Please Remove This Admin

[Candystripes]

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=41911

His trust explains enough, he makes random assumptions.

He is doing a terrible job. He shall be removed. It's like putting a 5 year old in front of a big red button that says "Blow up the world". Not the best idea, right?

I am asking for justice and for the best of the forum.

Thanks,
Candy

[1715226266]

1715226266

[1715226266]

1715226266

[1715226266]

1715226266

[1715226266]

1715226266

[1715226266]

1715226266

[1715226266]

1715226266

[hilariousandco]

Ban the BanBear.

Probably not really 'random assumptions' and will be based on some evidence at least seeing as he can see all your alts and browser/log-in details. He's usually pretty thorough and correct. Zolace claimed the exact same thing as you when he scammed and all his alts got busted but even I knew they all belonged to him based on other evidence. Is this one account you took as collateral or tried selling? Do you use tor or a proxy? It must be tied to you some way.

[Candystripes]

Ban the BanBear.

Probably not really 'random assumptions' and will be based on some evidence at least seeing as he can see all your alts and browser/log-in details. He's usually pretty thorough and correct. Zolace claimed the exact same thing as you when he scammed and all his alts got busted but even I knew they all belonged to him based on other evidence. Is this one account you took as collateral or tried selling? Do you use tor or a proxy? It must be tied to you some way.

I never tried to use this account as collateral. I don't use Tor or a proxy or any kind of network tunneling. It isn't tied to me in any way, it's just a weird admin making a false assumption.

Just look at his trust. Look at it. He sucks at guessing, it isn't his thing.

[b!z]

BadBear does his job fine. Moderating a forum like this one is hard, I imagine.

[hilariousandco]

Pretty much his last 20 negative feedbacks (including yours) are from 4 or 5 different users with all their alts. Getting negative retaliatory feedback from butthurt trolls and scammers is just part of the game and doesn't mean anything other than he's doing his job right. If you didn't use tor or a proxy then it's likely tied to you via ip address but obviously I don't have all the details. If he correctly tied you to your other alts then I can't see why he'd be wrong with this one.

[Candystripes]

Pretty much his last 20 negative feedbacks (including yours) are from 4 or 5 different users with all their alts. Getting negative retaliatory feedback from butthurt trolls and scammers is just part of the game and doesn't mean anything other than he's doing his job right. If you didn't use tor or a proxy then it's likely tied to you via ip address but obviously I don't have all the details. If he correctly tied you to your other alts then I can't see why he'd be wrong with this one.

Alts are ok to use, when were they not? He is an admin... he should be smart enough to check IPs at least.

[hilariousandco]

Where did I say it wasn't ok to use alts? If you have an alt that is a scammer though all your other accounts will recieve the same treatment when/if caught.

[Gleb Gamow]

[redsn0w]

Where did I say it wasn't ok to use alts? If you have an alt that is a scammer though all your other accounts will recieve the same treatment when/if caught.

Yeah you're right , alts account can be only used for a signature campaign or the normal forum activity and not for scam the other users.




PS: I'm really thinking this forum is better than cinema or a drama film .

[Quickseller]

Ban the BanBear.

Probably not really 'random assumptions' and will be based on some evidence at least seeing as he can see all your alts and browser/log-in details. He's usually pretty thorough and correct. Zolace claimed the exact same thing as you when he scammed and all his alts got busted but even I knew they all belonged to him based on other evidence. Is this one account you took as collateral or tried selling? Do you use tor or a proxy? It must be tied to you some way.

I never tried to use this account as collateral. I don't use Tor or a proxy or any kind of network tunneling. It isn't tied to me in any way, it's just a weird admin making a false assumption.

Just look at his trust. Look at it. He sucks at guessing, it isn't his thing.

If this is true then it is almost certain that he is correct. He almost certainly used some kind of IP evidence and if you are too cheap/stupid to use a VPN then your alts will easily be tied to your identity. Although there are two other potential/theoretical way that he could have made the connection if you tried using TOR with your scamming/extorting account, one would be that you dumb enough to ask for payment to an address that is connected to one of your known addresses, the other is something I'd rather not say

[peligro]

What was the extortion everyone keeps referencing to?

[shorena]

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=41911

His trust explains enough, he makes random assumptions.

He is doing a terrible job. He shall be removed. It's like putting a 5 year old in front of a big red button that says "Blow up the world". Not the best idea, right?

I am asking for justice and for the best of the forum.

Thanks,
Candy

I agree, all that trust-spam "scammer, gives unreasonable negative trust" without reference and insanly high amounts of "risked BTC" should get the user banned. I just wonder why you would ask for your own ban, just change your password and go.

[Welsh]

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=41911
His trust explains enough, he makes random assumptions.

You mean the 5 trusts you spammed? Also, the others are normally due to them being scamemrs. You can easily verify that by clicking on their profile and looking at their trust. Not that giving trust has anything to do with his moderating job here.

[LOBSTER]

Here's your sign

Better: