Best thread in Bitcointalk.org history?

[h4xx0r]

I vote for any of the "I hate VOD" threads.

fuck yeah that guy is a fucking asshole troll. i thought he was cool until he fucking got me

Don't get me wrong, I very much respect and admire VOD. I just think it is funny as to what lengths people go to try to "get back at" VOD for giving them negative trust and ruining their scam attempt.

I strongly support having a special subforum for "I hate VOD" threads

i have no respect for him. he uses the trust system to carry out his vendettas instead of confronting someone like a man. i cannot respect that at all, no matter what logic that faggot tries to use to justify it.

There is nothing to confront. To ask to be confronted doing what you are doing is like asking the police to confront you prior to arresting you when you rob a store at gunpoint in front of the police. There is no question as to what you were trying to do.

If you dislike him so much then create another "I hate VOD" thread so he can disprove your arguments, we have another thread to add to the list and so I can have a smile on my face

ha, excellent faggot logic. here's your prize. i hear its halloween season so i dressed your pumpkin for the occasion.

Well I am glad that you responded to my logical argument with maturity

logical argument? your whole argument is "Vod's right and you're wrong. how can you even question it!"

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Occam's_razor

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Russell%27s_teapot

Well you are wrong. and consequently Vod is right. There were plenty of people that agreed with VOD in the thread you opened in Meta.

Also, out of curiosity, how old are you? What is the longest you have held a job for?

The court of public opinion isn't always right. end discussion. agree to disagree.

[Quickseller]

I vote for any of the "I hate VOD" threads.

fuck yeah that guy is a fucking asshole troll. i thought he was cool until he fucking got me

Don't get me wrong, I very much respect and admire VOD. I just think it is funny as to what lengths people go to try to "get back at" VOD for giving them negative trust and ruining their scam attempt.

I strongly support having a special subforum for "I hate VOD" threads

i have no respect for him. he uses the trust system to carry out his vendettas instead of confronting someone like a man. i cannot respect that at all, no matter what logic that faggot tries to use to justify it.

There is nothing to confront. To ask to be confronted doing what you are doing is like asking the police to confront you prior to arresting you when you rob a store at gunpoint in front of the police. There is no question as to what you were trying to do.

If you dislike him so much then create another "I hate VOD" thread so he can disprove your arguments, we have another thread to add to the list and so I can have a smile on my face

ha, excellent faggot logic. here's your prize. i hear its halloween season so i dressed your pumpkin for the occasion.

Well I am glad that you responded to my logical argument with maturity

logical argument? your whole argument is "Vod's right and you're wrong. how can you even question it!"

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Occam's_razor

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Russell%27s_teapot

Well you are wrong. and consequently Vod is right. There were plenty of people that agreed with VOD in the thread you opened in Meta.

Also, out of curiosity, how old are you? What is the longest you have held a job for?

The court of public opinion isn't always right. end discussion. agree to disagree.

The court of public opinion is not always right. I did not see anyone that was agreeing with your point of view. Most of the time the court of public opinion at least has two sides, but in this case it is just the one.

[h4xx0r]

I vote for any of the "I hate VOD" threads.

fuck yeah that guy is a fucking asshole troll. i thought he was cool until he fucking got me

Don't get me wrong, I very much respect and admire VOD. I just think it is funny as to what lengths people go to try to "get back at" VOD for giving them negative trust and ruining their scam attempt.

I strongly support having a special subforum for "I hate VOD" threads

i have no respect for him. he uses the trust system to carry out his vendettas instead of confronting someone like a man. i cannot respect that at all, no matter what logic that faggot tries to use to justify it.

There is nothing to confront. To ask to be confronted doing what you are doing is like asking the police to confront you prior to arresting you when you rob a store at gunpoint in front of the police. There is no question as to what you were trying to do.

If you dislike him so much then create another "I hate VOD" thread so he can disprove your arguments, we have another thread to add to the list and so I can have a smile on my face

ha, excellent faggot logic. here's your prize. i hear its halloween season so i dressed your pumpkin for the occasion.

