Bitcoin Forum
May 04, 2024, 06:32:51 AM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 27.0 [Torrent]
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  
Pages: [1] 2 »  All
  Print  
Author Topic: Re: About the MidasCoin locked thread & New Thread  (Read 4042 times)
BTCspoon (OP)
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 238
Merit: 100


View Profile
September 11, 2014, 09:37:21 AM
Last edit: September 17, 2014, 11:05:18 PM by BTCspoon
 #1

Quote from: Midascoin

Our triumph but also our biggest mistake

Making pre-made coin projects with day1 listings appear for what they are; penny stock selling and pure pump/dump schemes.
 
Network Attack - Critical info and notes

Offending chain has been inflated into the midascoin network.
The offending chain is a copy of the official chain until block 793.
Since block 793 to 1175 the offending chain is a blank chain, that still carries our coinbase (they were not able to bypass this) but didn't carry any transactions (made by the pool, or anyone else)

The offending chain has been pushed as the best chain not because of a greater hash power (that our PoM distribution system is able to detect and fight back); instead has been pushed with a crossfire of DDOS against the official nodes + inflating an enormous number of peers in the network, carrying the offending chain. This made it possible for the offending chain to be recognized as the best chain even with much less hashpower than the official chains Hashing power.
(check difficulty during the takeover
http://cryptotrends.info/MID?param=d0713b07072c3afef652e34715e19097cdf4897770c3da1e4bf9fe2ba9569171 )

The takeover of the “best chain” took place during the official chain block 979 and caused the the nodes to switch suddenly from block 979 to 1175.

The takeover didn't generate any reward for the offenders, cause of our coinbase checkpoint, but voided every transaction since block 793.

We assume 2 possible reasons behind this:

1- Inflate and instamine 196 blocks in the pool to suddenly mine a monster amount of MidasCoin.

2- No direct profit, just for the midascoin network service disruption.

In case of option 1, what they didn't know was that our daemon is linked up to insert the new blocks on the pool database using a custom blocknotify script, that is made to recognize “unnatural behavior”, stop itself from inserting blocks and and kill the daemon, to avoid any possible problems that could happen.

In case of option 2, you think you were able to damage and weaken MidasCoin? Think again, we will come back with a challenge.


#midascoin and the trolls, episode 4.

Even if the attack has has grabbed the attention of everyone today, #midascoin is for trolls what honey is for the bears.

Yesterday, someone with 10 “coordinated” people infamously trashed the forums for hours (just before the coordinated network attack).

While we value every opinion and critique, yesterday every reasonable boundary has been crossed.

People impersonated the company brand, infringed every possible ethical law and even threatened our health (like if they are in a position to do this).
Do you think that this will serve any purpose?

You think we’re done? #MidasCoin will keep exposing how scammers are trying to destroy a coin that threatens their scam efforts.

#MidasCoin will keep making your pre-made coin projects with day1 listings for what they are; penny stock selling and pure pump/dump schemes. We'll do this by bringing something real to the table, and continuing to bring it.

We also are not perfect (yet).

Thanks to feedback and reviews of some community members (Stoner19 in primis) we investigated the “slow block generation” issue, causing a longer block time than 2.5 minutes.

Those members expressed their opinion in a civil manner and their requests have been accomplished: We found a conflict between the hashrate variations of PoM distribution and the coin network difficulty algo DigiShield.

Digishield is a very powerful difficulty algo for helping provide multipool protection, but it retargets the difficulty UP so quickly, without giving enough room for the PoM parameters to do their job and ensure the proper block target time.

Results of the investigation are as follows: During 48 hours the average effective block target was 2.94 minutes instead of the expected target 2.5 minutes.

This will be patched during this pause time, to ensure an average block generation time as close as possible to the expected target of 2.5 minutes.


And now, what's next?

We can't fight the FUD, while fighting network attacks, while improving our service and all of this while providing a payment network and a guaranteed support to the people who support us and our project.

