Bitcoin Forum
May 10, 2024, 08:06:44 AM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 27.0 [Torrent]
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  
Pages: [1] 2 »  All
  Print  
Author Topic: How I found a flaw with zen-cloud payout system and more.  (Read 3482 times)
This is a self-moderated topic. If you do not want to be moderated by the person who started this topic, create a new topic.
philipma1957 (OP)
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 4116
Merit: 7864


'The right to privacy matters'


View Profile WWW
September 10, 2014, 12:57:10 PM
Last edit: September 10, 2014, 08:27:27 PM by philipma1957
 #1

New edit:
 I want to say that the bounty question was caused by my rush . Eric of zen mentioned to not post details here on bitcointalk. I had a miscommunication with him  and posted details my bad. Eric then said the would not pay the bounty.
  Frankly talking on pm's at 1:00 am
was my mistake I was tired and misunderstood Eric.  Posting so fast was a mistake on my part.  I got a lot of people going in lots of directions over this.  I know I pissed off Eric and he said no bounty.  To defend him it was late at night I dropped a bombshell on him and spam filters caused a lot of people a lot of grief.
  on the good side some real fixes are offered to this problem in the discussion on hashtalk.org so for now no nicehash but this idea below has promise

https://hashtalk.org/topic/5145/nicehash-sha256/737?page=39


since westhash/nicehash had rapid price flux someone proposed  a one month average I thought a diff jump length may be enough to fix it. cost of driving price up 10 or 11 days in a row would be more then enough and easier to detect.




Older edit:

 I am in contact with Gaw ceo and he asked me to say a few things.
I  am trying to be fair.  So here goes.
I stumbled on this problem. I tried to contact Eric and zen on zen hashtalk it was late last night and there was some miscommunication between the two of us. He asked me to not announce what I had found. I said okay He wanted emails explaining the flaw.  I sent multiple emails to him.  He kept saying I was not sending emails. I made a  statement that I did not believe him.  I posted what I found here.  In retrospect I suppose I could have waited longer to release the details.  I did not I released them.  My 1:00 am thinking may or may not have been the best thinking.

  Well the nicehash sha 256 mining option was ended on zen-gaw.  I have to say I have caused quite a few angry people. I wish that Eric's spam filters were not working as hard as they were in retrospect I would have waited to release this to see how they handled the issue.  I think I was mistaken and most likely Eric really did not have those emails.

 _______________________________________________________________________________ __

In defense of Eric and Josh of Zen and Gaw they closed the mining op for that pool they did the correct thing.

https://hashtalk.org/topic/5145/nicehash-sha256/3  They ended the nicehash -sha256 option
_______________________________________________________________________________ _______


I locked the first try at writing this thread  I decided I want to be able to moderate the thread.

I had 4 s-3's they mined at westhash and at nicehash. I sometimes would get huge spikes in price on Nicehash and westhash.  Often getting 2x normal payouts. I did not understand why but noted it as something I would look into. I did not understand why anyone would pay for sha256 hash at 2x the going rates.
I sold off my s-3's . I purchased 2 asicminer tubes.

 I was mining at mmpool.org with a pair of asic miner tubes. Why a small pool because asicminer tubes have pool choice limits if you use the stock controller (thanks fried cat).
So two days ago I thought I saw a flaw in mmpool.org's method of running the pool.  The pool is small around 50th.  I decided to test my idea out.  It involved buying large hash from westhash (a nicehash partner)  I purchased blocks of 30 th or 50 th even  100 th on and off from westhash and pointed them at mmpool.org  sometimes the mmpool.org got up to 130th of which 80th was all mine.
   After 30 hours of testing I spent about .75btc doing the tests I decided my idea that mmpool.org was flawed was wrong.  I did raise my btc due if it ever hits a block and would kind of break even if the block is hit soon.  The result I was looking for did not happen.  Sometimes an experiment can give a different result then you were looking for.
 I drove the price up from about .0245btc to .0307 btc on both westhash and its partner nicehash.  After I stopped the btc spending price dropped down to about .025btc




I realized this has other results.  I own an s-3  hosted on zen-cloud   and point it at nicehash.
here are scheduled payoffs for all zen gear pointed at nicehash


Payoff are .0307 per th.      now for 1 zen cloud s-3  this means you get .0145 instead of .0095   a gain of about .0050btc so no one would spend .7500 btc to gain .0050 btc.  But If I had pointed the extra hash at cex.io/ghash   my .75btc would have paid back around .5btc  so I would be spending around .2500 btc to earn .0050  now we all know  that makes no sense at all spending 50x the btc units to get 1 btc units for the 1 s-3 is silly a waste of money.

