Bitcoin Forum
May 12, 2024, 07:50:26 AM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 27.0 [Torrent]
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  
Pages: [1]
  Print  
Author Topic: Network bandwidth utilization of mining  (Read 1151 times)
promojo (OP)
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 420
Merit: 250


View Profile
September 02, 2014, 12:01:17 AM
 #1

I have not run any base line tests but would be interested in what other people have seen out in the wild.  Looking at finding out how much bandwidth say 5 TH/s will consume in a month on average?   Thanks in advance.
1715500226
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1715500226

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1715500226
Reply with quote  #2

1715500226
Report to moderator
1715500226
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1715500226

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1715500226
Reply with quote  #2

1715500226
Report to moderator
1715500226
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1715500226

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1715500226
Reply with quote  #2

1715500226
Report to moderator
Even if you use Bitcoin through Tor, the way transactions are handled by the network makes anonymity difficult to achieve. Do not expect your transactions to be anonymous unless you really know what you're doing.
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction.
1715500226
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1715500226

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1715500226
Reply with quote  #2

1715500226
Report to moderator
1715500226
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1715500226

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1715500226
Reply with quote  #2

1715500226
Report to moderator
1715500226
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1715500226

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1715500226
Reply with quote  #2

1715500226
Report to moderator
Taugeran
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 658
Merit: 500


CCNA: There i fixed the internet.


View Profile
September 02, 2014, 02:12:08 AM
 #2

Is this mining at a pool or solo?

To feed 5Th/s:

The now deprecated get work protocol would require some where in the neighborhood of 1.25Mbps


      With the proper difficulty setting of 4096:
The stratum protocol would amount to at most 5kbps but in all likeliness it would be well below 2kbps, or almost 1000 less traffic


This is due to the fact stratum allows for local work derivation from the data sent from the upstream server

Bitfury HW & Habañero : 1.625Th/s
tips/Donations: 1NoS89H3Mr6U5CmP4VwWzU2318JEMxHL1
Come join Coinbase
notlist3d
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1456
Merit: 1000



View Profile
September 02, 2014, 02:43:50 AM
 #3

I don't see bandwidth being a problem for most.  You will run into heat far before bandwidth.
promojo (OP)
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 420
Merit: 250


View Profile
September 02, 2014, 04:11:10 AM
 #4

Is this mining at a pool or solo?

To feed 5Th/s:

The now deprecated get work protocol would require some where in the neighborhood of 1.25Mbps


      With the proper difficulty setting of 4096:
The stratum protocol would amount to at most 5kbps but in all likeliness it would be well below 2kbps, or almost 1000 less traffic


This is due to the fact stratum allows for local work derivation from the data sent from the upstream server


I assume doing it solo would require significantly more bandwidth.  But that is interesting how efficient stratum appears to be. 
promojo (OP)
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 420
Merit: 250


View Profile
September 02, 2014, 04:11:45 AM
 #5

I don't see bandwidth being a problem for most.  You will run into heat far before bandwidth.

Or KWh to the dmarc.
Taugeran
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 658
Merit: 500


CCNA: There i fixed the internet.


View Profile
September 02, 2014, 06:47:50 AM
 #6

Is this mining at a pool or solo?

To feed 5Th/s:

The now deprecated get work protocol would require some where in the neighborhood of 1.25Mbps


      With the proper difficulty setting of 4096:
The stratum protocol would amount to at most 5kbps but in all likeliness it would be well below 2kbps, or almost 1000 less traffic


This is due to the fact stratum allows for local work derivation from the data sent from the upstream server


I assume doing it solo would require significantly more bandwidth.  But that is interesting how efficient stratum appears to be. 


Not necessarily. Solo mining can be setup using getwork protocol or a third protocol : getblocktemplate which as it's name suggests; instead of sending block headers(work items) ready to go like stratum(which allows some mutability) and getwork do, GBT sends an array of all the data presently available on the bitcoin network) needed to create your own block headers a la changing which transactions are in there which coinbase to use etc. it sounds complex and it is at first.


Solo can also be proxied via a pseudo pool to allow stratum connection:

Bitcoind<---Getwork--->Miner
Bitcoind<---Getblocktemplate--->Miner
Bitcoind<---GBT--->solopool SW<---Stratum--->Miner

Bitfury HW & Habañero : 1.625Th/s
tips/Donations: 1NoS89H3Mr6U5CmP4VwWzU2318JEMxHL1
Come join Coinbase
Pages: [1]
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!