ToTheMoon.is -- Moneypot in space

[Shogen]

To be honest, the graphics is a lot better than the original Moneypot.

What you need to do now is listen to dooglus' advice to add the mega link on your site (probably in FAQ), get rid of doog's negative feedback and advertise your site everywhere.

[Tothemoonguy]

We finally had some big winners, Player Newportz withdrew 3 BTC yesterday night, congrats!

http://tothemoon.is/user/Newportz

[BAGOBO]

We finally had some big winners, Player Newportz withdrew 3 BTC yesterday night, congrats!

http://tothemoon.is/user/Newportz

and the first, you will see big win

just wait for the ending...

[unamis76]

The website looks good, and the code is out... Things are looking good!

[bitkate]

Same like moneypot,but this game have a good graphic

[Tothemoonguy]

The modified version must prominently offer its source code to all users interacting with it. Not all users reading a particular thread on a particular forum.

I'm willing to believe he didn't understand the license he was agreeing to. But now that it has been brought to his attention, that's not really an excuse for continuing to fail to comply with it.

Hey dooglus i want to say I am putting it in the faq in next deploy like you say

[Tothemoonguy]

We had another big winner; BBmoonBB

http://tothemoon.is/user/BBmoonBB won around 11 BTC today, nice work!

He also is now rank 1 on our leaderboard http://tothemoon.is/leaderboard

[elm]

We had another big winner; BBmoonBB

http://tothemoon.is/user/BBmoonBB won around 11 BTC today, nice work!

He also is now rank 1 on our leaderboard http://tothemoon.is/leaderboard

gross profit looks nice but doesnt give the real picture

[csmcanarney]

Passwords are still being sent in the clear and there is still no link to the source code on the site.

[elm]

gross profit looks nice but doesnt give the real picture

The next time they pull from moneypot.com, they'll get the improved leaderboard which shows net profit, as well as allowing sorting: https://www.moneypot.com/leaderboard

yes thats much better but to be frank a winner only leader board would be nicer IMO. I would not like people to see my losses

just my 2 satoshis

[BBmmBB]

We had another big winner; BBmoonBB

http://tothemoon.is/user/BBmoonBB won around 11 BTC today, nice work!

He also is now rank 1 on our leaderboard http://tothemoon.is/leaderboard

aka AKCOINMINER aka JOEMATTIE aka known shill !    *now we know who helped scam the bitcoin community!

[BBmmBB]

We had another big winner; BBmoonBB

http://tothemoon.is/user/BBmoonBB won around 11 BTC today, nice work!

He also is now rank 1 on our leaderboard http://tothemoon.is/leaderboard

gross profit looks nice but doesnt give the real picture

it's the same guy who helped steal the coins on dice.ninja!   :\   now he's using BBmoonBB ..are you for real?

[Tothemoonguy]

I saw the Mega link in this thread, but not on his site.

I just deployed and put it in faq http://tothemoon.is/faq

[Tothemoonguy]

Btw, thank you everyone for trying tothemoon! At the moment already 763.26540600 BTC have been wagered. So far we payout around 40 BTC to winners which is really nice for them.

[BBmmBB]

Btw, thank you everyone for trying tothemoon! At the moment already 763.26540600 BTC have been wagered. So far we payout around 40 BTC to winners which is really nice for them.

it's a scam    fake volume via JoeMattie

[dooglus]

I saw the Mega link in this thread, but not on his site.

I just deployed and put it in faq http://tothemoon.is/faq

You put it under the "investing" section when it is nothing to do with investing.
It isn't clickable.
It appears split over two lines.

Would you say this was prominently displayed? It's as if you are going out of your way to make it difficult for people to find it.

Finally, the file at the URL you give doesn't match what is live on the site. You are meant to provide source for the current version, not an old version.

your modified version must prominently offer all users interacting with it remotely through a computer network (if your version supports such interaction) an opportunity to receive the Corresponding Source of your version

Is there some reason you won't just comply with the license?

[Tothemoonguy]

You put it under the "investing" section when it is nothing to do with investing.
It isn't clickable.
It appears split over two lines.

Would you say this was prominently displayed? It's as if you are going out of your way to make it difficult for people to find it.

Finally, the file at the URL you give doesn't match what is live on the site. You are meant to provide source for the current version, not an old version.

Is there some reason you won't just comply with the license?

It's under investing by accident i just put it at the bottom.
I will make it clickable and i will add the patch where I added the license in the FAQ to the download.

You are a hard ass you know that

[dooglus]

It's under investing by accident i just put it at the bottom.
I will make it clickable and i will add the patch where I added the license in the FAQ to the download.

You are a hard ass you know that

You are attempting to profit from the use of someone else's code that they generously shared with you on the condition that you share your modifications with others.

You haven't been following the conditions that you agreed to by using that code.

I'm just asking that you do so.

It could be considered to be a dick move by me to hold a negative trust rating of you over your head to encourage you to comply, but Eric (the code's author) tried asking you nicely and that didn't work.

[My Name Was Taken]

It's under investing by accident i just put it at the bottom.
I will make it clickable and i will add the patch where I added the license in the FAQ to the download.

You are a hard ass you know that

You are attempting to profit from the use of someone else's code that they generously shared with you on the condition that you share your modifications with others.

You haven't been following the conditions that you agreed to by using that code.

I'm just asking that you do so.

It could be considered to be a dick move by me to hold a negative trust rating of you over your head to encourage you to comply, but Eric (the code's author) tried asking you nicely and that didn't work.

I like that someone is holding his feet to the fire to comply with the license, but why isn't Eric the one doing so? Does he not care enough to pursue it or has he asked you to do it?

Also, it seems if you (moonguy) are going to just take someone's code, complying with the license should be a pretty simple task. You're trying to profit off someone else's work, and he seems he's pretty OK with that, considering he did all the work. The concept and the code is not yours, you made some superficial changes to the look, and now you're making money on it. It's just decent to comply with the license that made it all possible.

[dooglus]

I like that someone is holding his feet to the fire to comply with the license, but why isn't Eric the one doing so? Does he not care enough to pursue it or has he asked you to do it?

He didn't ask me to do it, although he did tell me that the moon guy was being a dick about complying with the license. Then I saw the post here where he was saying he would "consider" doing what's right, and decided to encourage him to do so. For some reason that I don't fully understand, when I leave negative feedback for people they get a red mark next to all their posts. That isn't the case for most people, so I do have somewhat of an unfair advantage.