GLBSE better, harder, stronger, faster, cheaper now with MAKER/TAKER

[Nefario]

I've made some much needed performance changes, the site is now usable (please don't go hammering it), but shouldn't fall over when more than a few users visit.

Still plenty of more performance improvements to be made.

One useful addition is the refresh button beside the orderbook table, it will update the orderbook, pulling json data from the GLBSE api. No more need to refresh the entire page.

[sunnankar]

I've made some much needed performance changes, the site is now usable (please don't go hammering it), but shouldn't fall over when more than a few users visit.

Still plenty of more performance improvements to be made.

One useful addition is the refresh button beside the orderbook table, it will update the orderbook, pulling json data from the GLBSE api. No more need to refresh the entire page.

Nice work Nefario. Thanks for working away on this very helpful tool for the BitCoin community.

[DeaDTerra]

I've made some much needed performance changes, the site is now usable (please don't go hammering it), but shouldn't fall over when more than a few users visit.

Still plenty of more performance improvements to be made.

One useful addition is the refresh button beside the orderbook table, it will update the orderbook, pulling json data from the GLBSE api. No more need to refresh the entire page.

Sorry to say that am still getting 400 bad request errors :8
I like the new updates on the order book and order history though
//DeaDTerra

[conspirosphere.tk]

Sorry to say that am still getting 400 bad request errors :8
I like the new updates on the order book and order history though
//DeaDTerra

I was getting similar errors from 24 hours, until I closed and reopened my browser.
Maybe is a coincidence, but just try.

[DeaDTerra]

Sorry to say that am still getting 400 bad request errors :8
I like the new updates on the order book and order history though
//DeaDTerra

I was getting similar errors from 24 hours, until I closed and reopened my browser.
Maybe is a coincidence, but just try.

Sorry tried it and I still get the same error :8
//DeaDTerra

[Nefario]

400 errors have been fixed.

[DeaDTerra]

400 errors have been fixed.

Thank you, I no longer have any problems
//DeaDTerra

[conspirosphere.tk]

Any way to see older transaction in my portfolio?
I can see just my buy history of last week and dividend history of last 2 weeks.

[Nefario]

Any way to see older transaction in my portfolio?
I can see just my buy history of last week and dividend history of last 2 weeks.

I'm adding CSV export for history over 10 records.

[Turbor]

GLBSE rocks ! It's fun.

[Nefario]

Full account history CSV export now live.

Link at the top of your portfolio page.

[Sukrim]

Great, however I encountered a weird bug(?):

Available balance displayed: 0.0401499, Bid (unmatched!) for 4 shares of HEDGE at 0.01 BTC is NOT possible!
After a bid for 3 shares at 0.01 BTC: "Available: 0.0099999" - my bid did freeze 301500 Satoshis. As the bid is NOT immediately matched though, I should be able to place the remaining bid too, if I have the funds and my first bid did not get executed right away. I wonder if the system only freezes the 0.5% fee or if it even silently charges it too... /tinfoilhat

tl;dr: Even nonexecuted bids in the orderbook get the additional 0.5% fee frozen for no apparent reason to me.

[brendio]

Great, however I encountered a weird bug(?):

Available balance displayed: 0.0401499, Bid (unmatched!) for 4 shares of HEDGE at 0.01 BTC is NOT possible!
After a bid for 3 shares at 0.01 BTC: "Available: 0.0099999" - my bid did freeze 301500 Satoshis. As the bid is NOT immediately matched though, I should be able to place the remaining bid too, if I have the funds and my first bid did not get executed right away. I wonder if the system only freezes the 0.5% fee or if it even silently charges it too... /tinfoilhat

tl;dr: Even nonexecuted bids in the orderbook get the additional 0.5% fee frozen for no apparent reason to me.

Sorry, I don't see why that should be non-apparent. You need enough funds to fulfil not only your bids, but also the fees on them.

[Sukrim]

But as soon as they don't get executed right away, I'm a maker and won't have to pay fees - so why freeze them?

[brendio]

But as soon as they don't get executed right away, I'm a maker and won't have to pay fees - so why freeze them?

Oh, I forgot about the fee split. In that case, yes, you have a point.

[Nefario]

But as soon as they don't get executed right away, I'm a maker and won't have to pay fees - so why freeze them?

Thats a good point. Actually this is a holdover from the old fee system, and needs to be fixed.