|
Buffer Overflow
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1652
Merit: 1016
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
November 13, 2014, 01:53:51 PM |
|
Think of it like this, we already mined and made the money ie Bitcoin so why keep making/mining more money and all the waste energy that comes with that.
Now it makes sense to use the mined money ie BCT to buy into other currencies or assets.
POW is dead.
I don't think you fully understand the role of the miners.
|
|
|
|
fiatpete
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 23
Merit: 0
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
November 13, 2014, 04:53:03 PM |
|
Are there any PoS coins without dev controlled checkpoints yet?
NXT has automatic rolling checkpoints, 720 blocks deep, controlled by software ("automatic rolling"), called blockchain re-org mechanism. Thanks for the reply, could you elaborate on how the checkpoints are 'controlled by software'? Is this some sort of consensus amongst nodes to agree the block 720 blocks ago can never be replaced even in a longer chain? Also out of interest how much time does it take to produce 720 blocks and many blocks are staking coins locked for?
|
|
|
|
devphp
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
November 13, 2014, 04:55:44 PM |
|
Are there any PoS coins without dev controlled checkpoints yet?
NXT has automatic rolling checkpoints, 720 blocks deep, controlled by software ("automatic rolling"), called blockchain re-org mechanism. Thanks for the reply, could you elaborate on how the checkpoints are 'controlled by software'? Is this some sort of consensus amongst nodes to agree the block 720 blocks ago can never be replaced even in a longer chain? Also out of interest how much time does it take to produce 720 blocks and many blocks are staking coins locked for? Yeah, it's consensus among nodes. More details in the whitepapers: https://nxtforum.org/general-discussion/nxt-papers-whitepapers-academic-and-economic/720 blocks on average is about 20 hours.
|
|
|
|
neuroMode
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
November 13, 2014, 05:39:44 PM |
|
POW is only evolving - see Myriadcoin.
|
|
|
|
devphp
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
November 13, 2014, 05:54:31 PM |
|
POW is only evolving - see Myriadcoin.
It always amazes me that PoW fanboys never give a flying f*ck about Myriadcoin. I mean if they truely believed in PoW, they would be supporting Myriadcoin, because it's the most secure of all PoW cryptos, but no, all they do is care about their mining profits, that's why PoW is dead, because miners dump most of what they mine, and that's not going to change.
|
|
|
|
thelonecrouton
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 966
Merit: 1000
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
November 13, 2014, 06:38:07 PM |
|
BTC and most PoW alts have blockchains that are effectively controlled by 3,4, maybe 5 people. Calling this 'decentralised' is a joke.
Centralised mining pools are a complete perversion of Satoshi's vision. They do not 'secure the network' they just provide convenient points of failure for attackers to exploit.
Anyone so inclined could destroy BTC by the simple coercion of 3 individuals whose identity is widely known. This is not security, it's a liability. BTC could be completely tanked for under $10000, depending on how many plane tickets the bad guy had to buy to kidnap the children of those 3 people.
Mention this fact to miners though and you just get a froth of entitled rage, and nonsense about 'biting the hand that feeds you.' You don't need petaflops of compute power to process a few transactions per second and write them to the distributed ledger.
Distributed PoW has value, centralised pools provide none.
If a coin uses PoW, p2pool should be mandatory.
|
|
|
|
neuroMode
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
November 13, 2014, 11:57:49 PM |
|
POW is only evolving - see Myriadcoin.
It always amazes me that PoW fanboys never give a flying f*ck about Myriadcoin. I mean if they truely believed in PoW, they would be supporting Myriadcoin, because it's the most secure of all PoW cryptos, but no, all they do is care about their mining profits, that's why PoW is dead, because miners dump most of what they mine, and that's not going to change. I can definitely see the point of miner dumping, and I can definitely imagine POW innovation where miner dumping is offset or even minimized. I wrote an article on that here: http://coinbrief.net/myriadcoin-merge-mining/I think some of the Myriad neglect is just due to people overlooking it or not being exposed to it yet. A lot of the cryptocurrency business here is just "pick a coin or dev it and then do all you can to pump the value then exit". There are the greedy people, tech people, and idealists here. I think Myriad attracts the latter 2 and it is helping the foundation of Myriad continue to progress. You would think a lot of the new altcoins today will have a hard time "getting to the top" and "staying at the top" if Bitcoiners see it as a threat. Once the dust settles you will see (in my opinion) Myriad rise to the top since it has robust protection against just some huge Bitcoin farm overtaking it while the nethash remains "relatively" low. This is how you cement your path onwards and upwards when starting amidst a craze of coin launches, scams, and different style of blockchain securities. If you want to see some more of the beauty of Myriad's multi-POW system, just check out this merged-mining p2pool hub for Myriad's 5 algorithms. This is how foundations are built and we push people to p2pool mine over regular pool mining from the start. Bitcoin is heavily reliant on centralized pools to survive. If we begin a p2pool culture with Myriad ON TOP of it's 5 decentralized mining algorithms....I think we have a better future in store. Of course, this isn't going to happen overnight. But I like to think we are ahead of the curve and people will see the virtues of Myriad. PS This isn't a sheep/sock-puppet post. Myriad has no premine, no instamine, no IPO or whatever.
|
|
|
|
Spoetnik
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1540
Merit: 1011
FUD Philanthropist™
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
November 14, 2014, 08:26:22 AM |
|
POW gives guys the chance too use existing hardware to start
not dead..
|
FUD first & ask questions later™
|
|
|
zing96
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
November 15, 2014, 05:58:29 PM |
|
POW gives guys the chance too use existing hardware to start
not dead..
PoW is not dead, but I think GPU mining is. I don't know how any little guy with a few GPUs can compete with renting miners, etc. I packed up my GPUs a while ago. It's just not profitable. Even with free electricity, the amount of time to maintain miners is almost not worth it.
|
|
|
|
digitalblock
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
November 15, 2014, 06:43:17 PM |
|
Well, I really don't get the concept of PoS. Doesn't that violate Godel's Incompleteness Theorem...? How can a system possibly secure itself? I think it's a road to centralization.
I agree with you 100%
|
|
|
|
|
hack_
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
November 16, 2014, 05:11:41 AM |
|
POW gives guys the chance too use existing hardware to start
not dead..
PoW is not dead, but I think GPU mining is. I don't know how any little guy with a few GPUs can compete with renting miners, etc. I packed up my GPUs a while ago. It's just not profitable. Even with free electricity, the amount of time to maintain miners is almost not worth it. It all depends on the "miracle" Algorithm of the year, there are a lot of them with GPU implementation so if someone releases a profitable coin (hopefully with merged mining) we'll see them make a comeback.
|
|
|
|
|