Well I am glad that you responded to my logical argument with maturity

logical argument? your whole argument is "Vod's right and you're wrong. how can you even question it!"

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Occam's_razor

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Russell%27s_teapot

Well you are wrong. and consequently Vod is right. There were plenty of people that agreed with VOD in the thread you opened in Meta.

Also, out of curiosity, how old are you? What is the longest you have held a job for?

The court of public opinion isn't always right. end discussion. agree to disagree.

The court of public opinion is not always right. I did not see anyone that was agreeing with your point of view. Most of the time the court of public opinion at least has two sides, but in this case it is just the one.

That doesn't make any sense. No one agreed publically for fear of getting negative trust . i got plenty of pm's though.

[Quickseller]

I vote for any of the "I hate VOD" threads.

fuck yeah that guy is a fucking asshole troll. i thought he was cool until he fucking got me

Don't get me wrong, I very much respect and admire VOD. I just think it is funny as to what lengths people go to try to "get back at" VOD for giving them negative trust and ruining their scam attempt.

I strongly support having a special subforum for "I hate VOD" threads

i have no respect for him. he uses the trust system to carry out his vendettas instead of confronting someone like a man. i cannot respect that at all, no matter what logic that faggot tries to use to justify it.

There is nothing to confront. To ask to be confronted doing what you are doing is like asking the police to confront you prior to arresting you when you rob a store at gunpoint in front of the police. There is no question as to what you were trying to do.

If you dislike him so much then create another "I hate VOD" thread so he can disprove your arguments, we have another thread to add to the list and so I can have a smile on my face

ha, excellent faggot logic. here's your prize. i hear its halloween season so i dressed your pumpkin for the occasion.

Well I am glad that you responded to my logical argument with maturity

logical argument? your whole argument is "Vod's right and you're wrong. how can you even question it!"

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Occam's_razor

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Russell%27s_teapot

Well you are wrong. and consequently Vod is right. There were plenty of people that agreed with VOD in the thread you opened in Meta.

Also, out of curiosity, how old are you? What is the longest you have held a job for?

The court of public opinion isn't always right. end discussion. agree to disagree.

The court of public opinion is not always right. I did not see anyone that was agreeing with your point of view. Most of the time the court of public opinion at least has two sides, but in this case it is just the one.

That doesn't make any sense. No one agreed publically for fear of getting negative trust . i got plenty of pm's though.

I am sure you did

[b!z]

^ best thread looks like this one.

[h4xx0r]

I vote for any of the "I hate VOD" threads.

fuck yeah that guy is a fucking asshole troll. i thought he was cool until he fucking got me

Don't get me wrong, I very much respect and admire VOD. I just think it is funny as to what lengths people go to try to "get back at" VOD for giving them negative trust and ruining their scam attempt.

I strongly support having a special subforum for "I hate VOD" threads

i have no respect for him. he uses the trust system to carry out his vendettas instead of confronting someone like a man. i cannot respect that at all, no matter what logic that faggot tries to use to justify it.

There is nothing to confront. To ask to be confronted doing what you are doing is like asking the police to confront you prior to arresting you when you rob a store at gunpoint in front of the police. There is no question as to what you were trying to do.

If you dislike him so much then create another "I hate VOD" thread so he can disprove your arguments, we have another thread to add to the list and so I can have a smile on my face

ha, excellent faggot logic. here's your prize. i hear its halloween season so i dressed your pumpkin for the occasion.

Well I am glad that you responded to my logical argument with maturity

logical argument? your whole argument is "Vod's right and you're wrong. how can you even question it!"

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Occam's_razor

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Russell%27s_teapot

Well you are wrong. and consequently Vod is right. There were plenty of people that agreed with VOD in the thread you opened in Meta.

Also, out of curiosity, how old are you? What is the longest you have held a job for?

The court of public opinion isn't always right. end discussion. agree to disagree.

The court of public opinion is not always right. I did not see anyone that was agreeing with your point of view. Most of the time the court of public opinion at least has two sides, but in this case it is just the one.

That doesn't make any sense. No one agreed publically for fear of getting negative trust . i got plenty of pm's though.

I am sure you did

Oh the irony...