But zen cloud is full of gh in the sky.
the top ten are more then 100th total



 Those people would be paid  100 x .0307 = 3.07 btc  instead of standard 1.9 btc - 2.1 btc    so that is around 1 btc extra on just the top ten sha256 miners.  This could have cost zen-gaw big bucks. I like or should I say liked this company or maybe I should say I have had a hot and cold relationship with the company.  They have been very nice to me and at time really fucking stupid.
I am basically an honest guy so I decide to post a thread to them.  I fear they have been robbed more then once by manipulation on nicehash by someone buying on westhash.  I have seen huge over paid sha256 hash and could not understand why people would overpay for  sha 256 hash.  This reason is really good reason.  

So I do the right thing. I posted this thread.




I have more to say but I am going for a swim.  Be back in a few hours.

▄▄███████▄▄
▄██████████████▄
▄██████████████████▄
▄████▀▀▀▀███▀▀▀▀█████▄
▄█████████████▄█▀████▄
███████████▄███████████
██████████▄█▀███████████
██████████▀████████████
▀█████▄█▀█████████████▀
▀████▄▄▄▄███▄▄▄▄████▀
▀██████████████████▀
▀███████████████▀
▀▀███████▀▀
.
 MΞTAWIN  THE FIRST WEB3 CASINO   
.
.. PLAY NOW ..
1715328404
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1715328404

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1715328404
Reply with quote  #2

1715328404
Report to moderator
1715328404
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1715328404

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1715328404
Reply with quote  #2

1715328404
Report to moderator
If you see garbage posts (off-topic, trolling, spam, no point, etc.), use the "report to moderator" links. All reports are investigated, though you will rarely be contacted about your reports.
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction.
1715328404
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1715328404

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1715328404
Reply with quote  #2

1715328404
Report to moderator
1715328404
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1715328404

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1715328404
Reply with quote  #2

1715328404
Report to moderator
IanFoxley
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 910
Merit: 1000


View Profile
September 10, 2014, 02:34:37 PM
 #2

Looks like someone listened to your advice perhaps.

Nicehash has been removed from the list of pools at Zencloud now for those mining SHA256

I had this message pop up on my zen cloud dashboard.

Removing Nicehash SHA256

ZenClouders,

Due to an issue that may affect the stability and reliability of our service, we have adjusted our available pools for SHA256 in order to protect the investments of our customers.

Anyone currently mining on Nicehash SHA256 will soon be automatically switched over to BTC Guild.

Thanks for your understanding and continued support.

suchmoon
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 3654
Merit: 8922


https://bpip.org


View Profile WWW
September 10, 2014, 02:38:23 PM
 #3

There is a rapidly growing discussion over at HT:

https://hashtalk.org/topic/5142/what-is-this-crap-about-removing-nicehash-sha256-from-zencloud
IanFoxley
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 910
Merit: 1000


View Profile
September 10, 2014, 02:45:27 PM
 #4


I am not surprised to be honest, will be a lot of unhappy people.


tom99
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 420
Merit: 250


View Profile
September 10, 2014, 02:48:07 PM
 #5

I locked the first try at writing this thread  I decided I want to be able to moderate the thread.

I had 4 s-3's they mined at westhash and at nicehash. I sometimes would get huge spikes in price on Nicehash and westhash.  Often getting 2x normal payouts. I did not understand why but noted it as something I would look into. I did not understand why anyone would pay for sha256 hash at 2x the going rates.
I sold off my s-3's . I purchased 2 asicminer tubes.

