p.s. Do you know someone/do you have a list of all addresses used?
Or a list of just addresses with balances would be nice (up to block 321341)

[amaclin]

Final stats:
* 22,219,774 total addresses generated (from privkey 0). List contains the info in this format (no quotes):
------ "address , privkey-in-hex"
* BTC 0.0006000 found in dust outputs (did not bother getting them. most were 1 to 10 satoshi outputs)
* Found BTC 0.0101092 in address 16QaFeudRUt8NYy2yzjm3BMvG4xBbAsBFM (privkey 0)
------ Cannot spend due to a quirk in the bitcoin system/wallet software/base58 decoding scheme

I do not believe.

p.s. Do you know someone/do you have a list of all addresses used?
Or a list of just addresses with balances would be nice (up to block 321341)

It is not a problem to create list of used in blockchain addresses. I did it several times in past. Right now I do not have up-to-date copy.
There were around ~40 mln standard addresses used right now. (~1 gb in plaintext)
There are also thousands of msig-addresses (which starts with '3')

[pandalion98]

Final stats:
* 22,219,774 total addresses generated (from privkey 0). List contains the info in this format (no quotes):
------ "address , privkey-in-hex"
* BTC 0.0006000 found in dust outputs (did not bother getting them. most were 1 to 10 satoshi outputs)
* Found BTC 0.0101092 in address 16QaFeudRUt8NYy2yzjm3BMvG4xBbAsBFM (privkey 0)
------ Cannot spend due to a quirk in the bitcoin system/wallet software/base58 decoding scheme

I do not believe.

What exactly?

[amaclin]

What exactly?

Sorry, my fault.
directory.io says that the addresses for [000..000] are 1MsHWS1BnwMc3tLE8G35UXsS58fKipzB7a / 1Q1pE5vPGEEMqRcVRMbtBK842Y6Pzo6nK9
I do not know how to calculate public key for invalid privateKey

16QaFeudRUt8NYy2yzjm3BMvG4xBbAsBFM also known as "address for zero-key"

Let me sweep unspent dust outputs? 
Reducing the number of uxto - is good!

[BurtW]

If I remember correctly zero is not a valid pivate key.  One is the first valid private key and results is G (G = 1*G). Two is G+G, three is G+G+G, four is G+G+G+G, etc.  It should be very easy and very fast to create all the public keys for the private keys 1 through 2³²:  start with G then keep adding G and store away the sums and hash each sum for the addresses.

[pandalion98]

If I remember correctly zero is not a valid pivate key. 

Exactly. People sent BTC to this address, but no one can spend it. yet 

[HELP.org]

Not sure if this will help you.  I believe it is on Github:

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=107172.0

[pandalion98]

Not sure if this will help you.  I believe it is on Github:

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=107172.0

Nah. I'm already finished with my project.