|
pvnamk19
|
 |
September 28, 2014, 04:52:23 AM |
|
Sorry for a noop questions: I clicked the link to download the latest wallet from the OP but after downloading Chrome gave an alarm about malicious softwares and deleted it. Why that? Is there anyone experience the same issue?
Thanks!
The link is on Dropbox. If that's a problem I can post it somewhere else. Yes, can you post it somewhere else for us? BTW, Minerpools and Coin-miners now reflect the same Net Hashrate. Can you confirm that they are mining on the same official fork ? Thanks! |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
I HATE TABLES I HATE TABLES I HA(╯°□°）╯︵ ┻━┻ TABLES I HATE TABLES I HATE TABLES
|
|
|
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction.
|
|
coinweaver (OP)
|
|
September 28, 2014, 05:43:35 AM |
|
Sorry for a noop questions: I clicked the link to download the latest wallet from the OP but after downloading Chrome gave an alarm about malicious softwares and deleted it. Why that? Is there anyone experience the same issue?
Thanks!
The link is on Dropbox. If that's a problem I can post it somewhere else. Yes, can you post it somewhere else for us? BTW, Minerpools and Coin-miners now reflect the same Net Hashrate. Can you confirm that they are mining on the same official fork ? Thanks! They are. The seed node is indeed misbehaving. I'm going to correct it now. It was still receiving bad blocks from somewhere and was rebroadcasting them. |
|
|
|
|
|
stormia
|
|
September 28, 2014, 06:12:49 AM |
|
The message on the front page of MinerPools is incorrect.
The seed node has them as an addnode and when the seed node was updated we deleted the peers.dat to rediscover the network through them.
Edit to add: if they are seeing something we are not then let's compare notes and see what's up.
Can you answer what im asking.Why was the fork with the most miners on it and would stand to lose the most coins not consider the right fork.Just want to know the reasoning for this.It makes no sense. The right fork was the one Bryce and friends were on  |
|
|
|
|
|
coinweaver (OP)
|
|
September 28, 2014, 06:32:34 AM |
|
The message on the front page of MinerPools is incorrect.
The seed node has them as an addnode and when the seed node was updated we deleted the peers.dat to rediscover the network through them.
Edit to add: if they are seeing something we are not then let's compare notes and see what's up.
Can you answer what im asking.Why was the fork with the most miners on it and would stand to lose the most coins not consider the right fork.Just want to know the reasoning for this.It makes no sense. The right fork was the one Bryce and friends were on I'll be happy to start moderating the thread if you are unable to read it. That's clearly not the case. The network suffered some rocking and rolling today and is attempting to correct. It was designed to work that way. The assumption is always that someone is trying to screw over the community because that is what has happened since this forum first went online. The assumption being made specifically in this case is that we're somehow trying to screw over the community as opposed to resolving a technical problem for the long term. I simply expect such comments like this will continue forever, so it is only on rare occasions like this one that I bother to respond. |
|
|
|
|
|
stormia
|
|
September 28, 2014, 06:41:15 AM |
|
The message on the front page of MinerPools is incorrect.
The seed node has them as an addnode and when the seed node was updated we deleted the peers.dat to rediscover the network through them.
Edit to add: if they are seeing something we are not then let's compare notes and see what's up.
Can you answer what im asking.Why was the fork with the most miners on it and would stand to lose the most coins not consider the right fork.Just want to know the reasoning for this.It makes no sense. The right fork was the one Bryce and friends were on I'll be happy to start moderating the thread if you are unable to read it. That's clearly not the case. The network suffered some rocking and rolling today and is attempting to correct. It was designed to work that way. The assumption is always that someone is trying to screw over the community because that is what has happened since this forum first went online. The assumption being made specifically in this case is that we're somehow trying to screw over the community as opposed to resolving a technical problem for the long term. I simply expect such comments like this will continue forever, so it is only on rare occasions like this one that I bother to respond. You shouldn't have, it was simply a joke. Notice the winky face? Don't be so defensive, it almost makes it seem as though you have something to feel guilty of Also, you can't start moderating this thread... you made it unmoderated, you would have to make another. Are you new here ? |
|
|
|
|
|
coinweaver (OP)
|
|
September 28, 2014, 06:52:52 AM |
|
The message on the front page of MinerPools is incorrect.
The seed node has them as an addnode and when the seed node was updated we deleted the peers.dat to rediscover the network through them.
Edit to add: if they are seeing something we are not then let's compare notes and see what's up.