 I was mining at mmpool.org with a pair of asic miner tubes. Why a small pool because asicminer tubes have pool choice limits if you use the stock controller (thanks fried cat).
So two days ago I thought I saw a flaw in mmpool.org's method of running the pool.  The pool is small around 50th.  I decided to test my idea out.  It involved buying large hash from westhash (a nicehash partner)  I purchased blocks of 30 th or 50 th even  100 th on and off from westhash and pointed them at mmpool.org  sometimes the mmpool.org got up to 130th of which 80th was all mine.
   After 30 hours of testing I spent about .75btc doing the tests I decided my idea that mmpool.org was flawed was wrong.  I did raise my btc due if it ever hits a block and would kind of break even if the block is hit soon.  The result I was looking for did not happen.  Sometimes an experiment can give a different result then you were looking for.
 I drove the price up from about .0245btc to .0307 btc on both westhash and its partner nicehash.  After I stopped the btc spending price dropped down to about .025btc




I realized this has other results.  I own an s-3  hosted on zen-cloud   and point it at nicehash.
here are scheduled payoffs for all zen gear pointed at nicehash


Payoff are .0307 per th.      now for 1 zen cloud s-3  this means you get .0145 instead of .0095   a gain of about .0050btc so no one would spend .7500 btc to gain .0050 btc.  But If I had pointed the extra hash at cex.io/ghash   my .75btc would have paid back around .5btc  so I would be spending around .2500 btc to earn .0050  now we all know  that makes no sense at all spending 50x the btc units to get 1 btc units for the 1 s-3 is silly a waste of money.

But zen cloud is full of gh in the sky.
the top ten are more then 100th total


 Those people would be paid  100 x .0307 = 3.07 btc  instead of standard 1.9 btc - 2.1 btc    so that is around 1 btc extra on just the top ten sha256 miners.  This could have cost zen-gaw big bucks. I like or should I say liked this company or maybe I should say I have had a hot and cold relationship with the company.  They have been very nice to me and at time really fucking stupid.
I am basically an honest guy so I decide to post a thread to them.  I fear they have been robbed more then once by manipulation on nicehash by someone buying on westhash.  I have seen huge over paid sha256 hash and could not understand why people would overpay for  sha 256 hash.  This reason is really good reason.  

So I do the right thing. I posted this thread.



I have more to say but I am going for a swim.  Be back in a few hours.

  I think GAW should thank you for bug and save them big BTC also this Friday Prime switch to SHA256 that big hash if no one catch it but you piss off miners.
IanFoxley
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 910
Merit: 1000


View Profile
September 10, 2014, 03:15:43 PM
 #6


That link goes nowhere now.

verloren
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 323
Merit: 250


View Profile
September 10, 2014, 03:16:59 PM
 #7

https://hashtalk.org/topic/5145/nicehash-sha256/

Merged topic.
tom99
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 420
Merit: 250


View Profile
September 10, 2014, 03:46:19 PM
Last edit: September 10, 2014, 04:36:37 PM by tom99
 #8

Nice and West down for maint.

ps: both of them back up now.
philipma1957 (OP)
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 4116
Merit: 7864


'The right to privacy matters'


View Profile WWW
September 10, 2014, 04:37:14 PM
Last edit: September 10, 2014, 08:26:11 PM by philipma1957
 #9

yeah I rather an attempt at honesty then all of us cutting throats over coins.



I went for my swim and further developed  how cheap it was to do this. the case example below is made up but very easy for anyone to do.
_______________________________________________________________________________ _____

Lets say I am Lee from china and run this thread. I am not him  and he did not do this.

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=514758.0

Zen-Gaw is a rival to me.  I have tons of hashpower in my data centers and Zen-Gaw  drains customers from me.
How can I fight back?

So In lee's mind he says I have 66 1.5th  not sold or hosted that is 100th.  I have them pointed at ghash and I get normal luck so my 100th is getting 1.9 btc before the power bill.

He points the 100th at nicehash ands sells his hash at 0.0310  way too high.

He has a friend open an account at westhash buying 100th at 0.0311  also way too high.

so 100 x 0.0310 = 3.10btc  so 100 x 0.0311 = 3.11btc   he is getting  to jump the going price from 0.019 to 0.030
for .001 btc and  a 2 percent fee which is .02 x 3.1 or 0.062  and .02 x 3.11 which is 0.0622 that means .
0.0622
0.0620
0.001
_________
0.1252   btc spent

  to rise  the payout from say .010 an s-3 to .015 and s-3 and all other gear following nicehash sha256

It is legal to do this and in the end Lee would still have his 100th earning the 1.9 btc - .1252 and his bottom line would be only  60 usd worse off...  each day he did it.
__________________________________________________________________________

Zen-gaw would lose 4 to 10 btc for each 1 day attack.   just guessing but I think I am correct. Since the loss for just the top ten champions was about 1 btc yesterday.

