Let's Count to 21 Million with Images

[Phinnaeus Gage]

[1714157010]

1714157010

[1714157010]

1714157010

[1714157010]

1714157010

[ZodiacDragon84]

[BrightAnarchist]

[Phinnaeus Gage]

[BrightAnarchist]

[beer4bitcoins]

http://www.wrenches.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/03/speed_limit_55.jpg

[BrightAnarchist]

[beer4bitcoins]

http://www.gourmetsteaks.com/wp-content/uploads/steak-sauce-heinz-57.jpg

[BrightAnarchist]

[GuinnessBIT]

Then I better get in early while BTC count is still low.

http://image.vetteweb.com/f/15304727+w750+st0/vemp_0608_05_z+classic_corvette_car_racing+59_side_corvette.jpg

[Phinnaeus Gage]

Since 21 million coins will take forever, how about we make things more interesting and allow someone to post a number only on the condition that they have that amount in Bitcoins in a verifiable wallet. (I.e. if you don't have 100 bitcoins, you can't post "100").

This modification should help this thread die much sooner.

Or we can pass this thread down to our children's children's children.

[Foxpup]

NOOOO!!! The post count doesn't match the numbers! You ruined everything!!!





There, that's better.

[Chinaski]

Cryptic (yeah I'm bored)

http://i40.tinypic.com/33vzomv.jpg

[Foxpup]

Cryptic (yeah I'm bored)

NO! I just did 62! Why can't you people learn how to count?





Please keep the numbers synchronised with the post count.

[Chinaski]

NO! I just did 62! Why can't you people learn how to count?
Please keep the numbers synchronised with the post count.

Sorry I only know how to count to potatoes :/
I'm synchronizing the post count btw, we are at n+2 now, which is terribly wrong, we have to be at n+1 if you want it to be synchro :]

[Chinaski]

http://i44.tinypic.com/14y7haw.jpg

Fix'd

[Foxpup]

NO! I just did 62! Why can't you people learn how to count?
Please keep the numbers synchronised with the post count.

Sorry I only know how to count to potatoes :/
I'm synchronizing the post count btw, we are at n+2 now, which is terribly wrong, we have to be at n+1 if you want it to be synchro :]

Learn to count higher. And we're counting from one; that is, the first post was number one, the first reply was number two, and so on. For reference, this post is number 67 (as you can see next to the "quote" button). But thanks to you, I have to also include numbers 65 and 66.

[Chinaski]

Learn to count higher. And we're counting from one; that is, the first post was number one, the first reply was number two, and so on. For reference, this post is number 67 (as you can see next to the "quote" button). But thanks to you, I have to also include numbers 65 and 66.

My bad my good sir, I was referring to the number of post shown on the main board...

http://i.ytimg.com/vi/BR7tF0kXiuo/0.jpg

[Foxpup]

[Foxpup]

Keep the numbers and the post count synchronised, please. I can't stress that enough. How else are we supposed to keep track of which number we're up to once we reach the millions?