What's with the price of Qora?

[twospirit]

we are going up! 

[rabbiter]

we are going up! 

Not if Renat0 is tolerated and his price manipulation.


You've been fooled by him, he wins. Expect I think he thinks the price will shoot up the moment he wants to sell but at this rate the price will stay in this range he has artificially made. Screw him and screw the idiots at Qora.

[Vrontis]

Yeah OK...  like your sleazy wannabe sarcasm while beating around the bush is gonna convince us all...   

See, it's quite easy to troll at more intellectual level.

Now let's talk about QoraAT. Do you know that in its beginning AT idea was developed by CIYAM and me? We were talking a lot via Skype. During one of these talks an idea of Atomic Cross-Chain Exchange was born. This idea is not mine, it's CIYAM's too, I consider it as 50/50. Here is my post that proves that I knew how to do atomic cross-exchanges several months ago - https://nxtforum.org/smart-contracts/express-your-wish-(smart-contracts)/msg64511/#msg64511.

Would you still post this tweet - https://twitter.com/CryptoScalper/status/522103357012709377 - if you knew all this?

I have made a research on that based on your words of how the idea has been born and AT seems that it has adopted ideas who were published already.
Turing completeness in crypto currencies has been firstly exposed by Vitalik, right?
Atomic cross trades was firstly been published by Sergio_Demian_Lerner.

AT seems based as I said on those ideas which is pretty healthy and discussions around them is what can bring it to life.
But my research has been made to see the development progress of AT, not only about the idea.Have you developed AT or contributed in the development further than those brainstorms?
Because as I said discussions around it can have a proper workaround on this and afterwards the development is taking place according to the proper work flow that it has been established based on those discussions (and it's actually shaping forms during time).
It is really different to say idea was born and developed and different to have a final product based on the prior ideas around it and that's why I am asking you if you have been involved furthermore than the brainstorms around it.

What has motivated me to make this research?
I think that it is not healthy to say that if you have not contributed in the development of AT and it is not healthy to not being a part of it if you have contributed to the development of it.Brainstorming around ideas is something usual and every one can grab ideas to implement them into his own projects.

[Come-from-Beyond]

I have made a research on that based on your words of how the idea has been born and AT seems that it has adopted ideas who were published already.
Turing completeness in crypto currencies has been firstly exposed by Vitalik, right?
Atomic cross trades was firstly been published by Sergio_Demian_Lerner.

AT seems based as I said on those ideas which is pretty healthy and discussions around them is what can bring it to life.
But my research has been made to see the development progress of AT, not only about the idea.Have you developed AT or contributed in the development further than those brainstorms?
Because as I said discussions around it can have a proper workaround on this and afterwards the development is taking place according to the proper work flow that it has been established based on those discussions (and it's actually shaping forms during time).
It is really different to say idea was born and developed and different to have a final product based on the prior ideas around it and that's why I am asking you if you have been involved furthermore than the brainstorms around it.

What has motivated me to make this research?
I think that it is not healthy to say that if you have not contributed in the development of AT and it is not healthy to not being a part of it if you have contributed to the development of it.Brainstorming around ideas is something usual and every one can grab ideas to implement them into his own projects.

I only brainstormed this idea with Ian. Ah, I also initiated all this by contacting kLee who approached Ian. The idea is very obvious and naturally follows from SPV description of Satoshi's whitepaper. Here - https://nxtforum.org/general-discussion/not-a-holy-grail-of-cryptocurrencies-but-still-a-very-usable-artifact/ - I extended the idea for a case of two currencies bound via a third one and (what a surprise!) few days later Adam Back et al. publish their Sidechains whitepaper that explains the same method. If we want to choose the original inventor of atomic cross-exchanges then it's Satoshi without any doubt.

[jabo38]

I have made a research on that based on your words of how the idea has been born and AT seems that it has adopted ideas who were published already.
Turing completeness in crypto currencies has been firstly exposed by Vitalik, right?
Atomic cross trades was firstly been published by Sergio_Demian_Lerner.

AT seems based as I said on those ideas which is pretty healthy and discussions around them is what can bring it to life.
But my research has been made to see the development progress of AT, not only about the idea.Have you developed AT or contributed in the development further than those brainstorms?
Because as I said discussions around it can have a proper workaround on this and afterwards the development is taking place according to the proper work flow that it has been established based on those discussions (and it's actually shaping forms during time).
It is really different to say idea was born and developed and different to have a final product based on the prior ideas around it and that's why I am asking you if you have been involved furthermore than the brainstorms around it.

What has motivated me to make this research?
I think that it is not healthy to say that if you have not contributed in the development of AT and it is not healthy to not being a part of it if you have contributed to the development of it.Brainstorming around ideas is something usual and every one can grab ideas to implement them into his own projects.

I only brainstormed this idea with Ian. Ah, I also initiated all this by contacting kLee who approached Ian. The idea is very obvious and naturally follows from SPV description of Satoshi's whitepaper. Here - https://nxtforum.org/general-discussion/not-a-holy-grail-of-cryptocurrencies-but-still-a-very-usable-artifact/ - I extended the idea for a case of two currencies bound via a third one and (what a surprise!) few days later Adam Back et al. publish their Sidechains whitepaper that explains the same method. If we want to choose the original inventor of atomic cross-exchanges then it's Satoshi without any doubt.

In the year 2045 CfB, Satoshi, and Back are jointly award a Noble prize for their work in cross chain exchanges.  Only Back shows up.  hehehe

[Tobo]

What has motivated me to make this research?
I think that it is not healthy to say that if you have not contributed in the development of AT and it is not healthy to not being a part of it if you have contributed to the development of it.Brainstorming around ideas is something usual and every one can grab ideas to implement them into his own projects.

To do the research, the early NXT thread is the best place, for example:

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=345619.msg5103208#msg5103208


https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=search2;params=YWR2YW5jZWR8J3wwfCJ8dG9waWN8J3wzNDU2MTl8InxzaG93X2NvbXBsZXRlfCd8MXwifGJyZHwnfDE1OXwifHN1YmplY3Rfb25seXwnfHwifHNvcnR8J3xyZWxldmFuY2V8Inxzb3J0X2RpcnwnfGRlc2N8InxzZWFyY2h8J3x0dXJpbmc=;start=150

[wizzardTim]

Social Network for the first time worldwide using blockchain technology is now a reality thanks to QORA.
Also profile making, blog post, web hosting. All free, anonymous and user-friendly!

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1015379.msg11976426#msg11976426

Decentralized search engine for the QORA web: http://qora.co.in:9090/index/main.html
Main public Qora board: http://qora.co.in:9090/index/blog.html
Private blogs: http://qora.co.in:9090/index/blogdirectory.html , eg. http://qora.co.in:9090/index/blog.html?blogname=cyborg


To all QORA owners: don't forget to vote regarding the BitShares integration: http://qora.co.in:9090/index/blockexplorer.html?poll=integrate%20qora%20to%20bitshares

There are many innovations with the new qora release, please check the main thread https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1015379.0 or join slack for full-action.

[Ingatqhvq]

Qora is totally under valued. People will know this if they really spend a few time to learn about it.
.                                                             

[freigeist]

Qora is totally under valued. People will know this if they really spend a few time to learn about it.
.                                                             

The only issue is how to make them spend some time to learn.
This issue is not only related to QORA but to all other 2.0 coins.

[HalFinneysBrain]

I'm pretty sad right now that I had 15% of my Qora in a sell at 10, before the price jump.  We could be looking at HUGE percentage increases in the near future, if the decentralized blogging/web/social network features catch on. 

Right now almost nobody has any Qora, price could go crazy.