Feathercoin 0.8.7.0 Released - The NeoScrypt Update - Hardfork block 432,000

[Oscilson]

What kind of hash is everyone pulling? Here's some of my baseline results so far on standard +~10% OC

13.12 catalyst drivers:
r9 280x - Ubuntu 14.04: 53kh
r9 280x - Windows 7.1: 48kh
r9 270x - Windows 7.1: ~28kh

nvidia 240 drivers:
gf 660ti - Windows 7.1: 22kh

Edit: Lower the worksize, it seems to help a large amount, 16-32 seems to be right
r9 280x - Ubuntu 14.04: 78kh
r9 280x - Windows 7.1: 76kh
r9 270x - Windows 7.1: 41kh
gf 660ti - Windows 7.1: 26kh worksize 16 can't go lower =[

My 660ti reports only ~80% "power consumption" at OC so it runs pretty cool and is proportionate in hash to the other cards (the way it looks like it should be anyhow).  i.e. in x11 it would read like ~105%.

Is it profitable to mine and sell with your power consumption and electricity price?

[tryphe]

Is it profitable to mine and sell with your power consumption and electricity price?

Hard to say for sure. I don't have a device similar to Kill-a-watt to measure the pull from the wall. The Nvidia GPU monitor reports about 25% less "power consumption" depending on how I OC, but I have no idea what could possibly be measuring.  My guess would be core voltage.

My core temps are much less (like 10C average for me), however radiant heat seems to be the same.

[Namsbreh]

6x 750ti drawing 330w at the wall.

[Conqueror]

Anyone tried sending FTC from coinotron to BTC-e? It stated that the payout has been sent but the i've checked the block explorer at that address there is no new transaction at all..
What went wrong here?

Details? Transaction ID?

Edit: saw my transaction show up on blockchain just now after 15 hours.. so just need to wait for btc-e to reply why it doesn't get credited to my account yet..
Anyway, i'm still confused why it took more than 15 hours for explorer.feathercoin.com to show the latest transaction.

Btce was doing maintanence of wallets.

BTC-E should be ok now:
https://twitter.com/btcecom/status/527045266021814272

[Vasilis]

14.9 drivers but 3.7.5 work fine.

only HW errors

2x Gigabyte Radeon R9 280X 3GB GDDR5 (Windforce x3) OC GURU II
2x Sapphire Radeon R9 280X 3GB GDDR5 Vapor-X
same here but.....76kh/s : cgminer.exe --neoscrypt -I 13 --worksize 24 -g 1
in cgminer.conf change : "intensity" : "13", "worksize" : "24", and add : "gpu-fan" : "0-80",

only HW errors/ (change tc 16380-24000)
(7970 7950)

copy
amd_opencl32.dll  amdocl.dll
hw=0
drivers 14.6, 14.9
http://i.piccy.info/i9/acee32262718bfc041294661be9a29b1/1414500033/6476/820261/hw0_240.jpghttp://i.piccy.info/a3/2014-10-28-12-40/i9-7191841/240x139-r/i.gif

[gabrielknight]

6x 750ti drawing 330w at the wall.

That's nice. Is that a complete system draw? including motherboard and stuff?
Anyway, just curious, what's the hashrate of that six 750ti drawing 330w from wall?
Thanks.

[Namsbreh]

6x 750ti drawing 330w at the wall.

That's nice. Is that a complete system draw? including motherboard and stuff?
Anyway, just curious, what's the hashrate of that six 750ti drawing 330w from wall?
Thanks.

Whole headless system with intel dual core cpu, old sata HDD.

Been running at 250kh/s for past 35 hours.

[lobo13hf]

Can anybody share the .bin file for amd from 13.1 to 14.9?


any working pool whit GPUs?

