Bitcoin Forum
December 16, 2017, 11:31:23 PM *
News: Latest stable version of Bitcoin Core: 0.15.1  [Torrent].
 
   Home   Help Search Donate Login Register  
Pages: [1] 2 »  All
  Print  
Author Topic: [2014-09-02] Hacker claims to have Jennifer Lawerence sex tape  (Read 3803 times)
epere
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 364


View Profile
September 02, 2014, 04:05:25 AM
 #1

http://www.irishexaminer.com/breakingnews/entertainment/hacker-claims-to-have-jennifer-lawerence-sex-tape-640808.html

The person has stated they will post the videos in return for PayPal donations and they have already posted a PayPal email online which can be used to donate cash. They have also posted 'screenshots' of a screen featuring several the videos in an effort to prove the authenticity of their claims.

1513467083
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1513467083

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1513467083
Reply with quote  #2

1513467083
Report to moderator
1513467083
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1513467083

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1513467083
Reply with quote  #2

1513467083
Report to moderator
1513467083
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1513467083

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1513467083
Reply with quote  #2

1513467083
Report to moderator
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction. Advertise here.
1513467083
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1513467083

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1513467083
Reply with quote  #2

1513467083
Report to moderator
screwUdriver
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 197


ALGORY.io Crowdsale starts on 8/12/2017


View Profile
September 02, 2014, 04:08:18 AM
 #2

I read that he was asking for bitcoin donations, but had only received $150~ worth of bitcoin donated to him, and people were taking his pictures and passing them off as their own along with their own donation addresses.

cryptofan5
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 126


View Profile
September 02, 2014, 04:13:10 AM
 #3

I somehow don't understand what is a big deal? Of course the celebs are stupid enough to have their nude pics kept in icloud. But, if it was hacked, so what?
Remember remember the 5th of November
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1610

Reverse engineer from time to time


View Profile
September 02, 2014, 04:25:25 AM
 #4

I somehow don't understand what is a big deal? Of course the celebs are stupid enough to have their nude pics kept in icloud. But, if it was hacked, so what?
It would probably tarnish the name of Bitcoin in the process, even though the hacker could have provided a paypal address for fiat, just because bitcoin was requested, the news titles would scream "Bitcoin hackers extort celebrities"

BTC:1AiCRMxgf1ptVQwx6hDuKMu4f7F27QmJC2
marryXmas
Jr. Member
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 50


View Profile
September 02, 2014, 04:27:43 AM
 #5

I somehow don't understand what is a big deal? Of course the celebs are stupid enough to have their nude pics kept in icloud. But, if it was hacked, so what?
It would probably tarnish the name of Bitcoin in the process, even though the hacker could have provided a paypal address for fiat, just because bitcoin was requested, the news titles would scream "Bitcoin hackers extort celebrities"
It is just one more nefarious thing that bitcoin can be used for. I think it is already well known that people have/will use bitcoin to receive money anon because bitcoin allows that to happen.
Honeybooboo
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 354


View Profile
September 02, 2014, 09:18:01 AM
 #6

I'm sceptical the hacker will release any more pics or vids even if he has them. Apparently he was doxxed pretty easily and I'm sure the feds will be hot on his tail now.

I somehow don't understand what is a big deal? Of course the celebs are stupid enough to have their nude pics kept in icloud. But, if it was hacked, so what?

I don't think most of them were aware that they were stored there. I think they were just automatically stored there and hence why they never deleted them.
Kluge
Donator
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1218


Michael, send me some coins before I hitman you


View Profile
September 02, 2014, 09:24:21 AM
 #7

This should probably be in Off Topic.

Don't mix your coins someone said isn't legal
Honeybooboo
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 354


View Profile
September 02, 2014, 09:33:41 AM
 #8

This should probably be in Off Topic.

