Bitcoin Forum
May 09, 2024, 05:54:10 AM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 27.0 [Torrent]
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  
Pages: [1]
  Print  
Author Topic: CGMiner - multipool or not?  (Read 4091 times)
UpsyDaisy (OP)
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 20
Merit: 0



View Profile
May 15, 2012, 07:00:02 AM
 #1

I am using cgminer to mine with my BFL bitForce single. Until now i have used one pool and generated about 0.5 BTC per day.

I now started using the CGMiner multipool option with the load-balance strategy.

Before i waste few days to test the new configuration, can anyone tell from his own experience or knowledge if that strategy (Multipool) is better or not in terms of BTC produced per day/month?

Thank You all!
1715234050
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1715234050

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1715234050
Reply with quote  #2

1715234050
Report to moderator
1715234050
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1715234050

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1715234050
Reply with quote  #2

1715234050
Report to moderator
"There should not be any signed int. If you've found a signed int somewhere, please tell me (within the next 25 years please) and I'll change it to unsigned int." -- Satoshi
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction.
rjk
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 448
Merit: 250


1ngldh


View Profile
May 15, 2012, 03:17:58 PM
 #2

Meni Rosenfeld did a writeup on how you could balance your hash across pools and reduce your variance. But I'm not sure I would bother with only 1 Single. You should of course have failover pools, so that if the main one goes down you can back up to a secondary or tertiary server.

Mining Rig Extraordinaire - the Trenton BPX6806 18-slot PCIe backplane [PICS] Dead project is dead, all hail the coming of the mighty ASIC!
Pages: [1]
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!