I have been thanked via pm from  GAW Miners_Ceo

he promised me a btc bounty.  So I spent .75btc to find the problem  I guess he will send me 1.75btc

that would be a btc bounty plus the .75btc in expenses

 I will post on that when he  sends it.

I am taking Off for some pizza at the jersey shore.  be back later.

At collider. I deleted your post but I have saved a copy of it.

to all please read  top of thread

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=777194.0

▄▄███████▄▄
▄██████████████▄
▄██████████████████▄
▄████▀▀▀▀███▀▀▀▀█████▄
▄█████████████▄█▀████▄
███████████▄███████████
██████████▄█▀███████████
██████████▀████████████
▀█████▄█▀█████████████▀
▀████▄▄▄▄███▄▄▄▄████▀
▀██████████████████▀
▀███████████████▀
▀▀███████▀▀
.
 MΞTAWIN  THE FIRST WEB3 CASINO   
.
.. PLAY NOW ..
SDRebel
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 569
Merit: 507


View Profile
September 10, 2014, 09:27:50 PM
 #10

thanks OP for posting the whole thing
SDRebel
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 569
Merit: 507


View Profile
September 10, 2014, 09:29:48 PM
 #11

keeps timing out for me, seems it's overloaded
SDRebel
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 569
Merit: 507


View Profile
September 10, 2014, 09:36:51 PM
 #12

now the problem at hand is the following:
if nicehash was paying well over BTCGuild and Josh now admmited that they didn't point their hashes to nicehash because it would destroy the market (because of surplus) then where all/were all the hashest going to? even if all hashes were in btcguild, the delta between nice and btcguild had to come from somewhere.
this is the reason why we need transparency
SDRebel
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 569
Merit: 507


View Profile
September 10, 2014, 09:43:01 PM
 #13

yeah I rather an attempt at honesty then all of us cutting throats over coins.



Phil,thanks again for all the info. I honestly appreciate it. One thing I brought up over there is that I do not believe you handled this appropriately
let me quote myself
"in that sense I disagree with him (Phil). I don't think GAW ever offered a bounty, so he has no right to demand one. I honestly believe that. If GAW then decided to give him a bounty, fine, but he has no right to demand a bounty. What he did in fact was borderline blackmail and I do not condone such behavior. let me post that over there as well"
However, I do understand you regret some of what you did and you confessed that it was late, were upset, etc

I commend people that look for the truth and I also believe GAW should take another step forward towards transparency
bitgeek
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 462
Merit: 251



View Profile
September 10, 2014, 09:49:46 PM
 #14



I am not surprised to be honest, will be a lot of unhappy people.


No wonder you aren't surprised, mistakes are what competition always awaits.


███████████████████████████████
███████████████████████████████
████████████████████████████████
████████████████████████████████
██████████████████████████████████
██████████████████████████████████████████
█████████████████████████████████████████
███████████████████████████████████████
█████████████████████████████████████
█████████████████████████████████████
█████████████████████████████████████
███████████████████████████████████
█████████████████████████████████████
█████████████████████████████████████

.

.

.

Online.BTC.Bingo

.

.

.*500%.CASH.BACK.+.INSTANT.BONUS
..PROGRESSIVE.JACKPOT
..NO-DOWNLOAD.CLIENT
.

.

.

EPIC.FUN.
philipma1957 (OP)
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 4116
Merit: 7864


'The right to privacy matters'


View Profile WWW
September 10, 2014, 11:44:58 PM
 #15

yeah I rather an attempt at honesty then all of us cutting throats over coins.



Phil,thanks again for all the info. I honestly appreciate it. One thing I brought up over there is that I do not believe you handled this appropriately
let me quote myself
"in that sense I disagree with him (Phil). I don't think GAW ever offered a bounty, so he has no right to demand one. I honestly believe that. If GAW then decided to give him a bounty, fine, but he has no right to demand a bounty. What he did in fact was borderline blackmail and I do not condone such behavior. let me post that over there as well"
However, I do understand you regret some of what you did and you confessed that it was late, were upset, etc

I commend people that look for the truth and I also believe GAW should take another step forward towards transparency


Ah I found it in the middle of last night  and this were complicated by too much coffee pm's email's yada yada yada



I just posted this. here https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=720844.msg8768366#msg8768366

"Okay Josh the  ceo   of zen-gaw and I had a long talk via pm.  He paid me 1.75btc .

