BalloonBit.com | Provably Fair | 1% House Edge | Original gambling game

[inkha]

Bitcoin gambling revievs (best bitcoin gambling reviev site) added our site with 9.6 rating! The best ratings. We are very grateful to them!

Q: How do you get a review site to give you a 9.6 rating when your game isn't even provably fair?

I hope the answer isn't "send them some Bitcoins"!  

Edit: I found the review: http://bitcoingambling.reviews/ballonbit-com/

They give you 10/10 for "trust", which is odd considering:

1) it's a new site
2) nobody knows who you are
3) the game isn't provably fair

They also give you 9.5/10 for "community", but the site has no way I can see of even communicating with other players. Compare with PRCdice, which has an active chat box with a bunch of blindly devoted site supporters in it, and they only get 8.4/10 for "community", despite "Good chat community" being listed as a "pro" in their review.

I wish there was a better review site where the good sites got good reviews, but I guess it's not really possible; people would just game it, however it was set up.

Those are the rankings as the site has just been added, the reviews rankings are adjusted as users rank the review themselves below the review. Thus reviews are actually community driven and if you feel a ranking should be lower you can deem it so and have your personal review (which influences the over all ranking) below the posts like this:

[dooglus]

Those are the rankings as the site has just been added, the reviews rankings are adjusted as users rank the review themselves below the review. Thus reviews are actually community driven and if you feel a ranking should be lower you can deem it so and have your personal review (which influences the over all ranking) below the posts like this:

https://i.imgur.com/tKO1mQ2.jpg

Thanks, I didn't realise that.

It made me pick a rating for 'support', and I had no idea what to say since I've never had to use it. Allowing commenters to opt out of giving individual ratings would be useful.

[inkha]

Those are the rankings as the site has just been added, the reviews rankings are adjusted as users rank the review themselves below the review. Thus reviews are actually community driven and if you feel a ranking should be lower you can deem it so and have your personal review (which influences the over all ranking) below the posts like this:

https://i.imgur.com/tKO1mQ2.jpg

Thanks, I didn't realise that.

It made me pick a rating for 'support', and I had no idea what to say since I've never had to use it. Allowing commenters to opt out of giving individual ratings would be useful.

I see, i'l see what I can do. You can checkout the post now that I approved your reviews and it reflects in the overall score. I have it set to user reviews influencing the overall score 70%, But am thinking I may increase it.

[dooglus]

Those are the rankings as the site has just been added, the reviews rankings are adjusted as users rank the review themselves below the review. Thus reviews are actually community driven and if you feel a ranking should be lower you can deem it so and have your personal review (which influences the over all ranking) below the posts like this:

https://i.imgur.com/tKO1mQ2.jpg

Thanks, I didn't realise that.

It made me pick a rating for 'support', and I had no idea what to say since I've never had to use it. Allowing commenters to opt out of giving individual ratings would be useful.

I see, i'l see what I can do. You can checkout the post now that I approved your reviews and it reflects in the overall score. I have it set to user reviews influencing the overall score 70%, But am thinking I may increase it.

Maybe take user comments into account and use them to modify the main review if appropriate. The site owner was asked to add provable fairness and replied that he'd be adding stats soon, as if that proves anything...

The game looks good, but could you make the game provably fair (i.e. the "could win" rate is determined by server seed and client seed)?

The statistics page will be added soon, and you will see the truth.

[CoinTheCoin]

I wish there was a better review site where the good sites got good reviews, but I guess it's not really possible; people would just game it, however it was set up.

We are currently in the process of this and are scheduled to launch in a month or two.  We want to make sure we have accurate information and are working on ways to help users avoid sites that are likely to exploit their players. 

I'll be sending you a PM Dooglus shortly with some ideas I had as I know that you're trusted and want better transparency and security for crypto gaming sites.

[Watoshi-Dimobuto]

lol.

I wish the game was real...

[SpreadBit]

Nice concept mate. 

[arallmuus]

This is intresting

[algo3]

a few bugs but it's fun

[caga]

Nice concept mate. 

Nice concept, but the thread topic is misguiding . It says a new gambling system, but it should be a new gambling site or idea.

[dooglus]

I see, i'l see what I can do. You can checkout the post now that I approved your reviews and it reflects in the overall score. I have it set to user reviews influencing the overall score 70%, But am thinking I may increase it.

I signed up for your site using a long secure password.

Then it sent a copy of the password to me in a plain text email!

[BalloonBit.com]

I see, i'l see what I can do. You can checkout the post now that I approved your reviews and it reflects in the overall score. I have it set to user reviews influencing the overall score 70%, But am thinking I may increase it.

I signed up for your site using a long secure password.

Then it sent a copy of the password to me in a plain text email!

I think, that you are mistaken.
There is no emailing yet.

[dooglus]

I see, i'l see what I can do. You can checkout the post now that I approved your reviews and it reflects in the overall score. I have it set to user reviews influencing the overall score 70%, But am thinking I may increase it.

I signed up for your site using a long secure password.

Then it sent a copy of the password to me in a plain text email!

I think, that you are mistaken.
There is no emailing yet.

This thread is now about http://bitcoingambling.reviews/

[Minnlo]

Agree with others that you have to make the game provably fair.

I see, i'l see what I can do. You can checkout the post now that I approved your reviews and it reflects in the overall score. I have it set to user reviews influencing the overall score 70%, But am thinking I may increase it.

I signed up for your site using a long secure password.

Then it sent a copy of the password to me in a plain text email!

I think, that you are mistaken.
There is no emailing yet.

This thread is now about http://bitcoingambling.reviews/

Doog, it is all your fault lol.

[inkha]

I see, i'l see what I can do. You can checkout the post now that I approved your reviews and it reflects in the overall score. I have it set to user reviews influencing the overall score 70%, But am thinking I may increase it.

I signed up for your site using a long secure password.

Then it sent a copy of the password to me in a plain text email!

I think, that you are mistaken.
There is no emailing yet.

This thread is now about http://bitcoingambling.reviews/

thanks for the heads up i had the welcome email set as the default template but i removed the welcome email entirely now.

[rayhan]

ouhh its fun, nice concept 
but i wonder where the ballon fly.. lol

[Laboboy31]

This game sucks.

[BalloonBit.com]

This game sucks.

Random is random.
Nothing is impossible. The probability of such a scenario is 1 to 10000.

[BalloonBit.com]

This game sucks.

Random is random.
Nothing is impossible. The probability of such a scenario is 1 to 10000.

I feel sorry for you, for real. But there is a good one, that the bets where minimal.

[dooglus]

This game sucks.

http://puu.sh/db19r/7cf73eca83.png

That's really unlucky but at least you can be sure that the site didn't cheat you. Simply verify the rolls by - oh, wait... Scratch that, they refused to make it provably fair. So maybe they did cheat you.