We decided, after a discussion with the early adopters, #MidasCoin services will be paused until a full patch is released to fixed the issues outlined in the previous section.

We will deal with all the aspects one by one until they are fixed.

We will go up against the FUD, by getting proof of equity and additional verification but also organizing a proper department for taking care of bitcointalk community management.

Against the network offenders, analyzing the attack and adding fail-proof checkpoints to avoid any other possible service disruptions in the future.

We will improve our own "mistakes", integrating the PoM system better with the difficulty retargeting algo, to obtain the average expected block target time.


And what happens to the funds?

About this matter we consulted for long with active community members and early adopters, and we come with the best possible solutions for the current #midascoin situation.

Since the network is still very young, and there are no third party exchanges yet, the transactions sent user to user are supposed to be very limited (near to 0).

We decided that the pool database, in this situation, will be the KING to getting us back on track.
We will reopen with a blank chain, with the actual number of blocks (1175),  without any transactions on it.  All the transactions made by pool will be reverted into available balance (including referral earnings) and available for withdraw at the reopening of all services.

But that's not all. Since the pool stopped to account blocks (block number 979) people kept mining for several hours, even after our public announcement, creating a monster unaccounted round of 7.553.459.836 shares.


Those people invested their hashing power to mine MidasCoin, and so we will reward them with all the blocks pushed by the offending chain. This Uber round will be accounted with a payout of
(1175-979)*50 MID that mean 196 blocks * 50 MID = 9800 MidasCoin, + a total of 200 Midas from our pocket, rounding up the super round amount payout, to 10000 MidasCoin.

We are gonna close the stratum(s) soon, so everyone needs to stop mining as soon as possible. Then all the contributor in the super-round shares will be paid proportionally with the 10000 MID payout.

MidasCoin will start at block 1175 at the reopening, with a blank chain (only coinbase) and all the user funds reverted into the pool balance.

ETA is 4-5 days.


And now some numbers of #midascoin.

- 2093 members registered on Midaspool.com
http://screencast.com/t/We9auuSxWiC

- 300 new registrations everyday (since the pre-announce)

- Peak Hashrate of 31 Ghash/ - Average Hashrate 12+ Ghash.

- Hosted Merchant platform at 0 fee - Accept payment without hosting daemon (paypal style)

- Integrated financial Platform with ATM Debit Card and VCC (virtual credit card)

- Top management team: http://midaspay.io/the-golden-squad/

- Unique distribution system PoM. Unnecessary hashpower increase currency value

- Backed by gold reserve.

- Guaranteed increasing value

- Guaranteed community support helpdesk: 8 hours for low priority - 2 hours for Urgent.

- No Premine. No IPO. No dump on exchanges.

- No exchange on day 1

- 236 MidasCoin already paid through the Referral system.


Websites of the network:

Midaspay.io
Midascoin.io
MidasPool.com
api.midaspay.io
merchant.midaspay.io
support.midaspay.io
support.midascoin.io

Legal terms:

Company information
Terms Of Services
Privacy Policy

#MidasCoin is here to stay for a long time, and is not going anywhere!

Support helpdesk still remains active:

http://midaspay.io/helpdesk
via email: support@midaspay.io
Twitter @Midaspay and #IRC #midascoin on freenodee (accessible using webchat at this link http://midaspool.com/index.php?page=about&action=chat)


P.S.
Every transaction made since up this point, will not be considered for the reopening.  Only the pool database will be considered.

Mandatary wallet upgrade on reopening.

Again you try to discharge your own failure on others. 10 "hired" peoples? (which you changed/edited for a more cautious word "coordinated")...Are only peoples, not hired or coordinated at all, but with the same legitimate concerns and point of view. Concerns you avoided all day long, even threaten two of the forum members.

Same goes for your imaginary coordinated attack. Miners were on a chain, but after your demonstration, they all left, and the only mining rigs staying was yours, you just forked your own coin alone ("Like a boss").