[anatolikostis]

"cat.13.12 pregen. *.bins ----> win7 x64 cat.14.9.1"-hook
it seems that works fine for  me:

7970 @1080/1500                  ---> hashes ~99kh/s
290(hynix) @1050/1375          ---> hashes ~122kh/s
290x/290(elpida) @1050/1375  ---> hashes ~115kh/s

1375---->1500MHz MemOC are useless for 290/290x - speed is the same as @1375MHz

[vizay]

Just curious, where can I find a market for vendors that accept Feathercoin?  I'm not looking to exchange for bitcoin, litecoin, etc, just for vendor selling items to accept them.  I have some that I would like to spend on something productive.

Sorry for the somewhat slow answer, guess people in here are so excited about tweaking their gfx-cards again

https://www.feathercoin.com/merchants-who-accept-ftc/

Prego!

[Oscilson]

Good to see FTC is used.

[ntz]

use http://yaamp.com as a pool

[Atomicat]

My 7950 was getting 64 Kh/s @ 1150/1500, workload 48 and intensity 14.  Then I got a few hardware errors and dropped intensity to 13.  Hashrate bounced up to 77 Kh/s!  Great!  Oh, CGMiner 3.7.5.

+19 Kh/s from the cpuminer and I'm feeling ok.

[Conqueror]

Did I just saw this in FTC team chat? 

[psychofractor]

So, what's this, then? 

 [2014-11-01 12:00:21] Error -11: Building Program (clBuildProgram)
 [2014-11-01 12:00:21] "C:\Users\admin\AppData\Local\Temp\OCL4744T8.cl", line 64
7: error: identifier
          "WORKGROUPSIZE" is undefined
  __attribute__((reqd_work_group_size(WORKGROUPSIZE, 1, 1)))

Win 7, Catalyst 14.4, R9 270, cgminer 3.7.7b

[Conqueror]

What kind of hash is everyone pulling? Here's some of my baseline results so far on standard +~10% OC

13.12 catalyst drivers:
r9 280x - Ubuntu 14.04: 53kh
r9 280x - Windows 7.1: 48kh
r9 270x - Windows 7.1: ~28kh

nvidia 240 drivers:
gf 660ti - Windows 7.1: 22kh

Edit: Lower the worksize, it seems to help a large amount, 16-32 seems to be right
r9 280x - Ubuntu 14.04: 78kh
r9 280x - Windows 7.1: 76kh
r9 270x - Windows 7.1: 41kh
gf 660ti - Windows 7.1: 26kh worksize 16 can't go lower =[

My 660ti reports only ~80% "power consumption" at OC so it runs pretty cool and is proportionate in hash to the other cards (the way it looks like it should be anyhow).  i.e. in x11 it would read like ~105%.

13.12 drivers (used 13.12 to generate the bin as well): 107kh/s on 7950 @ 1000/1250 with some kernel edits.
IIRC, my 280X on 14.9 (used 14.9 to generate bin, too) did somewhere around 160kh/s @ 1140/1500.

Hi Wolf0, don't you want to join FTC devs Skype group?
Seem like you did some fine work on miner!

[Hippie Tech]

What kind of hash is everyone pulling? Here's some of my baseline results so far on standard +~10% OC

13.12 catalyst drivers:
r9 280x - Ubuntu 14.04: 53kh
r9 280x - Windows 7.1: 48kh
r9 270x - Windows 7.1: ~28kh

nvidia 240 drivers:
gf 660ti - Windows 7.1: 22kh

Edit: Lower the worksize, it seems to help a large amount, 16-32 seems to be right
r9 280x - Ubuntu 14.04: 78kh
r9 280x - Windows 7.1: 76kh
r9 270x - Windows 7.1: 41kh
gf 660ti - Windows 7.1: 26kh worksize 16 can't go lower =[

My 660ti reports only ~80% "power consumption" at OC so it runs pretty cool and is proportionate in hash to the other cards (the way it looks like it should be anyhow).  i.e. in x11 it would read like ~105%.

