Tool auto for Coincheckin.com page to make BTC

[buithanh32]

Coincheckin is a free site for BTC as every other page , but it only began to enter CAPT first time we will be able to run the tool comfortable
Coincheckin lets get BTC 5 minutes / time

I would like to share auto tool for this page . You just download and run . Enter for BTC , CAPT finished typing the enter and run offline. Because this site only began entering Capt 1 should feel free to run the tool . Priority for Firefox offline!
People who do not know this site please support the spirit ref too

Download>>http://megabitload.com/download/index/2377167/

[1714868215]

1714868215

[1714868215]

1714868215

[belk]

Is this ok to download? Anyone here downloaded this?

[Muhammed Zakir]

What do you mean by "offline"? You might want to change the phrase there.

Is this ok to download? Anyone here downloaded this?

Run the program in softwares like Avast. It will protdct you from viruses.

   ~~MZ~~

[Muhammed Zakir]

Why is that poll needed? Please correct it with a question, now the question is unclear.

Can you please upload the files to 4share or rapidshare. They are faster. Thanks in advance!

   ~~MZ~~

[elliwilli]

Checking for malware. will post results in a second.

!!EDIT!!
Not infected but the macro contains a callback to a adfly and a referal link to zeusmining meaning that someone is making money from it.

[notlist3d]

Checking for malware. will post results in a second.

!!EDIT!!
Not infected but the macro contains a callback to a adfly and a referal link to zeusmining meaning that someone is making money from it.

If you do run this just be careful.  Don't use it on a computer that you log into, or have access to wallets.   

[elliwilli]

Checking for malware. will post results in a second.

!!EDIT!!
Not infected but the macro contains a callback to a adfly and a referal link to zeusmining meaning that someone is making money from it.

If you do run this just be careful.  Don't use it on a computer that you log into, or have access to wallets.   

Its fine to do all of those things actualy.
There is nothing malicious in the code at all, its just a referral link by the content creator to make some money. nothing insidious.

[pooya87]

here is the results of a quick check:
https://www.virustotal.com/en/url/6e1839f952acf8bb76d0987ba160f04886486066b9c881c6db890bd5d5d40305/analysis/1415008996/

1 malware warning, be careful

[Muhammed Zakir]

here is the results of a quick check:
https://www.virustotal.com/en/url/6e1839f952acf8bb76d0987ba160f04886486066b9c881c6db890bd5d5d40305/analysis/1415008996/

1 malware warning, be careful

The detection ratio is 1:60. I don't think there is any problem. Even BitDefender, Kaspersky etc... like great softwares didn't reported anything!

  ~~MZ~~

[Tammy Chan]

Don't trust your Anti-virus software 100%. They don't work that great.
http://www.forbes.com/sites/ciocentral/2014/05/21/duck-test-antivirus-software-wont-detect-advanced-malware/

The caveat here is that it is possible that AV vendors can achieve better detection rates than those measured here because those vendors may use other external signals and/or more aggressive configurations to detect malware-like code and behavior. Nevertheless, simple analysis of the raw data reveals a significant trend of missed malware and slow detection rates:

 On Day 0, only 51% of AV scanners detected new malware samples
 It took an average of two days for at least one AV scanner to detect malware that went undetected on the first day
 Detection rates bumped up to 61% after two weeks, indicating a common lag for AV signatures
 In one year, no single AV scanner caught every new malware sample in even one of the test days
 After a year, 10% of the scanners still do not detect some malware
 The 1-percentile of malware least likely to be detected was undetected by the majority of AV scanners for months, and in some cases was never detected

[notlist3d]

Don't trust your Anti-virus software 100%. They don't work that great.
http://www.forbes.com/sites/ciocentral/2014/05/21/duck-test-antivirus-software-wont-detect-advanced-malware/

The caveat here is that it is possible that AV vendors can achieve better detection rates than those measured here because those vendors may use other external signals and/or more aggressive configurations to detect malware-like code and behavior. Nevertheless, simple analysis of the raw data reveals a significant trend of missed malware and slow detection rates:

 On Day 0, only 51% of AV scanners detected new malware samples
 It took an average of two days for at least one AV scanner to detect malware that went undetected on the first day
 Detection rates bumped up to 61% after two weeks, indicating a common lag for AV signatures
 In one year, no single AV scanner caught every new malware sample in even one of the test days
 After a year, 10% of the scanners still do not detect some malware
 The 1-percentile of malware least likely to be detected was undetected by the majority of AV scanners for months, and in some cases was never detected

I'm amazed at the amount of people saying don't worry.  Always ask on software what is in it for maker.... this is free software... it says it will make you money essentially... sound to good to be true.. yes.

[RodeoX]

Is this ok to download? Anyone here downloaded this?

When is it ever a good idea to download and run closed-source software from an unknown creator? I'm not saying this is malicious, but you are crazy to use any bitcoin related software that is not open source.