The article does actually mention bitcoin several times. Maybe op should include that since the headline seems to just suggest Paypal:

Quote
"People wanted s*** for free. Sure, I got $120 with my bitcoin address, but when you consider how much time was put into acquiring this stuff (i'm not the hacker, just a collector), and the money (i paid a lot via bitcoin as well to get certain sets when this stuff was being privately traded Friday/Saturday) I really didn't get close to what I was hoping."

"Mainly because of the extra bitcoin spammers spamming their own address.. taking my original posts and passing them off as their own to try and get bitcoin.. but also because of the skeptics. I proved I had s***, but people wanted more and more for free. Well, f**k, you can't get everything for free sometimes," he added.
Kluge
Donator
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1218


Michael, send me some coins before I hitman you


View Profile
September 02, 2014, 09:39:46 AM
 #9

This should probably be in Off Topic.

The article does actually mention bitcoin several times. Maybe op should include that since the headline seems to just suggest Paypal:

Quote
"People wanted s*** for free. Sure, I got $120 with my bitcoin address, but when you consider how much time was put into acquiring this stuff (i'm not the hacker, just a collector), and the money (i paid a lot via bitcoin as well to get certain sets when this stuff was being privately traded Friday/Saturday) I really didn't get close to what I was hoping."

"Mainly because of the extra bitcoin spammers spamming their own address.. taking my original posts and passing them off as their own to try and get bitcoin.. but also because of the skeptics. I proved I had s***, but people wanted more and more for free. Well, f**k, you can't get everything for free sometimes," he added.
It's fine it has bitcoin involved, but what's the relevance to Bitcoin? If article was about data-snatchers tending to take bitcoin and the implications, probably relevant, but I don't see how this particular story is any more relevant to Bitcoin than an article reporting someone stole a person's coffee and was trying to sell it for bitcoin. There are many articles in this subforum not really relevant to Bitcoin, but that seems to be by forum policy. *shrug*

Don't mix your coins someone said isn't legal
Kprawn
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1330


★Bitvest.io★ Play Plinko or Invest!


View Profile
September 02, 2014, 12:37:04 PM
 #10

You would be stupid to ask payment in bitcoin.  Angry

Transactions are on the blockchain and movement of the coins can be traced, up to the point, where the mixers are being used. {Then the courts will be drawn into this, to try and "force" them to reveal the route to the final destination.}

They should not have "video taped" or "photographed" themselves in the first place, now they making a huge deal out of this. {Once it's out there, it's public domain}

The fact that BTC was used, is irelevant, because it's just another method to pay someone. {Only difference, it's faster}  Grin

aigeezer
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1305


Cryptanalyst castrated by his government, 1952


View Profile
September 02, 2014, 01:32:42 PM
 #11

Publicity stunt, I assume. (But whose?)
LiteCoinGuy
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1148


In Satoshi I Trust


View Profile WWW
September 02, 2014, 03:14:37 PM
 #12

these girls are so stupid to store that kind of pics on their phones AND upload it in the cloud (even when that happens automatically)

Neg
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 224



View Profile
September 02, 2014, 04:42:22 PM
 #13

You would be stupid to ask payment in bitcoin.  Angry


No you wouldnt. You'd be stupid to use any other form of payment. Nobody will know who the money belongs to and where it went if you're smart enough with it.

these girls are so stupid to store that kind of pics on their phones AND upload it in the cloud (even when that happens automatically)

If they wernt aware that they were auto backed up it really wasnt their fault.
indiemax
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 720


View Profile
September 02, 2014, 06:50:20 PM
 #14

Publicity stunt, I assume. (But whose?)


well the film 'Sex tape' has just come out

http://www.imdb.com/title/tt1956620/

coincidence  Grin
Ludi
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 274


View Profile
September 03, 2014, 07:40:22 AM
 #15

Publicity stunt, I assume. (But whose?)


well the film 'Sex tape' has just come out

http://www.imdb.com/title/tt1956620/

coincidence  Grin

Maybe if Jennifer Lawrence was actually in it. ANd I don't see how this could be a publicity stunt for anything. Just hackers doing what hacker do. Suppose bitcoin will get some free press from it but not exactly the type we want.

aigeezer
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1305


Cryptanalyst castrated by his government, 1952


View Profile
September 03, 2014, 11:57:16 AM
 #16

Publicity stunt, I assume. (But whose?)


well the film 'Sex tape' has just come out

http://www.imdb.com/title/tt1956620/

coincidence  Grin

Maybe if Jennifer Lawrence was actually in it. ANd I don't see how this could be a publicity stunt for anything. Just hackers doing what hacker do. Suppose bitcoin will get some free press from it but not exactly the type we want.

