remotemass (OP)
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1120
Merit: 1017
ASMR El Salvador
|
|
October 17, 2014, 06:43:42 AM |
|
Bitcoins are not tokens. The ledger - with replica in every node of the network - only manages transactions that take place between the public locker we call public address from which we keep a secret code we call private key. As the values associated with a public address get to be associated with other bitcoin addresses we can keep track of these amounts as if they are tokens but actually they are not kept anywhere. Only private keys are kept. They allow you to spend the bitcoins that entered circulation given as reward payments to those who secure the network validating and processing transactions. Knowing the private key you can compute its public address in fractions of a second but the reverse - computing the private key knowing only the public key - is not possible as it would take countless years and would have to be done by an incredible imense amount of trial and error.
|
{ Imagine a sequence of bits generated from the first decimal place of the square roots of whole integers that are irrational numbers. If the decimal falls between 0 and 5, it's considered bit 0, and if it falls between 5 and 10, it's considered bit 1. This sequence from a simple integer count of contiguous irrationals and their logical decimal expansion of the first decimal place is called the 'main irrational stream.' Our goal is to design a physical and optical computing system system that can detect when this stream starts matching a specific pattern of a given size of bits. bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=166760.0 } Satoshi did use a friend class in C++ and put a comment on the code saying: "This is why people hate C++".
|
|
|
gadman2
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 977
Merit: 1000
|
|
October 17, 2014, 10:49:22 AM |
|
Yeah it's not a coin either. The name should be the least of your worries.
|
|
|
|
franky1
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 4298
Merit: 4626
|
|
October 17, 2014, 10:59:59 AM |
|
bitcoins are not coins, but a token is a better term. remember a token is not like a casino chip (round piece of plastic) or a supermarket coupon (piece of paper) a token has more meaning then that. google 'session token' for instance .. screw it ill spell it out for yousession token is a piece of data that is used in network communications (often over HTTP) to identify a session, a series of related message exchanges. so bitcoins are closer to being described as a token rather than a coin
|
I DO NOT TRADE OR ACT AS ESCROW ON THIS FORUM EVER. Please do your own research & respect what is written here as both opinion & information gleaned from experience. many people replying with insults but no on-topic content substance, automatically are 'facepalmed' and yawned at
|
|
|
azguard
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1484
Merit: 1001
Crypto-News.net: News from Crypto World
|
|
October 17, 2014, 11:23:48 AM |
|
In both cases some1 will might say that there are same.
For me is coin. Cuz most of talking is coin this coin that. In conversation you will say coin.
But I agree that if we need to described it it more token then coin.
|
▄▄▄██████▄▄▄ ▄██████████████████▄ ▄████████████████████████▄ ▄▄ ▄████████████████████████████▄ ███████████████████████████████████▄ ▀▀█████████████████████████████████▄ ██████████████████████████████████ ██████████████████████████████████ ██████████████████████████████████ ██████████████████████████████████ ▀████████████████████████████████▀ ▀██████████████████████████████▀ ▀▀██████████████████████████▀ ▀██████████████████████▀ ▀▀▀████████████▀▀▀ | .
| .....█ .....█ .....█ .....█ .....█ .....█ | | █ █ █ █ █ █ |
|
|
|
yatsey87
|
|
October 17, 2014, 11:34:10 AM |
|
bitcoins are not coins, but a token is a better term. remember a token is not like a casino chip (round piece of plastic) or a supermarket coupon (piece of paper) a token has more meaning then that. google 'session token' for instance .. screw it ill spell it out for yousession token is a piece of data that is used in network communications (often over HTTP) to identify a session, a series of related message exchanges. so bitcoins are closer to being described as a token rather than a coin Exactly, I don't think referring to it either a token or a coin is a bad thing, but I prefer to just see it for what it is and that's a decentralized digital money.
|
|
|
|
franky1
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 4298
Merit: 4626
|
|
October 17, 2014, 11:57:08 AM |
|
there will always be some disagreements over what to describe bitcoin as, because people have different IQ levels and understand things differently. they need analogies and comparisons to real life stuff.
some may disagree that its "digital gold" for instance
some people have analogized bitcoin as a digital cheque, because the transaction shows where the funds come from (long numbers at bottom of cheque), where it is going to (hand written destination) amount. and is then signed... which then goes into a banking network to be confirmed(cheque clearing house)
and the most funniest dispute about what bitcoin is, was the reply to
"its a digital decentralized peer-to-peer ledger secured sing cryptography"
the reply: "hmmmm .. so its german then"
|
I DO NOT TRADE OR ACT AS ESCROW ON THIS FORUM EVER. Please do your own research & respect what is written here as both opinion & information gleaned from experience. many people replying with insults but no on-topic content substance, automatically are 'facepalmed' and yawned at
|
|
|
Q7
|
|
October 17, 2014, 12:04:12 PM |
|
Well i wouldn't care so much on what you decide to call it... in fact anything you want as long as i can spend it like real money, that is good for me but i prefer to have it call coin than token to reflect it as some sort of currency. Token is somehow related to being or having issued by someone.... but no. I prefer coins
|
|
|
|
Sutters Mill
|
|
October 17, 2014, 12:40:30 PM |
|
there will always be some disagreements over what to describe bitcoin as, because people have different IQ levels and understand things differently. they need analogies and comparisons to real life stuff.
some may disagree that its "digital gold" for instance
some people have analogized bitcoin as a digital cheque, because the transaction shows where the funds come from (long numbers at bottom of cheque), where it is going to (hand written destination) amount. and is then signed... which then goes into a banking network to be confirmed(cheque clearing house)
I wouldn't say bitcoin is digital gold, but I like it as a comparison. I've not heard the cheque comparison before but I like that too, though cheques usually take days to clear, so bitcoin is much faster than that.