0.75btc   was to repay the money I spent to figure the nicehash issue out.

1.0btc was a finders fee  for saving his company a possible huge financial  setback  if this was done after the large fri sha256 was done.

 I wish I had been able to explain this easier and simpler and not caused the drama that has occurred.

  But plain and simple  If I had figured out Mt Gox 1 week sooner and saved that day I would have.
If I figured out BIPs in advance and saved 1000 lost coins I would have.
 If I had been able to do this for trade fortress I would have.

I also think in each case I would have pissed off a lot of people.  No matter how I had done it.  


I know that I pissed off people here that  was not my intent.  I still have an S-3 mining in the zen cloud and it will earn less.  I want to point out they stopped the problem and knowing them they will come up with a better idea.
   I still feel like I walked up to them and said your left nut is bad it has to go.  Or if you arer\ a girl your left ovary is bad time to cut it out. the pain today is real but in the long run you will survive.
   To their credit they did give me a bounty and did not fluff off the problem.  If they were MT Gox they would have run.

Josh thank you for being a stand up guy. Plus a man of your word."



THIS IS NOT SOMETHING I WAS LOOKING FOR .

In retrospect I was a bit afraid that I found something this big.

  I got a bit paranoid  and I rushed it to print so to speak.  
Don't drink coffee and sit at  a pc for 20 hours out of 24 .  If you find something important you may handle it stupidly.
If I ever find a large problem like this again.  
I will handle it differently.

I do believe I stopped a lot of money from being stolen from zen-gaw which ultimately helps their customers.




▄▄███████▄▄
▄██████████████▄
▄██████████████████▄
▄████▀▀▀▀███▀▀▀▀█████▄
▄█████████████▄█▀████▄
███████████▄███████████
██████████▄█▀███████████
██████████▀████████████
▀█████▄█▀█████████████▀
▀████▄▄▄▄███▄▄▄▄████▀
▀██████████████████▀
▀███████████████▀
▀▀███████▀▀
.
 MΞTAWIN  THE FIRST WEB3 CASINO   
.
.. PLAY NOW ..
SDRebel
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 569
Merit: 507


View Profile
September 11, 2014, 12:32:59 AM
 #16

yeah I rather an attempt at honesty then all of us cutting throats over coins.



Phil,thanks again for all the info. I honestly appreciate it. One thing I brought up over there is that I do not believe you handled this appropriately
let me quote myself
"in that sense I disagree with him (Phil). I don't think GAW ever offered a bounty, so he has no right to demand one. I honestly believe that. If GAW then decided to give him a bounty, fine, but he has no right to demand a bounty. What he did in fact was borderline blackmail and I do not condone such behavior. let me post that over there as well"
However, I do understand you regret some of what you did and you confessed that it was late, were upset, etc

I commend people that look for the truth and I also believe GAW should take another step forward towards transparency


Ah I found it in the middle of last night  and this were complicated by too much coffee pm's email's yada yada yada



I just posted this. here https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=720844.msg8768366#msg8768366

"Okay Josh the  ceo   of zen-gaw and I had a long talk via pm.  He paid me 1.75btc .

0.75btc   was to repay the money I spent to figure the nicehash issue out.

1.0btc was a finders fee  for saving his company a possible huge financial  setback  if this was done after the large fri sha256 was done.

 I wish I had been able to explain this easier and simpler and not caused the drama that has occurred.

  But plain and simple  If I had figured out Mt Gox 1 week sooner and saved that day I would have.
If I figured out BIPs in advance and saved 1000 lost coins I would have.
 If I had been able to do this for trade fortress I would have.

I also think in each case I would have pissed off a lot of people.  No matter how I had done it.  


I know that I pissed off people here that  was not my intent.  I still have an S-3 mining in the zen cloud and it will earn less.  I want to point out they stopped the problem and knowing them they will come up with a better idea.
   I still feel like I walked up to them and said your left nut is bad it has to go.  Or if you arer\ a girl your left ovary is bad time to cut it out. the pain today is real but in the long run you will survive.
   To their credit they did give me a bounty and did not fluff off the problem.  If they were MT Gox they would have run.

Josh thank you for being a stand up guy. Plus a man of your word."



THIS IS NOT SOMETHING I WAS LOOKING FOR .

In retrospect I was a bit afraid that I found something this big.