You said, you can't fight the FUD, i agree with you, imaginary FUD can't be fought.

Now you locked up your thread, for evident reason...and let no chance to anyone to answer publicly, i opened this one to correct that.


Locked up thread link: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=760755.840

1714804371
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1714804371

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1714804371
Reply with quote  #2

1714804371
Report to moderator
1714804371
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1714804371

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1714804371
Reply with quote  #2

1714804371
Report to moderator
1714804371
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1714804371

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1714804371
Reply with quote  #2

1714804371
Report to moderator
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction.
1714804371
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1714804371

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1714804371
Reply with quote  #2

1714804371
Report to moderator
1714804371
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1714804371

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1714804371
Reply with quote  #2

1714804371
Report to moderator
1714804371
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1714804371

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1714804371
Reply with quote  #2

1714804371
Report to moderator
ocminer
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2660
Merit: 1240



View Profile WWW
September 11, 2014, 09:48:30 AM
 #2

This happens when some people without technical knowledge try to start something they can't handle..

Guys, this whole Crypto thing is about DEcentralization.. Not Centralized Pools, centralized coins, centralized exchanges.

Get as many pools in as you can, get as many nodes/peers in as you can and get as many exchanges in you can.. This way you secure the network.

And there was no coordianted "attack" .. lol.. you could easily "attack" the chain with nicehash if you rent all the scrypt power.... You should have
at least chosen a new algo like M7, X15 or so which is NOT "attackable" by lots of hashpower.. Oh.. And checkpoints also help (autmatic checkpointing too Smiley)

suprnova pools - reliable mining pools - #suprnova on freenet
https://www.suprnova.cc - FOLLOW us @ Twitter ! twitter.com/SuprnovaPools
BTCspoon (OP)
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 238
Merit: 100


View Profile
September 11, 2014, 10:01:56 AM
 #3

This happens when some people without technical knowledge try to start something they can't handle..

Guys, this whole Crypto thing is about DEcentralization.. Not Centralized Pools, centralized coins, centralized exchanges.

Get as many pools in as you can, get as many nodes/peers in as you can and get as many exchanges in you can.. This way you secure the network.

And there was no coordianted "attack" .. lol.. you could easily "attack" the chain with nicehash if you rent all the scrypt power.... You should have
at least chosen a new algo like M7, X15 or so which is NOT "attackable" by lots of hashpower.. Oh.. And checkpoints also help (automatic checkpointing too Smiley)

Exactly.
JCNC
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 177
Merit: 100



View Profile
September 11, 2014, 01:24:51 PM
 #4

This happens when some people without technical knowledge try to start something they can't handle..

Guys, this whole Crypto thing is about DEcentralization.. Not Centralized Pools, centralized coins, centralized exchanges.

Get as many pools in as you can, get as many nodes/peers in as you can and get as many exchanges in you can.. This way you secure the network.

And there was no coordianted "attack" .. lol.. you could easily "attack" the chain with nicehash if you rent all the scrypt power.... You should have
at least chosen a new algo like M7, X15 or so which is NOT "attackable" by lots of hashpower.. Oh.. And checkpoints also help (autmatic checkpointing too Smiley)

Yeah this ^

I was definitely enjoying all the drama in the thread though! Keep going guys, it's fun  Wink
earlz
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 439
Merit: 250


mmmmmm


View Profile WWW
September 11, 2014, 01:51:11 PM
 #5

Quote
The offending chain has been pushed as the best chain not because of a greater hash power (that our PoM distribution system is able to detect and fight back); instead has been pushed with a crossfire of DDOS against the official nodes + inflating an enormous number of peers in the network, carrying the offending chain. This made it possible for the offending chain to be recognized as the best chain even with much less hashpower than the official chains Hashing power.
(check difficulty during the takeover

This is absolute bullshit. The best chain is the one with the most cumulative PoW difficulty. It has nothing to do with it being widely distributed.

