Scam coins

[bassieflup]

 o

[Spoetnik]

i think they are great the last one called ScamCoin #1,328 made me 6 Bitcoins 
and that is all that matters !

if NAMBLA made a coin i would buy it and trade cause i like Lambo'z
then i will pretend i am against the coin on forums etc.. shhh, this is our little secret OP

[ILoveBigBlackCocks]

i think they are great the last one called ScamCoin #1,328 made me 6 Bitcoins 
and that is all that matters !

if NAMBLA made a coin i would buy it and trade cause i like Lambo'z
then i will pretend i am against the coin on forums etc.. shhh, this is our little secret OP

This.  Only so many good coins out there.  Once the scams stop, my bitcoin intake slows down dramatically.  Get to cloning more githubs boys, you are doing god's work.

[MisO69]

The problem is the supporting infrastructure.

Pools and Exchanges in collaboration with the scam coin devs. Don't tell me they don't know what they are doing. They absolutely do and its all about greed.

This will not stop until the community stops supporting these obvious scams. I can say for certain that 99% of the coins here are scams. There is your list bub.

So I guess my point is it will never stop. 

[Undermood]

Send the scamcoin to http://CoinshieldTalk.org/ to be voted to be scamcoin, the system will destroy the scamcoin. This is their new created platform ANN https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=657601 .

[NeuroticFish]

Identity is very important. But something better than Coins Source - or the way they handled MidasCoin for example (see here: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=784286.msg9190094#msg9190094 )


Also maybe some escrow + arbitrage "institution" (and fund) could be useful. If a coin wants to gain credibility, devs will put some money into the fund and they will be able to get that money back only after some months, when the coin is stable enough (the amount depends on premine, ICO, IPO, "backed with gold" or such promises).

[ILoveBigBlackCocks]

Identity is very important. But something better than Coins Source - or the way they handled MidasCoin for example (see here: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=784286.msg9190094#msg9190094 )


Also maybe some escrow + arbitrage "institution" (and fund) could be useful. If a coin wants to gain credibility, devs will put some money into the fund and they will be able to get that money back only after some months, when the coin is stable enough (the amount depends on premine, ICO, IPO, "backed with gold" or such promises).

Yes!  Trusted escrow.  Just like with SYScoin.  How did that work out?

Face it guys, the whole community is rotten to the core.