[Quickseller]

^ best thread looks like this one.

I am glad that I can be part of bitcointalk.org history

I vote for any of the "I hate VOD" threads.

fuck yeah that guy is a fucking asshole troll. i thought he was cool until he fucking got me

Don't get me wrong, I very much respect and admire VOD. I just think it is funny as to what lengths people go to try to "get back at" VOD for giving them negative trust and ruining their scam attempt.

I strongly support having a special subforum for "I hate VOD" threads

i have no respect for him. he uses the trust system to carry out his vendettas instead of confronting someone like a man. i cannot respect that at all, no matter what logic that faggot tries to use to justify it.

There is nothing to confront. To ask to be confronted doing what you are doing is like asking the police to confront you prior to arresting you when you rob a store at gunpoint in front of the police. There is no question as to what you were trying to do.

If you dislike him so much then create another "I hate VOD" thread so he can disprove your arguments, we have another thread to add to the list and so I can have a smile on my face

ha, excellent faggot logic. here's your prize. i hear its halloween season so i dressed your pumpkin for the occasion.

Well I am glad that you responded to my logical argument with maturity

logical argument? your whole argument is "Vod's right and you're wrong. how can you even question it!"

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Occam's_razor

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Russell%27s_teapot

Well you are wrong. and consequently Vod is right. There were plenty of people that agreed with VOD in the thread you opened in Meta.

Also, out of curiosity, how old are you? What is the longest you have held a job for?

The court of public opinion isn't always right. end discussion. agree to disagree.

The court of public opinion is not always right. I did not see anyone that was agreeing with your point of view. Most of the time the court of public opinion at least has two sides, but in this case it is just the one.

That doesn't make any sense. No one agreed publically for fear of getting negative trust . i got plenty of pm's though.

I am sure you did

Oh the irony...

The adjective you are looking for is sarcasm 

[b!z]

^ best thread looks like this one.

I am glad that I can be part of bitcointalk.org history

I vote for any of the "I hate VOD" threads.

fuck yeah that guy is a fucking asshole troll. i thought he was cool until he fucking got me

Don't get me wrong, I very much respect and admire VOD. I just think it is funny as to what lengths people go to try to "get back at" VOD for giving them negative trust and ruining their scam attempt.

I strongly support having a special subforum for "I hate VOD" threads

i have no respect for him. he uses the trust system to carry out his vendettas instead of confronting someone like a man. i cannot respect that at all, no matter what logic that faggot tries to use to justify it.

There is nothing to confront. To ask to be confronted doing what you are doing is like asking the police to confront you prior to arresting you when you rob a store at gunpoint in front of the police. There is no question as to what you were trying to do.

If you dislike him so much then create another "I hate VOD" thread so he can disprove your arguments, we have another thread to add to the list and so I can have a smile on my face

ha, excellent faggot logic. here's your prize. i hear its halloween season so i dressed your pumpkin for the occasion.

Well I am glad that you responded to my logical argument with maturity

logical argument? your whole argument is "Vod's right and you're wrong. how can you even question it!"

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Occam's_razor

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Russell%27s_teapot

Well you are wrong. and consequently Vod is right. There were plenty of people that agreed with VOD in the thread you opened in Meta.

Also, out of curiosity, how old are you? What is the longest you have held a job for?

The court of public opinion isn't always right. end discussion. agree to disagree.

The court of public opinion is not always right. I did not see anyone that was agreeing with your point of view. Most of the time the court of public opinion at least has two sides, but in this case it is just the one.

That doesn't make any sense. No one agreed publically for fear of getting negative trust . i got plenty of pm's though.

I am sure you did

Oh the irony...

The adjective you are looking for is sarcasm 

Sarcasm is a noun. Sarcastic is an adjective.

