Bitcoin Forum
October 20, 2017, 08:20:25 PM *
News: Latest stable version of Bitcoin Core:  [Torrent]. (New!)
   Home   Help Search Donate Login Register  
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: 2012-04-30 Killing off cash  (Read 1177 times)
Full Member
Offline Offline

Activity: 140

View Profile
April 30, 2012, 03:40:12 PM

Killing off cash

April 30, 2012 Written by James Middleton

One recurring point made by almost everyone we spoke to for our mobile money special, was that cash is of no value to anybody in this ecosystem. The cash value chain features the smallest number of participants – the buyer and the seller – with no opportunity for anyone else to skim a wafer thin transaction charge off the top. Moreover, cash is seen as inconvenient and insecure, and some might argue it’s on the way to getting a bad rep as a payment mechanism. So will digital triumph by virtue alone?

Digital currency on the other hand is effectively a non-political monetary unit that shares something in common with cash – it has to be completely anonymous. If you ‘lose’ your digital currency, it’s gone, just like dropping a banknote in the street.
MintChip, although it is digital, is backed by the Canadian dollar and centrally distributed by the Mint, which in some eyes, puts it at a disadvantage. Since most of the world abandoned the gold standard in the 1970s and currency instead became fiat money – that is to say, currency with a value controlled by the government —  there is no limit to the amount of money that can be issued. Fiat money is also susceptible to the effects on inflation from a single entity, such as a government.
Conversely, Bitcoin– a somewhat controversial but truly digital currency – claims to have solved the issue of state interference and anonymity, using a decentralised distribution system and an absolute limit of 21 million Bitcoins. Bitcoin is not backed by anything, but its value comes from its scarcity, like gold. Each coin is divisible by a factor of eight, and the currency’s supporters expect that as some coins are irretrievably lost, the value of the remaining coins will be pushed up slightly. While the decentralised nature means that no one entity can have an impact on inflation of the currency.
The currency has its detractors, which believe that Bitcoin’s lack of an underlying power base puts the currency on thin ice. But for many investors, this is exactly what attracts them. Anecdotal claims suggest that a large percentage of professional investors have bought into Bitcoin and are seeking to invest in related start-ups.

Hero Member
Offline Offline

Posts: 1508530825

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Reply with quote  #2

Report to moderator
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction. Advertise here.
Stephen Gornick
Offline Offline

Activity: 2296

View Profile
April 30, 2012, 09:31:28 PM

From the article:

n the subtle difference between digital currency and virtual currency. Most of our feature length coverage focuses on virtual currency, or the moving of state issued money from the realm of the physical – coins and notes – to more portable and secure bits and bytes.

I would consider Linden dollars (the currency used in Second Life from Linden Lab) as a virtual currency.  That is not state issued money.  (And incidentally, can be traded to and from Bitcoins on VirWoX and others).

Digital currency on the other hand is effectively a non-political monetary unit that shares something in common with cash – it has to be completely anonymous.

It has to be anonymous?  There goes Bitcoin as being a digital currency.

There's a lot of leeway with the vocabulary. I even see Visa refer to themselves as a digital currency company.

Pages: [1]
Jump to:  

Sponsored by , a Bitcoin-accepting VPN.
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!