Bitcoin Forum
March 25, 2017, 03:53:20 PM *
News: Latest stable version of Bitcoin Core: 0.14.0  [Torrent]. (New!)
   Home   Help Search Donate Login Register  
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: BitCoin as support to local Community Currencies.  (Read 581 times)
Offline Offline

Activity: 1

View Profile WWW
April 29, 2012, 03:35:09 PM

For local economy Community Currencies  (or LETS, local exchange trading systems), the security requirements are not as high as for electronic money aimed at the global economy.

In fact, and until a number of enterprises is running at the local markets and the relationships are understood intuitively, probably at the beginning its safe to issue the currency contracts electronically but the circulation is all in paper vouchers. That is, to conceive the Community Currency as electronic by design but with a stamping of the electronic records in paper vouchers.

Community Currencies are directly backed by real products and services, not an artificial intermediary of value like gold or silver. And, the Issuer of Credit Coin is only responsible for providing its own products and or services in return for its Credit Coin, never “money” in any form. This is a very important point. In the Credit Coin System, an Issuer’s ability to honor its credit is never dependent on the general availability of “money” in the economy, the way the ability to pay back bank loans are. The Issuer’s sole responsibility in issuing Credit Coin is that the Issuer must be able to redeem its own Credit Coin with its own products and/or services.

In order to facilitate the coexistence of different currencies at multiLETS economy islands is important is that all LETS currencies express the commitment about redemption of goods or services in the same common format, like, for example, a Ricardian Contract ( using a common schema ( .

In the simplest possible terms, a Ricardian Contract is a formatted document that is both human readable and program parsable. It identifies a Legal Issuer and an Issuance Server, and includes (OpenPGP) keys for those parties. The document is signed in (OpenPGP) cleartext form by the Legal Issuer's contract signing key. A unique identifier is formed by a canonical message digest (hash) which provides an unforgeable link to the accounting system.

Note, anyhow, that BitCoin does not represent any good, does not embody any Ricardian contract committing products or services, and is therefore not suited for internal local economy barter trade based on Community Currencies.

However, Community Currencies are not suited at all for capital, investment or credit, as they extinguish in the period of one production cycle. Another type of contract is needed. For this purpose we could use a crypto coin not linked to the Fractional Reserve Banking, but exchangeable whenever needed. All in all, a good candidate to play that role looks to be BitCoin. It is also very suited as a tracking tool for non secured transactions of coins Ricardian Contract based schemas.

Find out more here ...

Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction. Advertise here.
Stephen Gornick
Offline Offline

Activity: 2086

View Profile
April 30, 2012, 12:30:57 AM

I stopped reading after:

Old money should never contaminate the new economy islands. Goods produced in the economy islands should in principle not be sold to the external FRBS world by any individual island citizen. Exports should be regulated and managed carefully by the island authority.

If the system needs to be protected (by force, presumably) from outside influence for survival, is that not a flaw?
Phinnaeus Gage
Offline Offline

Activity: 1358

Bitcoin: An Idea Worth Spending

View Profile
April 30, 2012, 02:45:01 AM

Watching! (this is the first time I've posted that one-word-post)
Pages: [1]
Jump to:  

Sponsored by , a Bitcoin-accepting VPN.
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!