[h4xx0r]

 

bitch got told

[Quickseller]

bitch got told

Either way the point still stands

[h4xx0r]

bitch got told

Either way the point still stands

yes, i agree my point stands. I am right, you and everyone else who agrees with Vod is wrong. You have taken some facts, and formulated the opinion that i was trying to do something untrustworthy, and spun it into "he was trying to buy trust, get the pitchforks!!!". i posted you the links to occam's razor and russells teapot. You may wish to disagree, and even proclaim that you are right, but it doesn't make it true. read the link about russells teapot if you still feel like arguing. I already know enough about you to draw my own conclusions, i'm just not arrogant enough to proclaim it as fact. this whole time, i've been mocking you all. me proclaiming you a faggot is the same logical fallacy as you proclaiming me a scammer. did someone mention sarcasm? class dismissed.

[Quickseller]

bitch got told

Either way the point still stands

yes, i agree my point stands. I am right, you and everyone else who agrees with Vod is wrong. You have taken some facts, and formulated the opinion that i was trying to do something untrustworthy, and spun it into "he was trying to buy trust, get the pitchforks!!!". i posted you the links to occam's razor and russells teapot. You may wish to disagree, and even proclaim that you are right, but it doesn't make it true. read the link about russells teapot if you still feel like arguing. I already know enough about you to draw my own conclusions, i'm just not arrogant enough to proclaim it as fact. this whole time, i've been mocking you all. me proclaiming you a faggot is the same logical fallacy as you proclaiming me a scammer. did someone mention sarcasm? class dismissed.

I have no interest in reading your wikipedia posts. Even if they have a good point anyone can edit a wikipedia entry so what it says is not credible.

You also never answered the longest you have held a job for nor have you answered how old you are

[b!z]

bitch got told

Either way the point still stands

yes, i agree my point stands. I am right, you and everyone else who agrees with Vod is wrong. You have taken some facts, and formulated the opinion that i was trying to do something untrustworthy, and spun it into "he was trying to buy trust, get the pitchforks!!!". i posted you the links to occam's razor and russells teapot. You may wish to disagree, and even proclaim that you are right, but it doesn't make it true. read the link about russells teapot if you still feel like arguing. I already know enough about you to draw my own conclusions, i'm just not arrogant enough to proclaim it as fact. this whole time, i've been mocking you all. me proclaiming you a faggot is the same logical fallacy as you proclaiming me a scammer. did someone mention sarcasm? class dismissed.

I have no interest in reading your wikipedia posts. Even if they have a good point anyone can edit a wikipedia entry so what it says is not credible.

You also never answered the longest you have held a job for nor have you answered how old you are

Search for an article from a credible author. Go to the library and pick up a book. Or interview an expert.

Does being able to hold a job longer make your opinion more valid? Sure, it's pretty nice to work and get paid, but it doesn't magically make you right. Same thing goes with age. Experience does come with age, but that doesn't mean older people are always right.

[Quickseller]

bitch got told

Either way the point still stands

yes, i agree my point stands. I am right, you and everyone else who agrees with Vod is wrong. You have taken some facts, and formulated the opinion that i was trying to do something untrustworthy, and spun it into "he was trying to buy trust, get the pitchforks!!!". i posted you the links to occam's razor and russells teapot. You may wish to disagree, and even proclaim that you are right, but it doesn't make it true. read the link about russells teapot if you still feel like arguing. I already know enough about you to draw my own conclusions, i'm just not arrogant enough to proclaim it as fact. this whole time, i've been mocking you all. me proclaiming you a faggot is the same logical fallacy as you proclaiming me a scammer. did someone mention sarcasm? class dismissed.

I have no interest in reading your wikipedia posts. Even if they have a good point anyone can edit a wikipedia entry so what it says is not credible.

You also never answered the longest you have held a job for nor have you answered how old you are

Search for an article from a credible author. Go to the library and pick up a book. Or interview an expert.

Does being able to hold a job longer make your opinion more valid? Sure, it's pretty nice to work and get paid, but it doesn't magically make you right. Same thing goes with age. Experience does come with age, but that doesn't mean older people are always right.

Well my points were that he is very immature. There is a correlation between being younger and immaturity, as with not being able to hold a job and immaturity.

