Bitcoin Forum
May 05, 2024, 08:20:32 AM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 27.0 [Torrent]
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  
Pages: [1]
  Print  
Author Topic: sdfh  (Read 7983 times)
Anonymous
Guest

August 19, 2010, 07:24:37 PM
Last edit: September 11, 2011, 04:57:27 PM by davidonpda
 #1

sdfgsfhg
1714897232
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1714897232

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1714897232
Reply with quote  #2

1714897232
Report to moderator
The Bitcoin software, network, and concept is called "Bitcoin" with a capitalized "B". Bitcoin currency units are called "bitcoins" with a lowercase "b" -- this is often abbreviated BTC.
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction.
FreeMoney
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1246
Merit: 1014


Strength in numbers


View Profile WWW
August 19, 2010, 07:44:06 PM
 #2

I think not. I think that when a client considers a block bad it gets the transactions that were in it and rebroadcasts them or puts them in a block themselves.

Play Bitcoin Poker at sealswithclubs.eu. We're active and open to everyone.
satoshi
Founder
Sr. Member
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 364
Merit: 6723


View Profile
August 19, 2010, 08:28:50 PM
 #3

That's right.  You don't need to be re-broadcasting your transactions for it to work.

When any node disconnects a fork, it dumps all the transactions from the fork back into the transaction pool to add to the new chain.  The entire network is making sure to re-integrate your transactions again.  All you should see is that your number of confirmations starts over from 0.

In some types of forks, your transaction would have gotten into both forks already, so you're already good either way.
Pages: [1]
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!