|
bigc1984
|
 |
September 15, 2014, 11:29:12 PM |
|
Yea, I will be hosting an official pool for the coin (p2pool). Other pools will have to advertise somewhere else (sorry but I don't like risking a 51% attack like last time). Deepcoin didn't release their python hash module so I don't think I could create a p2pool and X11 has a lot of votes right now so that's what I think i'm going to go with. The last supply will be only 10% ? Do I understand right?
Just create a new coin... why use INT for that?
Only 10 coins per block. 40% premine to cover the redistribution. We're using INT because we want to bring it back to life, however we may need to change a lot of it's features. +1 deephash it uses less electricity and runs coolers then any other algo |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Transactions must be included in a block to be properly completed. When you send a transaction, it is broadcast to miners. Miners can then optionally include it in their next blocks. Miners will be more inclined to include your transaction if it has a higher transaction fee.
|
|
|
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Valzador (OP)
|
|
September 15, 2014, 11:29:47 PM |
|
Yea, I will be hosting an official pool for the coin (p2pool). Other pools will have to advertise somewhere else (sorry but I don't like risking a 51% attack like last time). Deepcoin didn't release their python hash module so I don't think I could create a p2pool and X11 has a lot of votes right now so that's what I think i'm going to go with. The last supply will be only 10% ? Do I understand right?
Just create a new coin... why use INT for that?
Only 10 coins per block. 40% premine to cover the redistribution. We're using INT because we want to bring it back to life, however we may need to change a lot of it's features. +1 deephash it uses less electricity and runs coolers then any other algo I'll have a closer look at deephash. |
|
|
|
|
|
Valzador (OP)
|
|
September 16, 2014, 01:53:15 AM |
|
Unfortunately I haven't' received any offer for the logo.
I hate to do this, but PLEASE REMOVE THE LOGO AND ADDITIONAL GRAPHICS.
Unfortunately it is not your property and permission of usage has not been granted.
Thank you
We are still working out on a deal, so please be patient. The official revival starts on the 19th, so that's when you should expect the logos and other graphics to be taken down. |
|
|
|
|
givemeyourcoin
Newbie
 Offline
Activity: 56
Merit: 0
|
|
September 16, 2014, 02:15:46 AM |
|
INT on bittrex,not INL.  |
|
|
|
|
|
Valzador (OP)
|
|
September 16, 2014, 03:21:47 AM |
|
INT on bittrex,not INL. Yes, we are changing the coin as this coin may have security flaws. |
|
|
|
|
eminent666
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 16
Merit: 0
|
|
September 16, 2014, 07:44:46 AM |
|
I don't know exactly what are your plan for redistribution
But consider making it "IPO style"
10M coins that will be devided according to one's shares of INT
In case that not all INT will be claimed it will benefit current holders
|
|
|
|
|
|
Valzador (OP)
|
|
September 16, 2014, 07:50:36 AM |
|
I don't know exactly what are your plan for redistribution
But consider making it "IPO style"
10M coins that will be devided according to one's shares of INT
In case that not all INT will be claimed it will benefit current holders
Yea, that's what I was thinking. Have an IPO and make people buy INL with their existing INT. They can also purchase INL with BTC but people with INT will have a better exchange ratio. |
|
|
|
|
goingplaces
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 13
Merit: 0
|
|
September 16, 2014, 08:40:52 AM |
|
I don't know exactly what are your plan for redistribution
But consider making it "IPO style"
10M coins that will be devided according to one's shares of INT
In case that not all INT will be claimed it will benefit current holders
Yea, that's what I was thinking. Have an IPO and make people buy INL with their existing INT. They can also purchase INL with BTC but people with INT will have a better exchange ratio. Just to remind you that dev walked away after the holders shouted on the idea of new IPO... You are doing here the same shit.... Trying to raise BTC from an IPO for an already dead coin? I don't think so.... I call you to drop the idea of purchasing INL with BTC Leave the redistribution ONLY to INT holders |
|
|
|
|
|
Valzador (OP)
|
|
September 16, 2014, 09:06:44 AM |
|
I don't know exactly what are your plan for redistribution
But consider making it "IPO style"
10M coins that will be devided according to one's shares of INT
In case that not all INT will be claimed it will benefit current holders
Yea, that's what I was thinking. Have an IPO and make people buy INL with their existing INT. They can also purchase INL with BTC but people with INT will have a better exchange ratio. Just to remind you that dev walked away after the holders shouted on the idea of new IPO... You are doing here the same shit.... Trying to raise BTC from an IPO for an already dead coin? I don't think so.... I call you to drop the idea of purchasing INL with BTC Leave the redistribution ONLY to INT holders Well the premine is only 10 million coins, which covers the already existing 8 million. The left overs will be used to cover late exchangers and a small BTC fund. |
|
|
|
|
Ingramtg
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 861
Merit: 1000
|
|
September 16, 2014, 09:11:39 AM |
|
DeepHash is good i think
|
|
|
|
|
|
Valzador (OP)
|
|
September 16, 2014, 10:42:22 AM |
|
Well, it seems we don't have rights to use the old IntelliCoin logo.
