Bitcoin Forum
November 05, 2024, 01:11:50 PM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 28.0 [Torrent]
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  
Pages: « 1 [2]  All
  Print  
Author Topic: Re: What are checkpoints in bitcoin code?  (Read 2812 times)
DumbFruit
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 433
Merit: 267


View Profile
November 07, 2014, 05:00:48 PM
 #21

Essentially what I'm trying to figure out is a mechanism for blockchain compression so that we can drop very old txs with minimal to no loss in security.
Hardcore "compression"; Implement max blockchain height of 100,000. When block 100,000 is mined, drop the oldest 50,000 blocks. The remaining oldest block is the new "genesis block". Any remaining unspent outputs on the dropped blocks are given to the miner.

Bam, done.  Grin

By their (dumb) fruits shall ye know them indeed...
DannyHamilton
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 3472
Merit: 4801



View Profile
November 07, 2014, 05:10:19 PM
 #22

When block 100,000 is mined, drop the oldest 50,000 blocks. The remaining oldest block is the new "genesis block". Any remaining unspent outputs on the dropped blocks are given to the miner.

Bam, done.  Grin

This is a horrible idea.

Thankfully it can't be implemented without consensus from all of the users of bitcoin, and I'm confident that you'll never be able to get consensus on such a poor proposal.
DumbFruit
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 433
Merit: 267


View Profile
November 07, 2014, 05:20:31 PM
 #23

When block 100,000 is mined, drop the oldest 50,000 blocks. The remaining oldest block is the new "genesis block". Any remaining unspent outputs on the dropped blocks are given to the miner.

Bam, done.  Grin

This is a horrible idea.

Thankfully it can't be implemented without consensus from all of the users of bitcoin, and I'm confident that you'll never be able to get consensus on such a poor proposal.
Yep, it's a pretty bad idea for Bitcoin.

Do you mean it couldn't get consensus to make that change among users, because I totally agree with that, or do you mean that the blockchain couldn't get consensus with a sliding history like this, because I don't agree with that (For the most part.).

By their (dumb) fruits shall ye know them indeed...
Pages: « 1 [2]  All
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!