Need web research done [1 BTC]

[AnonBitCoiner]

Has any escrow been submitted yet?

If he was a honest guy , you were paid 4 days ago.. so forget about this..

I'm pissed over this, because I did almost 900 sites manually.

Oh well.

Damn, son. How much time did you invest into that? Sorry for your losses, guys. Too many scammer nowadays; gotta make sure it's escrowed to ensure successful payment

// close thread please

[Candystripes]

Has any escrow been submitted yet?

If he was a honest guy , you were paid 4 days ago.. so forget about this..

I'm pissed over this, because I did almost 900 sites manually.

Oh well.

Damn, son. How much time did you invest into that? Sorry for your losses, guys. Too many scammer nowadays; gotta make sure it's escrowed to ensure successful payment

// close thread please

I still have a little bit of hope that he will come online.

I spent ~4 hours getting the links and pasting them.

[coiner8]

So the final lists I got were:

roslinpl - 100
conteaza - 1100 - list was 1200 but had some dupes
Candystripes - 842
TRICHED - 2965

sinecoin - said only half his list had domain names.  looks like a quick copy and paste from a wiki.  I don't trust the quality and therefore didn't request the actual list.

All of the other lists were good quality.  TRICHED's list was huge but most of the sites were still relevant.

Paid 1.5 BTC total.  5007 URLs = 0.000299581 BTC each.  Proportional payments:

roslinpl - 0.03 BTC to 19tBQCj71a2MCem23xjFgzNvKhcxjgCHwa - https://blockchain.info/tx/463afeedf6c46b25f46b0cbae1bbbae03268812a1ae155236ad9f251e77b3807
conteaza - 0.33 BTC to 15xcKtBDjVU67FkAzfXYzZfPHQ18Mbdy7T - https://blockchain.info/tx/4078b1845ad3fbd8385343860be0312f9f1074510f67fc2a0a2cc9af874edf06
Candystripes - 0.25 BTC to 1CandyPE2zp8TQ55BA9gUP4qgVHzzPdDQ7 - https://blockchain.info/tx/2e3160784c090a2f6b175b2a18597b9433d317d7c1cfc8516a0943d0562f626d
TRICHED - 0.89 BTC to 16kXabXYDdNK6VhV8wKnh6fWYmLEazpJRE - https://blockchain.info/tx/da49eee85386263cf0287b6ae2e26294f00937faca185d5f628e271bc9c1f621

And if anyone is going to complain about the payments not matching the OP (even though I added 0.5 BTC and divided up the payments as fairly as possible), realize that if I'd stuck to the OP the only person eligible would be Gianluca95 since he was the first to claim the job, and no one else would have gotten anything.  Adjusting the payments to match the situation was the best option.

[MakingMoneyHoney]

....
Proportional payments:

roslinpl - 0.03 BTC
conteaza - 0.33 BTC
Candystripes - 0.25 BTC
TRICHED - 0.89

And if anyone is going to complain about the payments not matching the OP (even though I added 0.5 BTC and divided up the payments as fairly as possible), realize that if I'd stuck to the OP the only person eligible would be Gianluca95 since he was the first to claim the job, and no one else would have gotten anything.  Adjusting the payments to match the situation was the best option.

You're a terrible liar, you could edit your own post, but the post that quoted you is at the bottom of my post. You specifically said TRICHED's wouldn't affect the proportions, and now you edited it out and let it affect the proportions.

I am so glad you skipped me, because I didn't have to sweat it out, knowing full well you'd skimp on the payout if you ever paid out at all, but I wanted to point out for fellow forumers that you are a liar, in pretty much every single post you've posted on this particular thread.

I can't help but think, TRICHED is just your alt account, and you got away with 4 times the work for a fraction of the pay listed in the OP.

Ok, these people were the first ones to claim the job:

Gianluca95
roslinpl
conteaza
Candystripes

So no one else should start working on it now.  I can't offer everyone the full amounts listed in the OP, but I'll divide up 1.5 BTC as fairly as I can based on the results submitted.  And I'll be contacting TRICHED separately, the bounty for this job won't be affected by anything I pay him.

For those four, whenever you have a completed list, please send a decent-sized sample by PM and the total number of sites, and we can agree on an amount for the full list.  The bounty isn't large enough to justify the effort to escrow.  Please review my posting history to see that I've paid for work here in the past without escrow.

Thanks for response.

I will send you PM later with some example list, detail with how it was made and some more infos.

Glad to be able to help.

Kind regards.

[TheNinja]

....
Proportional payments:

roslinpl - 0.03 BTC
conteaza - 0.33 BTC
Candystripes - 0.25 BTC
TRICHED - 0.89

And if anyone is going to complain about the payments not matching the OP (even though I added 0.5 BTC and divided up the payments as fairly as possible), realize that if I'd stuck to the OP the only person eligible would be Gianluca95 since he was the first to claim the job, and no one else would have gotten anything.  Adjusting the payments to match the situation was the best option.

