I think you both did not get what I wanted to say
I am not preaching for any kind of centralization
I just asked is it possible that miners switch their duties
of writing current transactions in newly mined block
miner A mines new hash
broadcasts that he found it
then miner B is is chosen at random
he will use this new found hash to create a block
miner A gets his reward and fees
in the long run, there is no extra unpaid work,
just the miner with most hashing power would not be able to write latest blocks
if again, i got it wrong, I won't post here any more
how do you distinguish between different miners?
how do you choose at random in a anonymous possible hostile distributed system?
do you really think that miners would pause the generating blocks, just because he/she/they found one,
and oh btw. miners just don't create blocks, they try millions(and more) different ones to find one that "fits".
your posts shows lack of knowledge, please go read some more.
you cant write something in a block, without changing it.
please stop asking questions that shows that you know nothing about how stuff work.
go read some more and find out why you are failing.
Way to go, O' Superior One.
-1, no he should be in the newbie forum, not in the technical forum.
i would have(maybe...) been more polite to him in the newbie forum, but he thinks he know something he does not.
he is not seeking knowledge, or asks to gets something to be explained to him. NO! he suggests something stupid, without knowing how stuff works(or even wants to know, judging by his posts). Thats why i kicked his balls... and NO! you can not make me feel bad about doing it, by giving me a "-1", or making fun of my superiorness.