The problem is Proof Of Mine. Although a 51% attack yields no rewards, it enables double spends and orphaning tons of transactions, easily. The Midas Pool had about 10GHash/s when I looked at it last. However, they only dedicated about 50Mhash/s to securing the network. This means, to do a 51% attack, you only need to rent 50MHash, which is easily available for about $5 on a rental site.

I've been telling them it's a flawed concept since they first made the pre-announcement, and they've constantly blown me off as being incorrect.

Btw, I was planning to conduct a double spend tonight, complete with a video of me doing it, but now that this happened I don't think I have to. It wasn't me that attacked this chain, though I really wanted to Smiley

Check out my full list of Coin Reviews
Currently working on the Qtum Project
My Skype account earlzdotnet has been compromised. Please report to me any usage seen from it, or from the email earlz@earlz.biz.tm
mem_co
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 83
Merit: 10


View Profile
September 11, 2014, 02:48:34 PM
 #6

If dev is closing main thread it smells. I hope they won't scam others in near future.
BTCspoon (OP)
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 238
Merit: 100


View Profile
September 16, 2014, 02:24:50 PM
Last edit: September 17, 2014, 11:06:33 PM by BTCspoon
 #7

If dev is closing main thread it smells. I hope they won't scam others in near future.

Sound like they are still trying to. They reopened another thread heavily self moderated where unwanted messages are deleted...(a way to get ride of every comment on the old thread). Feel free to post here, if you need to, nothing will be deleted.

Cheers.

To all investors, miners, read that thread carefully before investing your time and money on Midascoin: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=760755.840
BTCspoon (OP)
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 238
Merit: 100


View Profile
September 16, 2014, 02:36:58 PM
Last edit: September 16, 2014, 03:33:01 PM by BTCspoon
 #8

How funny is that, just got that in my PM after replying to the user podizzle:

Moderated by Midascoin here https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=784286.20 :
Quote
Quote from: Bitcoin Forum
A reply of yours, quoted below, was deleted by the starter of a self-moderated topic. There are no rules of self-moderation, so this deletion cannot be appealed. Do not continue posting in this topic if the topic-starter has requested that you leave.

You can create a new topic if you are unsatisfied with this one.

Quote
my postts containing important information that investors should know are being deleted. i'd give the information again but it would just be deleted.

as a snr member you would think i would get a little FUCKING RESPECT

Feel free to post your informations here: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=778327.msg8844904#msg8844904

Cheers.
Multicoin
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 33
Merit: 0


View Profile WWW
September 16, 2014, 03:09:00 PM
 #9

It should be noted that I have failed to receive the 10 BTC bounty placed on 'Prove that block generation is centralized.' To which my answer is here: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=760755.msg8753420#msg8753420

Midas keeps disagreeing with me, and has nothing to say on WHY I'm wrong. So he has to call in the developer, who of course will say that it isn't centralized.
I was given a timeline of 24 hours once I made the support ticket for the bounty, and it has been pushed back and back and back... Now it's at 96 hours that I should expect a conversation with the actual dev about this.

Midas does not know how a coin works and keep saying that it wasn't a 51% attack.

Again, he doesn't know what he is talking about:
"All BlockChains of MidasCoin used during development will be destroyed, with a fresh genesis block created for the release."
of which the whole 'accounting' stuff means nothing and https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=784286.msg8845038#msg8845038 is just outright.