You're a terrible liar, you could edit your own post, but the post that quoted you is at the bottom of my post. You specifically said TRICHED's wouldn't affect the proportions, and now you edited it out and let it affect the proportions.

I am so glad you skipped me, because I didn't have to sweat it out, knowing full well you'd skimp on the payout if you ever paid out at all, but I wanted to point out for fellow forumers that you are a liar, in pretty much every single post you've posted on this particular thread.

I can't help but think, TRICHED is just your alt account, and you got away with 4 times the work for a fraction of the pay listed in the OP.

Ok, these people were the first ones to claim the job:

Gianluca95
roslinpl
conteaza
Candystripes

So no one else should start working on it now.  I can't offer everyone the full amounts listed in the OP, but I'll divide up 1.5 BTC as fairly as I can based on the results submitted.  And I'll be contacting TRICHED separately, the bounty for this job won't be affected by anything I pay him.

For those four, whenever you have a completed list, please send a decent-sized sample by PM and the total number of sites, and we can agree on an amount for the full list.  The bounty isn't large enough to justify the effort to escrow.  Please review my posting history to see that I've paid for work here in the past without escrow.

Thanks for response.

I will send you PM later with some example list, detail with how it was made and some more infos.

Glad to be able to help.

Kind regards.

I agree with his post; glad I chose not to waste my time.

[coiner8]

You specifically said TRICHED's wouldn't affect the proportions, and now you edited it out and let it affect the proportions.

...because TRICHED said in a PM something about a list of 1,000,000 sites so I thought it was a list not specific to Bitcoin.  When he sent the actual list it was a researched list just like everyone else's.

Anyway, I offered 1 BTC for research.  I ended up paying out 1.5 BTC for research.  To the people that actually did the work.  /thread

[conteaza]

So the final lists I got were:

roslinpl - 100
conteaza - 1100 - list was 1200 but had some dupes
Candystripes - 842
TRICHED - 2965

sinecoin - said only half his list had domain names.  looks like a quick copy and paste from a wiki.  I don't trust the quality and therefore didn't request the actual list.

All of the other lists were good quality.  TRICHED's list was huge but most of the sites were still relevant.

Paid 1.5 BTC total.  5007 URLs = 0.000299581 BTC each.  Proportional payments:

roslinpl - 0.03 BTC to 19tBQCj71a2MCem23xjFgzNvKhcxjgCHwa - https://blockchain.info/tx/463afeedf6c46b25f46b0cbae1bbbae03268812a1ae155236ad9f251e77b3807
conteaza - 0.33 BTC to 15xcKtBDjVU67FkAzfXYzZfPHQ18Mbdy7T - https://blockchain.info/tx/4078b1845ad3fbd8385343860be0312f9f1074510f67fc2a0a2cc9af874edf06
Candystripes - 0.25 BTC to 1CandyPE2zp8TQ55BA9gUP4qgVHzzPdDQ7 - https://blockchain.info/tx/2e3160784c090a2f6b175b2a18597b9433d317d7c1cfc8516a0943d0562f626d
TRICHED - 0.89 BTC to 16kXabXYDdNK6VhV8wKnh6fWYmLEazpJRE - https://blockchain.info/tx/da49eee85386263cf0287b6ae2e26294f00937faca185d5f628e271bc9c1f621

And if anyone is going to complain about the payments not matching the OP (even though I added 0.5 BTC and divided up the payments as fairly as possible), realize that if I'd stuck to the OP the only person eligible would be Gianluca95 since he was the first to claim the job, and no one else would have gotten anything.  Adjusting the payments to match the situation was the best option.

Dude you were playing with our nerves,please don't do this in the future.
Payment received ,I'm removing red trust

[AnonBitCoiner]

So the final lists I got were:

roslinpl - 100
conteaza - 1100 - list was 1200 but had some dupes
Candystripes - 842
TRICHED - 2965

sinecoin - said only half his list had domain names.  looks like a quick copy and paste from a wiki.  I don't trust the quality and therefore didn't request the actual list.

All of the other lists were good quality.  TRICHED's list was huge but most of the sites were still relevant.

Paid 1.5 BTC total.  5007 URLs = 0.000299581 BTC each.  Proportional payments:

roslinpl - 0.03 BTC to 19tBQCj71a2MCem23xjFgzNvKhcxjgCHwa - https://blockchain.info/tx/463afeedf6c46b25f46b0cbae1bbbae03268812a1ae155236ad9f251e77b3807
conteaza - 0.33 BTC to 15xcKtBDjVU67FkAzfXYzZfPHQ18Mbdy7T - https://blockchain.info/tx/4078b1845ad3fbd8385343860be0312f9f1074510f67fc2a0a2cc9af874edf06
Candystripes - 0.25 BTC to 1CandyPE2zp8TQ55BA9gUP4qgVHzzPdDQ7 - https://blockchain.info/tx/2e3160784c090a2f6b175b2a18597b9433d317d7c1cfc8516a0943d0562f626d
TRICHED - 0.89 BTC to 16kXabXYDdNK6VhV8wKnh6fWYmLEazpJRE - https://blockchain.info/tx/da49eee85386263cf0287b6ae2e26294f00937faca185d5f628e271bc9c1f621

And if anyone is going to complain about the payments not matching the OP (even though I added 0.5 BTC and divided up the payments as fairly as possible), realize that if I'd stuck to the OP the only person eligible would be Gianluca95 since he was the first to claim the job, and no one else would have gotten anything.  Adjusting the payments to match the situation was the best option.