  I got a bit paranoid  and I rushed it to print so to speak.  
Don't drink coffee and sit at  a pc for 20 hours out of 24 .  If you find something important you may handle it stupidly.
If I ever find a large problem like this again.  
I will handle it differently.

I do believe I stopped a lot of money from being stolen from zen-gaw which ultimately helps their customers.





Ok, things are more clear now, sorry i didnt come back earlier, it was bath time for the kids...
Glad things worked out, but now you are the villain in front of 90% percent of gaw customers. For the other 10% like me, we really appreciate every bit of info, as we are looking for both good and bad info, as long as it is true.
But like i said, more than a flaw, you uncovered something important in GAW`s strategy
philipma1957 (OP)
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 4116
Merit: 7864


'The right to privacy matters'


View Profile WWW
September 11, 2014, 12:45:02 AM
 #17



Ok, things are more clear now, sorry i didnt come back earlier, it was bath time for the kids...
Glad things worked out, but now you are the villain in front of 90% percent of gaw customers. For the other 10% like me, we really appreciate every bit of info, as we are looking for both good and bad info, as long as it is true.
But like i said, more than a flaw, you uncovered something important in GAW`s strategy

  Ah shit happens I read hundreds of comments on hashtalk.  I knew when I found this it was a big deal.
So many people mining had no idea how they were making the system work. by the way it still works  with every pool but nicehash.  I do believe there are workarounds for nicehash to be brought back. but it will not be as seesaw in payoffs.  they may adjust payments over a 5 or 10 day time period not 1 day. 

 I knew if I kept my mouth shut it would have been wrong  many people  could lose money that they could not afford to lose. 

▄▄███████▄▄
▄██████████████▄
▄██████████████████▄
▄████▀▀▀▀███▀▀▀▀█████▄
▄█████████████▄█▀████▄
███████████▄███████████
██████████▄█▀███████████
██████████▀████████████
▀█████▄█▀█████████████▀
▀████▄▄▄▄███▄▄▄▄████▀
▀██████████████████▀
▀███████████████▀
▀▀███████▀▀
.
 MΞTAWIN  THE FIRST WEB3 CASINO   
.
.. PLAY NOW ..
SDRebel
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 569
Merit: 507


View Profile
September 11, 2014, 05:16:26 PM
 #18

Surpised this didnt get more attention
philipma1957 (OP)
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 4116
Merit: 7864


'The right to privacy matters'


View Profile WWW
September 12, 2014, 01:46:24 AM
Last edit: September 12, 2014, 02:00:36 AM by philipma1957
 #19

Surpised this didnt get more attention

Yeah it is like  more then 100,000 10 gh hashlets  sold , plus  a 1,000,000 order was placed for s-3's  from bitmaintech.  that would be 2000 of them.

plus a lot of nicehash hashlets sold.     So it was a lot of money at stake.   Biggest thing I ever found out first.  or at least reported it first as some very large payouts were inflected  on nicehash over the last 60 days. Others may have figured it out and that is why prices popped so high every once in a while.

I figure it affected 2 million usd in their  products or  maybe a  lot more.  


 Not that 2 million usd was overpaid.  but that 2 million worth of miners needed to moved off the nicehash pools.

It was not a fun thing for me  to tell someone to alter 2 million plus usd  of their product.


That 2 million is an educated guess.  Based on something I read about bitmaintech purchased by zen-gaw on the fourm and based on the champ listings. Of sha256 and hashlets gh.  If anything it is low not high. 

  The product still has plenty of value. It is just altered a bit.  certainly to a much safer place in the hashing world.

▄▄███████▄▄
▄██████████████▄
▄██████████████████▄
▄████▀▀▀▀███▀▀▀▀█████▄
▄█████████████▄█▀████▄
███████████▄███████████
██████████▄█▀███████████
██████████▀████████████
▀█████▄█▀█████████████▀
▀████▄▄▄▄███▄▄▄▄████▀
▀██████████████████▀
▀███████████████▀
▀▀███████▀▀
.
 MΞTAWIN  THE FIRST WEB3 CASINO   
.
.. PLAY NOW ..
unibean
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 36
Merit: 0


View Profile
September 12, 2014, 02:39:01 AM
 #20

I applaud your efforts in finding this flaw with zen-cloud and hashlet pool payouts.
Pages: [1] 2 »  All
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!