Another outright lie is this gem from the IRC channel:
Quote
<9.14.14><09.53.06.am> <@MidasCoin>  *We already received contacts by 6 different exchanges, asking to list us, and without contactin em first.  The comparison with coin that never reach exchange for lack of interests doesn't fit very will on this situation Wink
<9.14.14><10.05.35.am> <@MidasCoin>  *very well
<9.14.14><10.25.02.am> <Mutsumi>  A lot of exchanged don't list in the first few days, let alone contact a coin if very little has changed around the coins code. :S I highly doubt that 6 different changes have contacted you.
<9.14.14><10.25.41.am> <Mutsumi>  add in the fact that some exchanges don't care what you say and will list it anyway, without prior contact, makes that wole statemnt look really odd and not believable
<9.14.14><10.26.12.am> <@MidasCoin>  You are "strangely" forgetting
<9.14.14><10.26.35.am> <@MidasCoin>  1- Listing our coin need details on how transaction tax are implemented
<9.14.14><10.26.52.am> <@MidasCoin>  2- If you want to be added as "approved" exchange, we require an audit
<9.14.14><10.27.12.am> <@MidasCoin>  about security procedure and other things

I find it funny... Not only do they not have interest in an exchange (them reaching out or otherwise) apparently they have to be audited, which we can all see how much security Midas has with a 51% attack in the past.

Apparently they spent 15k Euro developing the 'merchant API,' and are paying icanprogram 90 Euro an hour.
ocminer
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2660
Merit: 1240



View Profile WWW
September 16, 2014, 03:12:04 PM
 #10

It should be noted that I have failed to receive the 10 BTC bounty placed on 'Prove that block generation is centralized.' To which my answer is here: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=760755.msg8753420#msg8753420

Midas keeps disagreeing with me, and has nothing to say on WHY I'm wrong. So he has to call in the developer, who of course will say that it isn't centralized.
I was given a timeline of 24 hours once I made the support ticket for the bounty, and it has been pushed back and back and back... Now it's at 96 hours that I should expect a conversation with the actual dev about this.

Midas does not know how a coin works and keep saying that it wasn't a 51% attack.

Again, he doesn't know what he is talking about:
"All BlockChains of MidasCoin used during development will be destroyed, with a fresh genesis block created for the release."
of which the whole 'accounting' stuff means nothing and https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=784286.msg8845038#msg8845038 is just outright.

Another outright lie is this gem from the IRC channel:
Quote
<9.14.14><09.53.06.am> <@MidasCoin>  *We already received contacts by 6 different exchanges, asking to list us, and without contactin em first.  The comparison with coin that never reach exchange for lack of interests doesn't fit very will on this situation Wink
<9.14.14><10.05.35.am> <@MidasCoin>  *very well
<9.14.14><10.25.02.am> <Mutsumi>  A lot of exchanged don't list in the first few days, let alone contact a coin if very little has changed around the coins code. :S I highly doubt that 6 different changes have contacted you.
<9.14.14><10.25.41.am> <Mutsumi>  add in the fact that some exchanges don't care what you say and will list it anyway, without prior contact, makes that wole statemnt look really odd and not believable
<9.14.14><10.26.12.am> <@MidasCoin>  You are "strangely" forgetting
<9.14.14><10.26.35.am> <@MidasCoin>  1- Listing our coin need details on how transaction tax are implemented
<9.14.14><10.26.52.am> <@MidasCoin>  2- If you want to be added as "approved" exchange, we require an audit
<9.14.14><10.27.12.am> <@MidasCoin>  about security procedure and other things

I find it funny... Not only do they not have interest in an exchange (them reaching out or otherwise) apparently they have to be audited, which we can all see how much security Midas has with a 51% attack in the past.

See my post from above Smiley I can ony +1 your post..

Quote
Apparently they spent 15k Euro developing the 'merchant API,' and are paying icanprogram 90 Euro an hour.

90 € per Hour ?! WOW ! I'd take 50 € Smiley

suprnova pools - reliable mining pools - #suprnova on freenet
https://www.suprnova.cc - FOLLOW us @ Twitter ! twitter.com/SuprnovaPools
BTCspoon (OP)
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 238
Merit: 100


View Profile
September 16, 2014, 03:26:51 PM
 #11

@Multicoin:

I claimed the 10 BTC too some few posts before you did, proving the "centralized part" with another manner, of course the 10 BTC was a no show, pretending that they have no premined to pay with. Well i wasn't expecting them to be honest and pay anyway. That prove exactly what you can expect from Midas.