Dude you were playing with our nerves,please don't do this in the future.
Payment received ,I'm removing red trust

He didn't fully intend to scam; he hadn't logged in for a couple days haha

[Candystripes]

I am really pissed, you said that Triched would get a separate payment. Are you still accepting more sites? I am a bit mad to be honest

[MakingMoneyHoney]

You specifically said TRICHED's wouldn't affect the proportions, and now you edited it out and let it affect the proportions.

...because TRICHED said in a PM something about a list of 1,000,000 sites so I thought it was a list not specific to Bitcoin.  When he sent the actual list it was a researched list just like everyone else's.

Anyway, I offered 1 BTC for research.  I ended up paying out 1.5 BTC for research.  To the people that actually did the work.  /thread

If you weren't trying to be sneaky, why go back and edit the line out of your post? If that's true, you could have just posted you decided to include him now, but you deliberately went back and edited that one line out of your post and posted today as if you'd never said that.

You've already lied enough in this thread, I can't believe you in anything you say. You also have more negative trust than just the people in this thread, and honestly I believe you deserved the negative trust from the people in this thread, even if you did pay, just based on the fact that you said you'd send out the payment one day and then don't log in for another few days later, not to mention all the lying.

I am really pissed, you said that Triched would get a separate payment. Are you still accepting more sites? I am a bit mad to be honest

He's a liar. It's all over this thread. I'm a bit curious why'd you'd even offer to do more sites for him... 

Just because he paid something, doesn't mean he he did so in a fair manner. But by all means, feel free to. I'm just happy to have been skipped over, just so I could avoid doing any extra work I wasn't going to be paid fairly for.

[roslinpl]

Coiner8 thanks for 0.03 but in my opinion you should pay me 0.1 as it was told in the OP.

I understand that members sent huge lists to you and you are not able to pay as much for URLs but ...

When I was PMing with you before I sent you the list you told me that you are interested in my list and that you are waiting for small list to see the quality etc.

Price in that moment for the list of 100 was 0.1 BTC.
I sent you this list because price was 0.1
If I will knew that you will pay 0.03 instead of 0.1 I would think twice about doing this list for you.

That's why I feel ripped.

Changing rules in the middle of the game is not nice.
I was playing due to your rules and I was contacting with you before I sent anything.

And after a week instead of 0.1 BTC you are sending me 0.03 BTC.

Erhm.

Regards.

[Candystripes]

Instead of .85, I got .25. That is almost 2 sevenths of what I should be paid. You then said 1.5 will be split between the four of us, excluding TRICHED. Then you added him in and paid him most of the 1.5 BTC. How unfair and deceitful. You will be named a scammer until you pay-up fairly.

[JimClone]

Instead of .85, I got .25. That is almost 2 sevenths of what I should be paid. You then said 1.5 will be split between the four of us, excluding TRICHED. Then you added him in and paid him most of the 1.5 BTC. How unfair and deceitful. You will be named a scammer until you pay-up fairly.

At least you got something. I was only asking about proof of funds so I could do the bounty me being the second in Line. I think its rather unfair that I got excluded just for asking a simple question.

[TheNinja]

Instead of .85, I got .25. That is almost 2 sevenths of what I should be paid. You then said 1.5 will be split between the four of us, excluding TRICHED. Then you added him in and paid him most of the 1.5 BTC. How unfair and deceitful. You will be named a scammer until you pay-up fairly.

At least you got something. I was only asking about proof of funds so I could do the bounty me being the second in Line. I think its rather unfair that I got excluded just for asking a simple question.

It's not that you got excluded; you just didn't do the work either, haha :\

[leblanc]

im assuming based on everyones replies, the workload is already done.

[conteaza]

Instead of .85, I got .25. That is almost 2 sevenths of what I should be paid. You then said 1.5 will be split between the four of us, excluding TRICHED. Then you added him in and paid him most of the 1.5 BTC. How unfair and deceitful. You will be named a scammer until you pay-up fairly.

You got paid and you're still dissatisfied? You could get nothing instead of .25

[AnonBitCoiner]

im assuming based on everyones replies, the workload is already done.

It's over; don't think the OP is looking for any more, since he paid out what he said he would pay out. It's a justified dissatisfaction, since he didn't get paid what he was told he would get paid.