That pretty much kills the revival, unless you are willing to trade your INT for a new coin, with a totally different algo, name and logo.
Deephash won vote 4 -2
|
|
|
|
|
cyberspacemonkey
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1288
Merit: 1002
|
|
September 16, 2014, 08:09:59 PM |
|
Well, it seems we don't have rights to use the old IntelliCoin logo.
That pretty much kills the revival, unless you are willing to trade your INT for a new coin, with a totally different algo, name and logo.
Deephash won vote 4 -2
Why don't we just make a simple logo for now? Or a quick Logo contest? I don't see why the stupid logo would take a poop on the whole project.  |
|
|
|
|
|
Valzador (OP)
|
|
September 16, 2014, 10:49:24 PM |
|
Well, it seems we don't have rights to use the old IntelliCoin logo.
That pretty much kills the revival, unless you are willing to trade your INT for a new coin, with a totally different algo, name and logo.
Deephash won vote 4 -2
Why don't we just make a simple logo for now? Or a quick Logo contest? I don't see why the stupid logo would take a poop on the whole project. We need funds for a contest. |
|
|
|
|
cyberspacemonkey
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1288
Merit: 1002
|
|
September 16, 2014, 11:07:51 PM |
|
Well, it seems we don't have rights to use the old IntelliCoin logo.
That pretty much kills the revival, unless you are willing to trade your INT for a new coin, with a totally different algo, name and logo.
Deephash won vote 4 -2
Why don't we just make a simple logo for now? Or a quick Logo contest? I don't see why the stupid logo would take a poop on the whole project. We need funds for a contest. Even if you start a new coin, wouldn't that require a logo also? |
|
|
|
|
|
Valzador (OP)
|
|
September 17, 2014, 01:53:30 AM |
|
Well, it seems we don't have rights to use the old IntelliCoin logo.
That pretty much kills the revival, unless you are willing to trade your INT for a new coin, with a totally different algo, name and logo.
Deephash won vote 4 -2
Why don't we just make a simple logo for now? Or a quick Logo contest? I don't see why the stupid logo would take a poop on the whole project. We need funds for a contest. Even if you start a new coin, wouldn't that require a logo also? Yes, but what we were trying to do was a revival of INT. Without the logo we pretty much have removed everything that was part of the original project. |
|
|
|
|
cyberspacemonkey
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1288
Merit: 1002
|
|
September 17, 2014, 03:58:27 AM |
|
|
|
|
|
|
shiftf5
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 16
Merit: 0
|
|
September 17, 2014, 06:01:22 AM |
|
Well, it seems we don't have rights to use the old IntelliCoin logo.
That pretty much kills the revival, unless you are willing to trade your INT for a new coin, with a totally different algo, name and logo.
Deephash won vote 4 -2
Why don't we just make a simple logo for now? Or a quick Logo contest? I don't see why the stupid logo would take a poop on the whole project. We need funds for a contest. Even if you start a new coin, wouldn't that require a logo also? Yes, but what we were trying to do was a revival of INT. Without the logo we pretty much have removed everything that was part of the original project. So set up a bounty for the 0.5 btc left to be paid to bitcrea.... |
|
|
|
|
|
Valzador (OP)
|
|
September 17, 2014, 08:52:59 AM |
|
Thank you Hardroad for providing an amazing logo!!!I will get his address of him for you guys to tip him  Tip: SignatureCoins: SnbDiNegmwTQtGNTpokJiTpvQKAnBsYGLm
|
|
|
|
|
Dan2014
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 20
Merit: 0
|
|
September 17, 2014, 09:49:12 AM |
|
If you are going to change the whole specification you should really just create a new coin. If you want to revive the existing one, you shouldn't make all these changes to it
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pebbelzz
|
|
September 17, 2014, 02:35:02 PM |
|
If you are going to change the whole specification you should really just create a new coin. If you want to revive the existing one, you shouldn't make all these changes to it
No problem with reviving a coin and making some changes, it wasn't going anywhere in it's current state so it's not like it's hurting anything by doing this, what's the worst that can happen? It stays dormant like it was because no one was doing anything. At least this way it breathes new life into a dead coin. |
|
|
|
|
Poll