@ocminer

Yes, 90€ an hour is something, but for 50€ they will use your name too...as they did in their previous thread..."We are legit, because a well known user worked for us" (Icanprogram didn't signed for that). daaaaa
Multicoin
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 33
Merit: 0


View Profile WWW
September 16, 2014, 03:43:57 PM
Last edit: September 16, 2014, 04:08:10 PM by Multicoin
 #12

Well, I just got booted from the channel...
Might as well release the full logs of the channel and the queries with Midas.

Will edit post when ready.

Channel log: (small snipbits of me disconnecting and misc highlights removed.) http://pastebin.com/0rsfS3VC
Querys with Midascoin: (again, small snipbits of me disconnecting removed.) http://pastebin.com/2G8v1xtb
ocminer
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2660
Merit: 1240



View Profile WWW
September 16, 2014, 03:47:12 PM
 #13


@ocminer

Yes, 90€ an hour is something, but for 50€ they will use your name too...as they did in their previous thread..."We are legit, because a well known user worked for us" (Icanprogram didn't signed for that). daaaaa


Interesting.. I missed that part with icanprogram .. Thanks for your heads up

suprnova pools - reliable mining pools - #suprnova on freenet
https://www.suprnova.cc - FOLLOW us @ Twitter ! twitter.com/SuprnovaPools
Multicoin
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 33
Merit: 0


View Profile WWW
September 16, 2014, 03:50:22 PM
 #14

@Multicoin:

I claimed the 10 BTC too some few posts before you did, proving the "centralized part" with another manner, of course the 10 BTC was a no show, pretending that they have no premined to pay with. Well i wasn't expecting them to be honest and pay anyway. That prove exactly what you can expect from Midas.

@ocminer

Yes, 90€ an hour is something, but for 50€ they will use your name too...as they did in their previous thread..."We are legit, because a well known user worked for us" (Icanprogram didn't signed for that). daaaaa
He did sign with it.
Both of the 'whitepapers' on the Midas site were written by him.
The block tax and the transaction tax.
BTCspoon (OP)
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 238
Merit: 100


View Profile
September 18, 2014, 07:28:34 PM
 #15

@Multicoin:

I claimed the 10 BTC too some few posts before you did, proving the "centralized part" with another manner, of course the 10 BTC was a no show, pretending that they have no premined to pay with. Well i wasn't expecting them to be honest and pay anyway. That prove exactly what you can expect from Midas.

@ocminer

Yes, 90€ an hour is something, but for 50€ they will use your name too...as they did in their previous thread..."We are legit, because a well known user worked for us" (Icanprogram didn't signed for that). daaaaa
He did sign with it.
Both of the 'whitepapers' on the Midas site were written by him.
The block tax and the transaction tax.

Yes he did indeed, more like a technical howto included in the "prog" package, i guess.

*Keep in mind that the new midascoin thread is self moderated, a lot of messages disappeared.
Nxtblg
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 924
Merit: 1000



View Profile WWW
September 18, 2014, 08:21:21 PM
 #16

This happens when some people without technical knowledge try to start something they can't handle..

I can certainly see why you say that. In the quoted part of the OP, midascoin's claim of woe clearly describes a Sybil attack - yet he doesn't seem to know it.






██████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████
██████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████
███████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████▄▄▄███████████████████████
███████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████▀▀▀████████████████████████
██████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████
█████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████





...INTRODUCING WAVES........
...ULTIMATE ASSET/CUSTOM TOKEN BLOCKCHAIN PLATFORM...






