acceptbtc (OP)
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 7
Merit: 0
|
|
April 09, 2012, 01:08:38 AM Last edit: April 09, 2012, 12:00:48 PM by acceptbtc |
|
We are building the Bitcoin's first truly integrated marketplace, while tackling some of the biggest issues and concerns regarding Bitcoins. Please read and tell us what you think. Long Form: http://goo.gl/E4Ci7Less detailed, imageform: http://imgur.com/UuTqISignup: http://classfy.com
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Even in the event that an attacker gains more than 50% of the network's
computational power, only transactions sent by the attacker could be
reversed or double-spent. The network would not be destroyed.
|
|
|
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction.
|
|
|
|
copumpkin
Donator
Sr. Member
Offline
Activity: 266
Merit: 252
I'm actually a pineapple
|
|
April 09, 2012, 01:38:29 AM Last edit: April 09, 2012, 01:54:14 AM by copumpkin |
|
The plan looks promising! Feel free to ignore them, but I have a couple of nitpicky suggestions about your promotional image: The typography is kind of wonky, and it's a bit jarring to the eyes: - The weights aren't consistent across or even within glyphs: check the right of the lowercase 'a' or of an uppercase 'B', or see how the 'w' appears heavier than characters adjacent to it.
- The kerning is a little funny: for example, "forum" appears to almost be two words, "for" "um".
- Ligatures are turned off, so the "ffi" in "sufficient" gets overlappy and look a little messy.
- You have a slightly different color (dark gray) for most occurrences of the word "Bitcoin" near the beginning, but near the end you stop.
You also have "it's" where "its" belongs, and I'd replace the "Without it" at the end with "Otherwise," or something to that effect (what's the "it"?).
|
|
|
|
Scott J
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1792
Merit: 1000
|
|
April 09, 2012, 12:43:59 PM |
|
Sounds good, I'm interested to see how this will develop.
|
|
|
|
Nefario
|
|
April 09, 2012, 01:11:55 PM |
|
How is this different to BitMit?
|
PGP key id at pgp.mit.edu 0xA68F4B7C To get help and support for GLBSE please email support@glbse.com
|
|
|
Matthew N. Wright
Untrustworthy
Hero Member
Offline
Activity: 588
Merit: 500
Hero VIP ultra official trusted super staff puppet
|
|
April 09, 2012, 05:02:12 PM |
|
have you tried using bitmit? its seems like using a sandpaper condom...
I hear Atlas does that. He likes it rough® We are building the Bitcoin's first truly integrated marketplace
Yay. Another person referring to themselves in the third person and incapable of saying "I am".
|
|
|
|
Nefario
|
|
April 09, 2012, 05:27:40 PM |
|
I'm
|
PGP key id at pgp.mit.edu 0xA68F4B7C To get help and support for GLBSE please email support@glbse.com
|
|
|
skayl
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 6
Merit: 0
|
|
April 09, 2012, 05:28:32 PM Last edit: February 18, 2013, 12:41:58 AM by skayl |
|
.
|
|
|
|
Matthew N. Wright
Untrustworthy
Hero Member
Offline
Activity: 588
Merit: 500
Hero VIP ultra official trusted super staff puppet
|
|
April 09, 2012, 05:35:28 PM |
|
|
|
|
|
Matthew N. Wright
Untrustworthy
Hero Member
Offline
Activity: 588
Merit: 500
Hero VIP ultra official trusted super staff puppet
|
|
April 09, 2012, 06:07:41 PM |
|
nothing wrong with a little internet humor... https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=41592.80Bitmit seems like it has really gained traction in the last couple of months, what has been the response from the trade sections of this forum? Maybe reach out to tokashi, and ask him what some of the challenges have been. Ultimately we all want btc to thrive, and better to work together... Bitmit is great but I see a fundamental problem with many bitcoin services not just bitmit. Many of them are clearly aimed at Bitcoin users, who are usually techies and early adopters. Before Square came along, accepting credit cards was very difficult and you had to go the bank..ect. But now anyone can start accepting credit cards without even thinking about it. This is the kind experience we are creating. We want people to use bitcoins without them even knowing it. You keep saying "we". Who is "we"?
|
|
|
|
|