Banning Male Urinals

[egghead123]

just piss on the floor

[Wilikon]

just piss on the floor

[Dahhi]

They have female urinals as well, so how can it be sexist?

I hate the design for the female urinal. You will end up having drops of urine splashing on your thighs as you pee! The closet is best for women and I do not see anything wrong with the male urinal either.

[Wilikon]

They have female urinals as well, so how can it be sexist?

I hate the design for the female urinal. You will end up having drops of urine splashing on your thighs as you pee! The closet is best for women and I do not see anything wrong with the male urinal either.

Feminists do. You are wrong and they are right.
 

[TECSHARE]

They have female urinals as well, so how can it be sexist?

Is it me or does this female urinal just scream penis envy (in more ways than one)?

[Wilikon]

They have female urinals as well, so how can it be sexist?

Is it me or does this female urinal just scream penis envy (in more ways than one)?

The male urinal lets you pee from a distance and be done with it. The female urinal is a tongue with yeast infection or worse. It would be safer to wipe then sit on a toilet than climbing that contaminated pony, especially if you are drunk. You could stab your vagina. Also the female urinal is sexist. Lots of women love jeans, not skirts.

[designerusa]

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Jr59wELgFDo

this is the most ridiculous debate that i have ever heard .. i think nobody cares about male urinals in public restrooms .. everyone wants to pee and feel comfortable... some feminists must leave male urinals alone for sure..

[magnific61]

I agree with it so that they are smelling bad and it is not comfortable to wash organ. By the way, urine by standing is not healthy and causes bladder an prostate disseases

[Wilikon]

I agree with it so that they are smelling bad and it is not comfortable to wash organ. By the way, urine by standing is not healthy and causes bladder an prostate disseases

 


The subject of this thread is: 3rd reich feminism attacking male urinals.

[magnific61]

I agree with it so that they are smelling bad and it is not comfortable to wash organ. By the way, urine by standing is not healthy and causes bladder an prostate disseases

 


The subject of this thread is: 3rd reich feminism attacking male urinals.

  Funny!
But really should wash organ after urine for health. I don't use it. It is better to use toilet for clean but ofcourse urinals are more comfortable if you don't clean and you're willing to take risk of dissease

[TECSHARE]

I agree with it so that they are smelling bad and it is not comfortable to wash organ. By the way, urine by standing is not healthy and causes bladder an prostate disseases

 


The subject of this thread is: 3rd reich feminism attacking male urinals.

  Funny!
But really should wash organ after urine for health. I don't use it. It is better to use toilet for clean but ofcourse urinals are more comfortable if you don't clean and you're willing to take risk of dissease

I don't know who told you this, but urine is fairly sterile.

[jassii]

I can't imagine women wanting a unisex bathroom.I would think that they want their privacy. I've had females tell me that there public bathrooms are a filthy disaster. Since most of them squat they don't always have the best aim. Not to mention the used pads left in the toilet bowl. 

[Swordsoffreedom]

I can't imagine women wanting a unisex bathroom.I would think that they want their privacy. I've had females tell me that there public bathrooms are a filthy disaster. Since most of them squat they don't always have the best aim. Not to mention the used pads left in the toilet bowl. 

True enough but if you debate that point of reasoning you will invoke a fire Storm from the Extreme Left and individuals who demand that unisex bathrooms be the standard.
http://www.wral.com/-bathroom-bill-backers-rally-at-capitol/15635714/
http://globalnews.ca/video/2632198/supporters-protesters-of-controversial-bathroom-bill-hold-rallies-in-north-carolina

[BADecker]

No, no, no. Banning male urinals is all about using Ban deodorant on them.

 

[TECSHARE]

The whole point of this debate began with the European feminazi push to feminize all men and force them to sit to pee like their penis envied lesbian sisters. Furthermore it is also about punishing men for being born with a penis. This rule effectively would force men to endure much longer lines in bathrooms just like the women have to for lack of a member. This has critical theory written all over it.

[tvbcof]

The whole point of this debate began with the European feminazi push to feminize all men and force them to sit to pee like their penis envied lesbian sisters. Furthermore it is also about punishing men for being born with a penis. This rule effectively would force men to endure much longer lines in bathrooms just like the women have to for lack of a member. This has critical theory written all over it.

