Mathematical proof of god

[Dark_Vader]

Here i have the mathematical proof:

88
8 x 8 = 64
(6 / 3) + (4 / 3) = 3.333 rounded to 3
HALF LIFE 3 CONFIRMED!

 

[Buffer Overflow]

Here i have the mathematical proof:

88
8 x 8 = 64
(6 / 3) + (4 / 3) = 3.333 rounded to 3
HALF LIFE 3 CONFIRMED!

 

Nonsense here is the proof:

d4nk = gr33dy sc4mm3r

[Dark_Vader]

Here i have the mathematical proof:

88
8 x 8 = 64
(6 / 3) + (4 / 3) = 3.333 rounded to 3
HALF LIFE 3 CONFIRMED!

 

Nonsense here is the proof:

d4nk = gr33dy sc4mm3r

Give this man a cookie! 

[Buffer Overflow]

Here i have the mathematical proof:

88
8 x 8 = 64
(6 / 3) + (4 / 3) = 3.333 rounded to 3
HALF LIFE 3 CONFIRMED!

 

Nonsense here is the proof:

d4nk = gr33dy sc4mm3r

Give this man a cookie! 

[Vod]

so dank, would you say that you consider yourself enlightened?

Almost.  Am very close.

so dank, you don't need a soul to become enlightened?  Anyone can do as easily as they can experience egodeath?

[nsimmons]

This thread is boring!

Can we have some actual math discussion? I love how dank referred to some set builder notation as "jargon", and then spews nothing but.

Proofs from Aquinas before algebra existed don't count.

More math!

[Buffer Overflow]

Can we have some actual math discussion? I love how dank referred to some set builder notation as "jargon", and then spews nothing but.

If your looking for an interesting educational discussion, choosing a "dank thread" was a poor choice.

[nsimmons]

Can we have some actual math discussion? I love how dank referred to some set builder notation as "jargon", and then spews nothing but.

If your looking for an interesting educational discussion, choosing a "dank thread" was a poor choice.

HAHA

[bl4kjaguar]

If you want to crucify dank, fine.

Let he who is without blame hammer the first nail.

Who is ready to equate themselves with the Lord that only sees perfection? How will you ever balance such an equation when you do not practice forgiveness?

Dank rebels against your greed.

HOW CAN BITCOIN HEAL A SICKENED WORLD IF BITCOINERS DO NOT DIAGNOSE THE ILLNESS?

The root of all evil is the love of money.

[nsimmons]

If you want to crucify dank, fine.

Let he who is without blame hammer the first nail.

Who is ready to equate themselves with the Lord that only sees perfection? How will you ever balance such an equation when you do not practice forgiveness?

Dank rebels against your greed.

HOW CAN BITCOIN HEAL A SICKENED WORLD IF BITCOINERS DO NOT DIAGNOSE THE ILLNESS?

The root of all evil is the love of money.

No math  you fail as well.

[bl4kjaguar]

No math   you fail as well.

Get on your feet; it's time to do some math!

Quotes from a brilliant mathematician, and related:

This blindness (or prejudice, or whatever you may call it) of logicians is indeed surprising. But I think the explanation is not hard to find. It lies in a widespread lack, at that time, of the required epistemological attitude toward metamathematics and toward non-finitary reasoning. …

[M]y objectivistic conception of mathematics and metamathematics in general, and of transfinite reasoning in particular, was fundamental also to my other work in logic.

How indeed could one think of expressing metamathematics in the mathematical systems themselves, if the latter are considered to consist of meaningless symbols which acquire some substitute of meaning only through metamathematics? [emphasis his] [8–9]

How can one expect to solve mathematical problems by mere analysis of the concepts occurring, if our analysis so far does not even suffice to set up the axioms? [110]

What I call the theological worldview is the idea that the world and everything in it has meaning and reason, and in particular a good and indubitable meaning. It follows immediately that our worldly existence, since it has in itself at most a very dubious meaning, can only be means to the end of another existence. The idea that everything in the world has a meaning [reason] is an exact analogue of the principle that everything has a cause, on which rests all of science. [217]

http://kevincarmody.com/math/goedel.html

[bl4kjaguar]

How can one expect to solve mathematical problems by mere analysis of the concepts occurring, if our analysis so far does not even suffice to set up the axioms? [110]

HOW CAN BITCOIN HEAL A SICKENED WORLD IF BITCOINERS DO NOT DIAGNOSE THE ILLNESS?

Ponder it, if you dare.

[Rayban34]

I suck at Maths.

I think God is very anthropomorphic in the sense that he hates, gives, loves, destroys, creates and so on. I've heard countless arguments from solid believers that we cannot attribute his traits to the way in which we think because he survives on a higher plane. Yet, in the same breath he floods the world because he feels his creations have become bitter and twisted. K, seems very human-like to me.

[Buffer Overflow]

Dank rebels against your greed.

Ever heard of the blind leading the blind?

HOW CAN BITCOIN HEAL A SICKENED WORLD IF BITCOINERS DO NOT DIAGNOSE THE ILLNESS?

I've never been under any illusions from day 1 that bitcoin will cure a sickened world. It's another tool that will be used for both good and bad.

The root of all evil is the love of money.

If someone was murdered from the motivation of jealousy, how was that evil event related to finance?

[bl4kjaguar]

If your looking for an interesting educational discussion, choosing a "dank thread" was a poor choice.

Was it?

It's a matter of your perspective and your participation.

Embrace love dank, let go of your hate. The universe is increasing it's vibration frequency, due to your inner unbalance. Love.

Suggest to educate self about forgiveness, and reach that high frequency yourself first.

