doof
|
|
December 02, 2014, 04:21:49 AM |
|
Yes, I made a mistake when I said WPF instead of WCF however I am right when I say WCF is not a real option. You can share with me a lot of links to msdn and that won't change my opinion. Have you ever seen a p2p app developed with wcf? No real software uses wcf, they use sockets instead. True, I havent seen any p2p wcf in the wild. Can you put a sample block in github?
|
|
|
|
|
|
The forum strives to allow free discussion of any ideas. All policies are built around this principle. This doesn't mean you can post garbage, though: posts should actually contain ideas, and these ideas should be argued reasonably.
|
|
|
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction.
|
|
|
lontivero (OP)
Full Member
Offline
Activity: 164
Merit: 128
Amazing times are coming
|
|
December 02, 2014, 05:11:51 AM |
|
Yes, I made a mistake when I said WPF instead of WCF however I am right when I say WCF is not a real option. You can share with me a lot of links to msdn and that won't change my opinion. Have you ever seen a p2p app developed with wcf? No real software uses wcf, they use sockets instead. True, I havent seen any p2p wcf in the wild. Can you put a sample block in github? I have an abandoned project that is not the best example https://github.com/lontivero/peer2net (I have to redo it some day)
|
|
|
|
doof
|
|
December 02, 2014, 05:41:05 AM |
|
Yes, I made a mistake when I said WPF instead of WCF however I am right when I say WCF is not a real option. You can share with me a lot of links to msdn and that won't change my opinion. Have you ever seen a p2p app developed with wcf? No real software uses wcf, they use sockets instead. True, I havent seen any p2p wcf in the wild. Can you put a sample block in github? I have an abandoned project that is not the best example https://github.com/lontivero/peer2net (I have to redo it some day) Ok. Ill be using a project like this and bitcoind in the short term. What happens if the processor is rerun, will duplicates be added? Could the block hash be a primary key to stop duplicates?
|
|
|
|
doof
|
|
December 02, 2014, 06:46:18 AM Last edit: December 03, 2014, 03:28:04 AM by doof |
|
Difficulty isn't correct
|
|
|
|
doof
|
|
December 04, 2014, 12:20:41 AM |
|
This project has saved me a bunch of time, and we seem to both have the same goal.
Not a lot of btc, but I sent you a tip. Thanks.
|
|
|
|
lontivero (OP)
Full Member
Offline
Activity: 164
Merit: 128
Amazing times are coming
|
|
December 04, 2014, 12:22:45 AM |
|
This project has saved me a bunch of time, and we seem to both have the same goal.
Not a lot of btc, but I sent you a tip. Thanks.
I saw it and appreciate it. Thx
|
|
|
|
doof
|
|
December 10, 2014, 12:42:40 AM |
|
I wrote this C# code to calculate the hash too https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=888078.0Might be worth adding a column in the block table to contain the hash. Seperate thread can hash the block, and then could reference one block to another.
|
|
|
|
Martijnvdc
|
|
December 10, 2014, 08:49:17 PM |
|
Thank you very much. I like the license!
|
|
|
|
Anti-Cen
Member
Offline
Activity: 210
Merit: 26
High fees = low BTC price
|
|
January 14, 2018, 01:10:24 AM |
|
Nice code friend and I did a hatchet job on the code but it does not work on the block.dat I am using because I think it's been change over these days to use Berkeley-DB format for the files but useful code none the less and well written See https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2748620.new#newSmall, simple and easy to follow and is a good starting point for anyone going down this road
|
Mining is CPU-wars and Intel, AMD like it nearly as much as big oil likes miners wasting electricity. Is this what mankind has come too.
|
|
|
|