I theorize that if you decompile the binary (or a lot of the shared object libraries) of a feminist (or eco-freak or any number of other mostly left-wing crazies) you will find source code writen by globalist with a longer term agenda.  Most often it is competely undetected by the bot-like individual themselves even at fairly high levels in their organizations.

In this case what is probably happening is about survailance or 'total information awareness' and bathrooms are still kinda taboo for invasive monitoring.  I'll bet it drives the control freaks crazy.  About a day after the unisex bathroom is ready some pervy wanker will jump on the oportunity to get his rocks off.  The solution to that problem will be survailence cams and half the population or more will be begging for them.

[TECSHARE]

The whole point of this debate began with the European feminazi push to feminize all men and force them to sit to pee like their penis envied lesbian sisters. Furthermore it is also about punishing men for being born with a penis. This rule effectively would force men to endure much longer lines in bathrooms just like the women have to for lack of a member. This has critical theory written all over it.

I theorize that if you decompile the binary (or a lot of the shared object libraries) of a feminist (or eco-freak or any number of other mostly left-wing crazies) you will find source code writen by globalist with a longer term agenda.  Most often it is competely undetected by the bot-like individual themselves even at fairly high levels in their organizations.

In this case what is probably happening is about survailance or 'total information awareness' and bathrooms are still kinda taboo for invasive monitoring.  I'll bet it drives the control freaks crazy.  About a day after the unisex bathroom is ready some pervy wanker will jump on the oportunity to get his rocks off.  The solution to that problem will be survailence cams and half the population or more will be begging for them.

That source code is called Marxism.

[Moloch]

Urinal Hand Washing Fail
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0-OYM7AhW7Q

[tvbcof]

The whole point of this debate began with the European feminazi push to feminize all men and force them to sit to pee like their penis envied lesbian sisters. Furthermore it is also about punishing men for being born with a penis. This rule effectively would force men to endure much longer lines in bathrooms just like the women have to for lack of a member. This has critical theory written all over it.

I theorize that if you decompile the binary (or a lot of the shared object libraries) of a feminist (or eco-freak or any number of other mostly left-wing crazies) you will find source code writen by globalist with a longer term agenda.  Most often it is competely undetected by the bot-like individual themselves even at fairly high levels in their organizations.

In this case what is probably happening is about survailance or 'total information awareness' and bathrooms are still kinda taboo for invasive monitoring.  I'll bet it drives the control freaks crazy.  About a day after the unisex bathroom is ready some pervy wanker will jump on the oportunity to get his rocks off.  The solution to that problem will be survailence cams and half the population or more will be begging for them.

That source code is called Marxism.

I don't believe so.

Marx had a progression which was ordered ... ---> capitalism ---> communism.  Brzezinski took it a step farther ... ---> capitalism ---> communism --> technocracy.  Technocracy is envisioned to have corporations basically own everything and employ technocrats who manage society.

I think that what we have here is a situation where collectivism in various forms (including Marxism) is promoted heavily.  Taught in schools, sold to various narrow interest groups such as feminist and eco-freaks as a way to achieve their goals, sold to power hungry as a way to focus their control, sold to money hungry as a way to get assets for pennies on the dollar, etc.  All of this is mostly just a stepping stone however.

I see things as a 'scissors, rock, paper' type deal:

 - Capitalism trumps Technocracy because the latter is simple slavery which will certainly degrade into something awful within a short time (and it being birthed corrupt from the get-go in fact.)

 - Communism trumps Capitalism when the distribution of wealth gets to high, and it also has the power to collectivize resources (land, minerals, etc) allowing them to be handed over to oligarchs without much fuss.

 - Technocracy trump Communism since it is more efficient and sounds good compared to the awful track record of Communism every time it has been attempted.  Technocracy is only very practical with technolgies which are only recently mature.

Anyway, I think that at the upper levels of the Globalists they see this very clearly.  They already own most of the corporations who are going to ease into place.  And the plebs are getting antsy as evidenced by such events as the occupy movement, Trump/Sanders, the troubles in EU-land, etc.  As time goes by more and more people see the regionalization, the TPP-like trade deals (run by the U.N. which is the center mass for the 'new world order' Technocracy project, and their eyes begin to open up.  The 'sweet spot' for implementation is probably very near at hand.

[TECSHARE]

Do some research on "critical theory" and "The Frankfurt School", and tell me again this shared "source code" for insane liberals is not based on Marxism. I am not sure what the relation of the rest of your statement with this point is. It seems as if you are diverging off into another topic.