Can you answer what im asking.Why was the fork with the most miners on it and would stand to lose the most coins not consider the right fork.Just want to know the reasoning for this.It makes no sense. The right fork was the one Bryce and friends were on I'll be happy to start moderating the thread if you are unable to read it. That's clearly not the case. The network suffered some rocking and rolling today and is attempting to correct. It was designed to work that way. The assumption is always that someone is trying to screw over the community because that is what has happened since this forum first went online. The assumption being made specifically in this case is that we're somehow trying to screw over the community as opposed to resolving a technical problem for the long term. I simply expect such comments like this will continue forever, so it is only on rare occasions like this one that I bother to respond. You shouldn't have, it was simply a joke. Notice the winky face? Don't be so defensive, it almost makes it seem as though you have something to feel guilty of Also, you can't start moderating this thread... you made it unmoderated, you would have to make another. Are you new here ? Hahaha.. fair enough. It's been a long day, as you can imagine. Meanwhile, the seed node has been corrected. I repeated the exercise of deleting the peers (and blockchain database) and explored the network through MinerPools. |
|
|
|
|
|
idol
|
|
September 28, 2014, 07:00:32 AM |
|
dev you think its funny? your friends mine some foking unknown pool and you say its the right fork? while ppl with rented rigs mine on pool with 700+ th and its the wrong fork? you need to come up with better excuse  |
|
|
|
achow101
Staff
Legendary
 Offline
Activity: 3388
Merit: 6631
Just writing some code
|
|
September 28, 2014, 07:03:22 AM |
|
WOW NICE!! COINS  |
|
|
|
abats
Member
Offline
Activity: 98
Merit: 10
|
|
September 28, 2014, 07:14:07 AM |
|
Dev，minerpools is on the right chain?
|
|
|
|
|
|
coinweaver (OP)
|
|
September 28, 2014, 07:19:56 AM |
|
Dev，minerpools is on the right chain?
Absolutely. We've repeatedly sync'd the seed node against it. |
|
|
|
|
|
idol
|
|
September 28, 2014, 07:23:09 AM |
|
Dev，minerpools is on the right chain?
Absolutely. We've repeatedly sync'd the seed node against it. so what about the 16000 coin i lost? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
coinweaver (OP)
|
|
September 28, 2014, 07:31:52 AM |
|
This is why I said the front page of MP was in error. The seed node is sync'ing against Minerpools. If coin-miners disagrees then they have a problem. |
|
|
|
|
abats
Member
Offline
Activity: 98
Merit: 10
|
|
September 28, 2014, 07:35:03 AM |
|
But the new wallet and coin - miners is consistent, which ore pool should I choose?
|
|
|
|
|
|
idol
|
|
September 28, 2014, 07:35:53 AM |
|
But the new wallet and coin - miners is consistent, which ore pool should I choose?
ask the dev which pool he is on thats the right one lol |
|
|
|
|
coinweaver (OP)
|
|
September 28, 2014, 07:41:04 AM |
|
But the new wallet and coin - miners is consistent, which ore pool should I choose?
Oh... I'm sorry. I didn't understand your question. If those agree then it's totally up to you. |
|
|
|
|
|
coinweaver (OP)
|
|
September 28, 2014, 07:42:46 AM |
|
We had no private pool. Sorry, that's simply not what happened.
|
|
|
|
|
|
HunterS
|
|
September 28, 2014, 07:43:20 AM |
|
dev or his friends mined on a different fork with very low hashrate while everyone else mined on the one with huge hashrate ,
so he made the one with the least hashrate the one he mined on the "right" fork
meanwhile my 4200 coins that were very expensive to mine are gone!
yes pretty bad form.I am still waiting on a answer as to why you wouldnt use the fork where less coin and miners are affected.just make no sense to me. |
|
|
|
abats
Member
Offline
Activity: 98
Merit: 10
|
|
September 28, 2014, 07:44:27 AM |
|
We had no private pool. Sorry, that's simply not what happened.
Dev, you tell me the chain is correct? thank you！ |
|
|
|
|
|
coinweaver (OP)
|
|
September 28, 2014, 07:44:39 AM |
|
dev or his friends mined on a different fork with very low hashrate while everyone else mined on the one with huge hashrate ,
so he made the one with the least hashrate the one he mined on the "right" fork
meanwhile my 4200 coins that were very expensive to mine are gone!
yes pretty bad form.I am still waiting on a answer as to why you wouldnt use the fork where less coin and miners are affected.just make no sense to me. I didn't "choose" a fork. If you'd like to indicate how that's possible then I'd like to hear it. Minerpools had the most hash power. Edit to add: i've stated that we've repeatedly re-sync'd the seed node against Minerpools and still getting bad peers. |
|
|
|
|
|