BTCspoon (OP)
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 238
Merit: 100


View Profile
September 19, 2014, 03:39:36 AM
 #17

Quote from the midascoin thread #67:

I have been given early preliminary access to the code for Midascoin. The following is my review:


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA512

Verify this review at https://keybase.io/verify

midascoin (relaunch) https://github.com/MidasPaymentLTD/midascoin

Heritage: LTC (confirmed by coin author)

NOTE: This coin contains radical features. No review by me is guaranteed to be 100% accurate and catch all possible problems.

Problems:

* MAJOR: This coin is centralized by design. This means, if you don't trust the coin authors, then you should not trust this coin. They have complete control over the blockchain, and can attack it at will if desired.
** This is achieved by requiring an RSA signature on each block accepted into the network.
* MODERATE: Signatures sign an SHA1 hash of the block. SHA1 is not recommended for any cryptographic uses due to known theoretical weaknesses.
** This probably couldn't be attacked even with known collisions because it relies on sha256 as well
* MINOR: floating point operations used in protocol critical code

Notes:

Despite the complete control of the blockchain the founders have, this actually eliminates many common attacks, such as double spends and orphan blocks.
The coin authors can do all these attacks, but no one else can.
The other big concern is that if the key is ever leaked, a signficant amount of damage could be done and would require a retroactive hard fork to fix. Clients have basic fork detection, but nothing that prevents a huge fork take over.

Blockchain not analyzed. This is based on preliminary code. Commit hash f1a3d1f1e996ce9b4fc753bd814ec5b1ecd1474f

This could've been kept random if script parsing (for the output address) would've been done.
- -                        // Insert change txn at random position:
- -                        vector<CTxOut>::iterator position = wtxNew.vout.begin()+GetRandInt(wtxNew.vout.size()+1);
- -                        wtxNew.vout.insert(position, newTxOut);
+                        // Note: This makes change obvious, which leads to loss of privacy.
+                        // However, it's necessary to make the distinction here, since not making it would mean the change would be taxed too.
+                        // Insert change txn at the end
+                        wtxNew.vout.push_back(newTxOut);

Watermarks: uint64
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: Keybase OpenPGP v1.0.5
Comment: https://keybase.io/crypto
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=UbWX
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


at which Midas answered #68:

Seem  that customers and exchange can sleep with the reopening.
No double spend anymore with crypto using #midascoin, never again.

I think, again, by saying that, you (Midas) miss all the point of cryptocurrency: No trust and decentralized is the rule. as pointed numerous times in the old thread.

earlz did a pretty nice review.
BTCspoon (OP)
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 238
Merit: 100


View Profile
September 19, 2014, 08:48:19 PM
Last edit: September 21, 2014, 09:32:57 PM by BTCspoon
 #18

So let's summarize a little for the sake of it:

- Totally Centralized coin.
- 1% Transaction Tax! (Even worst than premine)
- They use 90%+ of your Hashpower to mine some random coin with value (LTC and other scrypt, but basically LTC).
- Then They Pay you back with a coin Midascoin, with no market value (at best 1/2 of the value, you would have if you were mining LTC directly).
- With 1 market/exchange, 1 Pool, only till the end of time (theirs of course).

Something missing?
Yuzu
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 368
Merit: 250



View Profile
September 19, 2014, 09:06:06 PM
 #19

I'm still getting emails from Midascoin though I told them not to spam my email.  Useless scam coin with zero value.
BTCspoon (OP)
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 238
Merit: 100


View Profile
September 20, 2014, 05:15:51 AM
 #20

I'm still getting emails from Midascoin though I told them not to spam my email.  Useless scam coin with zero value.
About the spam, yes they still do it..., collected from who know where..., they have no words or limits. The interesting part is when they'll bail out (without paying the 10TC they owe, or buying back the coins as they said), the email they collected from the pool will probably be their payback. Be ready to see tones of unwanted emails soon.

The bright and funny part is, they collected and spammed the wrong emails from the start, the DB they got was labelled "Warning! don't use these".
Pages: [1] 2 »  All
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!