[h4xx0r]

bitch got told

Either way the point still stands

yes, i agree my point stands. I am right, you and everyone else who agrees with Vod is wrong. You have taken some facts, and formulated the opinion that i was trying to do something untrustworthy, and spun it into "he was trying to buy trust, get the pitchforks!!!". i posted you the links to occam's razor and russells teapot. You may wish to disagree, and even proclaim that you are right, but it doesn't make it true. read the link about russells teapot if you still feel like arguing. I already know enough about you to draw my own conclusions, i'm just not arrogant enough to proclaim it as fact. this whole time, i've been mocking you all. me proclaiming you a faggot is the same logical fallacy as you proclaiming me a scammer. did someone mention sarcasm? class dismissed.

I have no interest in reading your wikipedia posts. Even if they have a good point anyone can edit a wikipedia entry so what it says is not credible.

You also never answered the longest you have held a job for nor have you answered how old you are

Russells teapot and occam's razor are pretty famous philosophical arguments. Doesn't make you stupid for never hearing of them. It's not everyone's cup of tea. I don't have to answer your questions but i will. I am an entry level front end engineer. make 24k a year on avg. in my mid 20s. completely self made man. always had a job. even when i didn't, i did whatever it took to made ends meet. mowed yards, scrapped metal, etc.

[b!z]

bitch got told

Either way the point still stands

yes, i agree my point stands. I am right, you and everyone else who agrees with Vod is wrong. You have taken some facts, and formulated the opinion that i was trying to do something untrustworthy, and spun it into "he was trying to buy trust, get the pitchforks!!!". i posted you the links to occam's razor and russells teapot. You may wish to disagree, and even proclaim that you are right, but it doesn't make it true. read the link about russells teapot if you still feel like arguing. I already know enough about you to draw my own conclusions, i'm just not arrogant enough to proclaim it as fact. this whole time, i've been mocking you all. me proclaiming you a faggot is the same logical fallacy as you proclaiming me a scammer. did someone mention sarcasm? class dismissed.

I have no interest in reading your wikipedia posts. Even if they have a good point anyone can edit a wikipedia entry so what it says is not credible.

You also never answered the longest you have held a job for nor have you answered how old you are

Russells teapot and occam's razor are pretty famous philosophical arguments. Doesn't make you stupid for never hearing of them. It's not everyone's cup of tea. I don't have to answer your questions but i will. I am an entry level front end engineer. make 24k a year on avg. in my mid 20s. completely self made man. always had a job. even when i didn't, i did whatever it took to made ends meet. mowed yards, scrapped metal, etc.

Just curious, what sites have you worked on if you don't mind sharing?

[h4xx0r]

bitch got told

Either way the point still stands

yes, i agree my point stands. I am right, you and everyone else who agrees with Vod is wrong. You have taken some facts, and formulated the opinion that i was trying to do something untrustworthy, and spun it into "he was trying to buy trust, get the pitchforks!!!". i posted you the links to occam's razor and russells teapot. You may wish to disagree, and even proclaim that you are right, but it doesn't make it true. read the link about russells teapot if you still feel like arguing. I already know enough about you to draw my own conclusions, i'm just not arrogant enough to proclaim it as fact. this whole time, i've been mocking you all. me proclaiming you a faggot is the same logical fallacy as you proclaiming me a scammer. did someone mention sarcasm? class dismissed.

I have no interest in reading your wikipedia posts. Even if they have a good point anyone can edit a wikipedia entry so what it says is not credible.

You also never answered the longest you have held a job for nor have you answered how old you are

Search for an article from a credible author. Go to the library and pick up a book. Or interview an expert.

Does being able to hold a job longer make your opinion more valid? Sure, it's pretty nice to work and get paid, but it doesn't magically make you right. Same thing goes with age. Experience does come with age, but that doesn't mean older people are always right.

Well my points were that he is very immature. There is a correlation between being younger and immaturity, as with not being able to hold a job and immaturity.

there is also a difference between being immature and being frustrated at being blackballed by complete strangers on the internet.