13.12 drivers (used 13.12 to generate the bin as well): 107kh/s on 7950 @ 1000/1250 with some kernel edits.
IIRC, my 280X on 14.9 (used 14.9 to generate bin, too) did somewhere around 160kh/s @ 1140/1500.

Oops, was wrong about the 280X. On 14.9, I have a 290X and a 280X, 290X does 200kh/s at stock clocks, 280X does around 175kh/s.

Screenshot (nsfw): https://ottrbutt.com/miner/neoscryptwolf-11012014.png
Also has settings there.

Your link 2 flags..
https://www.virustotal.com/en/url/a173bb61fbb94e46e4e1e8ab06a1ac98c6c323d1f77ba3d3db6d4d7715d22c87/analysis/1414857527/

... and has been blacklisted ..
http://quttera.com/detailed_report/ottrbutt.com

[Hippie Tech]

Anyhoo..

My 280x/hynix is pulling 128 khash with cgminer 3.3.7b and the following settings :
gpu/mem - 1120/1500, win7 x64 cat 14.9 w/ sdk, -I 13, -w 32, -g 2 -g 1

Screenie shows the 280x and 7870 at stock, same settings except -g 1 was used.


edit

both examples used -g 1

[lobo13hf]

Anyhoo..

My 280x/hynix is pulling 128 khash with cgminer 3.3.7b and the following settings :
gpu/mem - 1120/1500, win7 x64 cat 14.9 w/ sdk, -I 13, -w 32, -g 2

Screenie shows the 280x and 7870 at stock, same settings except -g 1 was used.

where u got that cgminer 3.3.7b from i have 3.7.7 cant find cgminer 3.3.7b?...

[Number6]

What kind of hash is everyone pulling? Here's some of my baseline results so far on standard +~10% OC

13.12 catalyst drivers:
r9 280x - Ubuntu 14.04: 53kh
r9 280x - Windows 7.1: 48kh
r9 270x - Windows 7.1: ~28kh

nvidia 240 drivers:
gf 660ti - Windows 7.1: 22kh

Edit: Lower the worksize, it seems to help a large amount, 16-32 seems to be right
r9 280x - Ubuntu 14.04: 78kh
r9 280x - Windows 7.1: 76kh
r9 270x - Windows 7.1: 41kh
gf 660ti - Windows 7.1: 26kh worksize 16 can't go lower =[

My 660ti reports only ~80% "power consumption" at OC so it runs pretty cool and is proportionate in hash to the other cards (the way it looks like it should be anyhow).  i.e. in x11 it would read like ~105%.

Using BAMT version 1.6.0 and installing the latest version of neo-gpuminer (3.7.7c), I am getting around 54.4 kh per card on a rig with 5x R9 270x's, for a total of 274kh on average. Power draw for the whole rig as configured is 440 watts from the wall, measured via kill-a-watt.

My relevant configuration settings are as follows:

intensity 13
worksize 32
gpu-engine 1025
gpu-memclock 1250
gpu-threads 2

I found that dropping the intensity down from 14 to 13 seemed to give me the best speeds with the above settings. I also found that pushing the gpu and memory clocks higher did not seem to give much more in the way of increased hashrate, but it did increase the power draw. This seems inline with my experiences when I ran these rigs with scrypt mining.

I am still playing around and hope to eek out a few more khash without upping the power draw.

I also been playing with some rigs with 3x R9 280's, but while the total khash per rig is close (240 khash) my power draw from the wall is 550 watts. I have only managed to get around 80 khash per card with these, so unless I can do better I will turn them off as the breakeven is too close right now.

I like to think of things in how much I am earning after costs, thus I am getting roughly .62 kh per watt with the 270's and only about .44 kh per watt with the 280's. As I said, with current rates the 270's are profitable for me (no free electricity) but the 280's are costing money to run at their current output.

Looking for any other helpful settings to change this around, as it would be nice to put some of the cards I have laying around back into profitable use...