Bitcoin Forum
May 07, 2024, 06:42:29 AM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 27.0 [Torrent]
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  
Pages: [1]
  Print  
Author Topic: Pseudonimity compromised?  (Read 1170 times)
lebing (OP)
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1288
Merit: 1000

Enabling the maximal migration


View Profile
November 28, 2014, 06:13:45 AM
 #1

http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2014/11/141125074749.htm

My first thought is that this only applies for the desktop client, but even in this case is this valid?

Bro, do you even blockchain?
-E Voorhees
1715064149
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1715064149

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1715064149
Reply with quote  #2

1715064149
Report to moderator
No Gods or Kings. Only Bitcoin
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction.
1715064149
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1715064149

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1715064149
Reply with quote  #2

1715064149
Report to moderator
1715064149
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1715064149

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1715064149
Reply with quote  #2

1715064149
Report to moderator
1715064149
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1715064149

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1715064149
Reply with quote  #2

1715064149
Report to moderator
cbeast
Donator
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1736
Merit: 1006

Let's talk governance, lipstick, and pigs.


View Profile
November 28, 2014, 06:22:44 AM
 #2

It reveals IP addresses. That's still not entirely revealing. No doubt it will be counter-measured.

Any significantly advanced cryptocurrency is indistinguishable from Ponzi Tulips.
gmaxwell
Moderator
Legendary
*
expert
Offline Offline

Activity: 4158
Merit: 8382



View Profile WWW
November 28, 2014, 06:48:03 AM
 #3

The headline is kind of misleading.  I'm not sure that anyone who'd considered the subject thought they were at all private if they used the system without tor.  Bitcoin.org surely suggests no such thing.
lebing (OP)
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1288
Merit: 1000

Enabling the maximal migration


View Profile
November 28, 2014, 08:34:20 AM
 #4

The headline is kind of misleading.  I'm not sure that anyone who'd considered the subject thought they were at all private if they used the system without tor.  Bitcoin.org surely suggests no such thing.

Fair enough. The interesting part for me was Tor being easy to block. I have never heard that before. I guess I also found it surprising that it was worthy of a study at a cryptography/ security department.

Bro, do you even blockchain?
-E Voorhees
gmaxwell
Moderator
Legendary
*
expert
Offline Offline

Activity: 4158
Merit: 8382



View Profile WWW
November 28, 2014, 09:01:03 AM
 #5

The headline is kind of misleading.  I'm not sure that anyone who'd considered the subject thought they were at all private if they used the system without tor.  Bitcoin.org surely suggests no such thing.
Fair enough. The interesting part for me was Tor being easy to block. I have never heard that before. I guess I also found it surprising that it was worthy of a study at a cryptography/ security department.
We specifically added direct support for tor hidden services as one tool to deal with tor exit banning. HS inbound peers are not banned persistently.  Lots available to improve here, though at least tor is enough that you can't be screwed over without your help (E.g. turning tor off if you get dos attacked), for advanced users this is at least a basic level of capability.

Pages: [1]
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!