[Buffer Overflow]

If your looking for an interesting educational discussion, choosing a "dank thread" was a poor choice.

Was it?

It's a matter of your perspective and your participation.

Well generally what happens in a "dank thread" is he tells everyone his views, then if anyone disagrees with him, he replys with something completely unrelated or just simple dismisses and ignores it. That's why they always end up as "The Dank Show", purely for entertainment purposes.

Embrace love dank, let go of your hate. The universe is increasing it's vibration frequency, due to your inner unbalance. Love.

Suggest to educate self about forgiveness, and reach that high frequency yourself first.

I was actually just playing dank at his own silly games of just replying to a question with something completely unrelated. His favourite game.

Suggest to educate self about forgiveness, and reach that high frequency yourself first.

God requires repentance and so must we. Dank shows none.
Suggest you educate yourself about dank.

Edit: In my life experience, handing out any unearned forgiveness too easily and others will just walk all over you. Others (including myself) should correct their wrongdoing with high priority order of precedence, or they are not genuine.

[nsimmons]

No math   you fail as well.

Get on your feet; it's time to do some math!

Quotes from a brilliant mathematician, and related:

This blindness (or prejudice, or whatever you may call it) of logicians is indeed surprising. But I think the explanation is not hard to find. It lies in a widespread lack, at that time, of the required epistemological attitude toward metamathematics and toward non-finitary reasoning. …

[M]y objectivistic conception of mathematics and metamathematics in general, and of transfinite reasoning in particular, was fundamental also to my other work in logic.

How indeed could one think of expressing metamathematics in the mathematical systems themselves, if the latter are considered to consist of meaningless symbols which acquire some substitute of meaning only through metamathematics? [emphasis his] [8–9]

How can one expect to solve mathematical problems by mere analysis of the concepts occurring, if our analysis so far does not even suffice to set up the axioms? [110]

What I call the theological worldview is the idea that the world and everything in it has meaning and reason, and in particular a good and indubitable meaning. It follows immediately that our worldly existence, since it has in itself at most a very dubious meaning, can only be means to the end of another existence. The idea that everything in the world has a meaning [reason] is an exact analogue of the principle that everything has a cause, on which rests all of science. [217]

http://kevincarmody.com/math/goedel.html

I don't see a single equation, axiom, definition, or proof in this quote or the website linked.

Philosophy as an exact theory should do for metaphysics as much as Newton did for physics. I think it is perfectly possible that the development of such a philosophical theory will take place within the next hundred years or even sooner [7.3.6; portion misquoted, corrected p. 288, 332]

Newtonian physics is wrong, this quote has turned out to be wrong.

I don’t think the brain came in the Darwinian manner. In fact, it is disprovable. Simple mechanism can’t yield the brain. I think the basic elements of the universe are simple. Life force is a primitive element of the universe and it obeys certain laws of action. These laws are not simple, and they are not mechanical. [6.2.12]

Most of his musings have turned out to be false with the passage of time and advancement in the physical sciences.

Here is one the OP should take to heart.

Intuition is not proof; it is the opposite of proof. We do not analyze intuition to see a proof but by intuition we see something without a proof. [9.2.46]

And again, this page has no math whatsoever. Quotes from a mathematician, who was wrong about a great many predictions, are not math.

[BADecker]

Huh? The mathematical proof of God is the math that predicted the Higgs Boson. Now that we have found this elusive, little particle, just ask Steven Hawking what he calls it. The God particle. It'll be an interesting day if they ever find two of them at the same time. There probably is only ONE in the whole universe.

[bl4kjaguar]

I will quote some math from that page; below are some axioms, both mathematical and philosophical.

Please say nice things or ask good questions; otherwise you Let the crucifixion of the messengers cointinue.

[K]nowledge that is not your own is dangerous, more dangerous than ignorance, because it is a hidden ignorance, and you will not be able to see that you are deceiving yourself. You are carrying false coins and thinking that you are a rich man. Sooner or later your poverty will be revealed. Then you will be shocked.

I never suspect for a single moment their good intentions. Whatever these people are doing, they are doing with good intentions; but the questions is not of good intentions, the question is: What is the result?
"You may murder me with good intentions, but your good intentions cannot justify my murder.

They have no awareness of a different dimension of knowing, so whatever they are doing is done in deep sleep."

First: knowledge is borrowed, realise this. The very realisation becomes a dropping of it.... Learning means being responsive to whatsoever is around you.... This is a great learning, but not knowledge.

Become the truth
There is no way to find truth — except through finding it. There is simply no way unless you are without any mind within you — because mind is like a breeze, continuously flowing, and the flame goes on wavering. When mind is not there, the breeze stops, and the flame becomes unmoving. When your consciousness is an unmoving flame, you know the truth. You have to learn how not to follow the mind.

Nobody can give you the truth, nobody, not even a Buddha, a Jesus, a Krishna.... It is beautiful that truth is not transferable in any way. Unless you reach it, you cannot reach. Unless you become it, you never have it.

"A set is a unity of which its elements are the constituents. It is a fundamental property of the mind to comprehend multitudes into unities. Sets are multitudes which are also unities. A multitude is the opposite of a unity. How can anything be both a multitude and a unity? Yet a set is just that. It is a seemingly contradictory fact that sets exist."

"To arrive at the totality of integers involves a jump. Overviewing it presupposes an infinite intuition. What is given is a psychological analysis. The point is whether it produces objective conviction."

"We do not analyze intuition to see a proof but by intuition we see something without a proof."

"Reason and understanding concern two levels of concept. Dialectics and feelings are involved in reason."

[Mewtwo]

I really don't know why I read this whole thread.