[Quickseller]

bitch got told

Either way the point still stands

yes, i agree my point stands. I am right, you and everyone else who agrees with Vod is wrong. You have taken some facts, and formulated the opinion that i was trying to do something untrustworthy, and spun it into "he was trying to buy trust, get the pitchforks!!!". i posted you the links to occam's razor and russells teapot. You may wish to disagree, and even proclaim that you are right, but it doesn't make it true. read the link about russells teapot if you still feel like arguing. I already know enough about you to draw my own conclusions, i'm just not arrogant enough to proclaim it as fact. this whole time, i've been mocking you all. me proclaiming you a faggot is the same logical fallacy as you proclaiming me a scammer. did someone mention sarcasm? class dismissed.

I have no interest in reading your wikipedia posts. Even if they have a good point anyone can edit a wikipedia entry so what it says is not credible.

You also never answered the longest you have held a job for nor have you answered how old you are

Russells teapot and occam's razor are pretty famous philosophical arguments. Doesn't make you stupid for never hearing of them. It's not everyone's cup of tea. I don't have to answer your questions but i will. I am an entry level front end engineer. make 24k a year on avg. in my mid 20s. completely self made man. always had a job. even when i didn't, i did whatever it took to made ends meet. mowed yards, scrapped metal, etc.

Interesting. What is the longest you have stayed at a single company? How long do you stay at a company on average?

[b!z]

bitch got told

Either way the point still stands

yes, i agree my point stands. I am right, you and everyone else who agrees with Vod is wrong. You have taken some facts, and formulated the opinion that i was trying to do something untrustworthy, and spun it into "he was trying to buy trust, get the pitchforks!!!". i posted you the links to occam's razor and russells teapot. You may wish to disagree, and even proclaim that you are right, but it doesn't make it true. read the link about russells teapot if you still feel like arguing. I already know enough about you to draw my own conclusions, i'm just not arrogant enough to proclaim it as fact. this whole time, i've been mocking you all. me proclaiming you a faggot is the same logical fallacy as you proclaiming me a scammer. did someone mention sarcasm? class dismissed.

I have no interest in reading your wikipedia posts. Even if they have a good point anyone can edit a wikipedia entry so what it says is not credible.

You also never answered the longest you have held a job for nor have you answered how old you are

Russells teapot and occam's razor are pretty famous philosophical arguments. Doesn't make you stupid for never hearing of them. It's not everyone's cup of tea. I don't have to answer your questions but i will. I am an entry level front end engineer. make 24k a year on avg. in my mid 20s. completely self made man. always had a job. even when i didn't, i did whatever it took to made ends meet. mowed yards, scrapped metal, etc.

Interesting. What is the longest you have stayed at a single company? How long do you stay at a company on average?

Again, what does this have to do with anything? I'm not taking any sides; I just think your reasoning is off.

[Quickseller]

bitch got told

Either way the point still stands

yes, i agree my point stands. I am right, you and everyone else who agrees with Vod is wrong. You have taken some facts, and formulated the opinion that i was trying to do something untrustworthy, and spun it into "he was trying to buy trust, get the pitchforks!!!". i posted you the links to occam's razor and russells teapot. You may wish to disagree, and even proclaim that you are right, but it doesn't make it true. read the link about russells teapot if you still feel like arguing. I already know enough about you to draw my own conclusions, i'm just not arrogant enough to proclaim it as fact. this whole time, i've been mocking you all. me proclaiming you a faggot is the same logical fallacy as you proclaiming me a scammer. did someone mention sarcasm? class dismissed.

I have no interest in reading your wikipedia posts. Even if they have a good point anyone can edit a wikipedia entry so what it says is not credible.

You also never answered the longest you have held a job for nor have you answered how old you are

Russells teapot and occam's razor are pretty famous philosophical arguments. Doesn't make you stupid for never hearing of them. It's not everyone's cup of tea. I don't have to answer your questions but i will. I am an entry level front end engineer. make 24k a year on avg. in my mid 20s. completely self made man. always had a job. even when i didn't, i did whatever it took to made ends meet. mowed yards, scrapped metal, etc.

Interesting. What is the longest you have stayed at a single company? How long do you stay at a company on average?

Again, what does this have to do with anything? I'm not taking any sides; I just think your reasoning is off.

These correlate with maturity levels. People who are immature tend to not get along with their coworkers and superiors (and lash out as he does) and end up either quitting in rage or getting fired