Why would a bunch of starlets keep nude pix on their phones and/or in the cloud? Surely the only reason to put them there is so they can be "discovered" and "revealed" at some appropriate time in some appropriate way.

I'm intrigued that a flaky nude-starlet-pix story has legs (sorry) in this era of widespread (sorry) free porn. It seems very old-fashioned - Hollywood manufactured scandal, circa 1945 - but hey, if people fall for wardrobe malfunctions in the 21st century then why not give it a try. I'm even more intrigued that some media voices keep trying to turn it into a BTC story.

In today's news.... Woot!



Whitehouse
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 448


View Profile
September 03, 2014, 01:06:17 PM
 #17

Why would a bunch of starlets keep nude pix on their phones and/or in the cloud? Surely the only reason to put them there is so they can be "discovered" and "revealed" at some appropriate time in some appropriate way.

I'm intrigued that a flaky nude-starlet-pix story has legs (sorry) in this era of widespread (sorry) free porn. It seems very old-fashioned - Hollywood manufactured scandal, circa 1945 - but hey, if people fall for wardrobe malfunctions in the 21st century then why not give it a try. I'm even more intrigued that some media voices keep trying to turn it into a BTC story.

In today's news.... Woot!





Maybe because they didn't even know they were there. Mary Elizabeth Winstead seemed to be perplexed at how someone had gotten them seeing as she 'deleted' them a long time ago.

MUFC
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 502


View Profile
September 03, 2014, 01:09:49 PM
 #18

I'm intrigued that a flaky nude-starlet-pix story has legs (sorry) in this era of widespread (sorry) free porn. It seems very old-fashioned - Hollywood manufactured scandal, circa 1945 - but hey, if people fall for wardrobe malfunctions in the 21st century then why not give it a try. I'm even more intrigued that some media voices keep trying to turn it into a BTC story.

In today's news.... Woot!

I'm not really buying that. I very much doubt this is a manufactured scandal as Hollywood doesn't really have anything to gain here. And I also think you misunderstand the public's desire for celebrity tittle tattle. Just look how thirsty people are for any hint of salacious celb gossip or even a petty nipple slip. This is the jackpot of that. Sad really.

aigeezer
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1305


Cryptanalyst castrated by his government, 1952


View Profile
September 03, 2014, 04:19:50 PM
 #19

Hollywood doesn't really have anything to gain here.

Au contraire. Millions of people are now abuzz over those otherwise-unknown starlets. That's worth money to whoever produces their stuff. I'd never seen or heard of any of them before this story broke and I can almost remember some of their names now. Not only that but I'm wasting my own time joining the buzz over something I don't care about in the slightest rather than paying attention to things I do care about. Nice marketing win for somebody!  We are all very manipulable, especially when we think we are not.   Wink
LiteCoinGuy
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1148


In Satoshi I Trust


View Profile WWW
September 03, 2014, 04:35:48 PM
 #20

You would be stupid to ask payment in bitcoin.  Angry


No you wouldnt. You'd be stupid to use any other form of payment. Nobody will know who the money belongs to and where it went if you're smart enough with it.

these girls are so stupid to store that kind of pics on their phones AND upload it in the cloud (even when that happens automatically)

If they wernt aware that they were auto backed up it really wasnt their fault.


most of these women show their body all the time half naked and earn alot of money with it. i dont care about their feelings.

Pages: [1] 2 »  All
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Sponsored by , a Bitcoin-accepting VPN.
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!