|
|
|
|
franky1
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 4298
Merit: 4626
|
|
October 17, 2014, 01:01:11 PM |
|
there will always be some disagreements over what to describe bitcoin as, because people have different IQ levels and understand things differently. they need analogies and comparisons to real life stuff.
some may disagree that its "digital gold" for instance
some people have analogized bitcoin as a digital cheque, because the transaction shows where the funds come from (long numbers at bottom of cheque), where it is going to (hand written destination) amount. and is then signed... which then goes into a banking network to be confirmed(cheque clearing house)
I wouldn't say bitcoin is digital gold, but I like it as a comparison. I've not heard the cheque comparison before but I like that too, though cheques usually take days to clear, so bitcoin is much faster than that. and thats how you say it to people.. digital cheque that is accepted instantly and people can walk off (unconfirmed) and it gets cleared in 10 minutes usually many people think that a cup of coffee at a starbucks would require people waiting until bitcoin confirms. yet using the cheque analogy is a easy explanation that for such small amounts its not worth the hassle of waiting for confirmation, and just accept it on trust. much like how people dont verify cheques for only $10, but would verify with a bank for amounts of over $100
|
I DO NOT TRADE OR ACT AS ESCROW ON THIS FORUM EVER. Please do your own research & respect what is written here as both opinion & information gleaned from experience. many people replying with insults but no on-topic content substance, automatically are 'facepalmed' and yawned at
|
|
|
odolvlobo
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 4396
Merit: 3305
|
|
October 17, 2014, 04:36:19 PM |
|
Token, coin, whatever -- I challenge anyone to show me a bitcoin.
|
Join an anti-signature campaign: Click ignore on the members of signature campaigns. PGP Fingerprint: 6B6BC26599EC24EF7E29A405EAF050539D0B2925 Signing address: 13GAVJo8YaAuenj6keiEykwxWUZ7jMoSLt
|
|
|
|
cbeast
Donator
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1736
Merit: 1006
Let's talk governance, lipstick, and pigs.
|
|
October 18, 2014, 04:22:16 AM |
|
Token, coin, whatever -- I challenge anyone to show me a bitcoin.
Is that a veiled attempt at begging for bitcoins? Token: a voucher Voucher: a receipt Receipt: the action of receiving something or the fact of its being received Token == the action of receiving something or the fact of its being received
|
Any significantly advanced cryptocurrency is indistinguishable from Ponzi Tulips.
|
|
|
odolvlobo
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 4396
Merit: 3305
|
|
October 18, 2014, 05:10:36 AM |
|
Dollars, euros and pounds are easy to visualize: They’re physical objects ...
Dollars, euros and pounds are not physical. They are no more tangible than bitcoins. Token, coin, whatever -- I challenge anyone to show me a bitcoin.
Is that a veiled attempt at begging for bitcoins? No, just a challenge, and a learning opportunity. If your disagree with the OP, then I challenge you to point to one of these bitcoin tokens.
|
Join an anti-signature campaign: Click ignore on the members of signature campaigns. PGP Fingerprint: 6B6BC26599EC24EF7E29A405EAF050539D0B2925 Signing address: 13GAVJo8YaAuenj6keiEykwxWUZ7jMoSLt
|
|
|
cbeast
Donator
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1736
Merit: 1006
Let's talk governance, lipstick, and pigs.
|
|
October 18, 2014, 06:06:36 AM |
|
Dollars, euros and pounds are easy to visualize: They’re physical objects ...
Dollars, euros and pounds are not physical. They are no more tangible than bitcoins. Token, coin, whatever -- I challenge anyone to show me a bitcoin.
Is that a veiled attempt at begging for bitcoins? No, just a challenge, and a learning opportunity. If your disagree with the OP, then I challenge you to point to one of these bitcoin tokens. is this an ontological argument now?
|
Any significantly advanced cryptocurrency is indistinguishable from Ponzi Tulips.
|
|
|
EnzoBlaque
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 15
Merit: 0
|
|
October 18, 2014, 10:30:37 AM |
|
Yeah it's not a coin either.
lol, this
|
|
|
|
zetaray
|
|
October 18, 2014, 10:37:09 AM |
|
Bitcoin is not a coin or a token. It is a number on a public ledger, not dissimilar to an account balance in a bank. The name doesn't matter, it only matters if it has resell value.
|
|
|
|
hundi.online
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 34
Merit: 0
|
|
April 12, 2018, 06:53:14 PM |
|
Bitcoin is a Crypto - currency, while ICO Tokens are explained as below - When a cryptocurrency startup firm wants to raise money through an Initial Coin Offering (ICO), it usually creates a plan on a whitepaper which states what the project is about, what need(s) the project will fulfill upon completion, how much money is needed to undertake the venture, how much of the virtual tokens the pioneers of the project will keep for themselves, what type of money is accepted, and how long the ICO campaign will run for. During the ICO campaign, enthusiasts and supporters of the firm’s initiative buy some of the distributed cryptocoins with fiat or virtual currency. These coins are referred to as tokens and are similar to shares of a company sold to investors in an Initial Public Offering (IPO) transaction. If the money raised does not meet the minimum funds required by the firm, the money is returned to the backers and the ICO is deemed to be unsuccessful. If the funds requirements are met within the specified timeframe, the money raised is used to either initiate the new scheme or to complete it.
|
|
|
|
|