|
vuce (OP)
|
 |
June 16, 2012, 10:11:29 PM
Last edit: June 17, 2012, 01:57:49 AM by theymos |
|
If anyone does I would very much like to hear from you  (it's kind of important, as an answer I would need could turn a paper that is due tomorrow upside down) |
|
|
|
|
rjk
Sr. Member
 Offline
Activity: 448
Merit: 250
1ngldh
|
|
June 16, 2012, 11:01:05 PM |
|
Well I for one am not going to bother digging through all my addresses to see if it's in there, unless I have a good reason to. So maybe we could have a little bit of background on this request?
|
|
|
|
PocketCoin
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 23
Merit: 0
|
|
June 16, 2012, 11:02:11 PM |
|
Yeah this sounds like a waste of time to look considering i don't know what this has to do with turning in a paper
|
|
|
|
|
mb300sd
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1260
Merit: 1000
Drunk Posts
|
|
June 16, 2012, 11:04:00 PM |
|
|
1D7FJWRzeKa4SLmTznd3JpeNU13L1ErEco
|
|
|
|
vuce (OP)
|
|
June 16, 2012, 11:27:17 PM |
|
Yeah this sounds like a waste of time to look considering i don't know what this has to do with turning in a paper
The paper is on commitcoin implementation, which this double spend is a part of. If this is what I fear it is it might uncover a vulnerability in the protocol that authors shrug off as being practically unexploitable. Anyway it's not like someone could do this by accident so if you don't know you did it don't bother checking. |
|
|
|
|
|
finkleshnorts
|
|
June 16, 2012, 11:56:07 PM |
|
Yeah this sounds like a waste of time to look considering i don't know what this has to do with turning in a paper
The paper is on commitcoin implementation, which this double spend is a part of. If this is what I fear it is it might uncover a vulnerability in the protocol that authors shrug off as being practically unexploitable. Anyway it's not like someone could do this by accident so if you don't know you did it don't bother checking. sub sub |
|
|
|
|
|
vuce (OP)
|
|
June 17, 2012, 12:04:06 AM |
|
What's with all the sub comments? Anyway, after some thinking it's probably just an address collision due to my own stupidity. |
|
|
|
|
rjk
Sr. Member
Offline
Activity: 448
Merit: 250
1ngldh
|
|
June 17, 2012, 12:06:37 AM |
|
What's with all the sub comments? Anyway, after some thinking it's probably just an address collision due to my own stupidity. You mentioned a potential protocol vulnerability, so of course many people are interested. |
|
|
|
|
error
|
|
June 17, 2012, 12:07:29 AM |
|
What's with all the sub comments? Anyway, after some thinking it's probably just an address collision due to my own stupidity. People don't know they can click "Notify" at the bottom right to subscribe to the thread. |
3KzNGwzRZ6SimWuFAgh4TnXzHpruHMZmV8
|
|
|
|
vuce (OP)
|
|
June 17, 2012, 12:08:56 AM |
|
What's with all the sub comments? Anyway, after some thinking it's probably just an address collision due to my own stupidity. You mentioned a potential protocol vulnerability, so of course many people are interested. Just to make this clear, this is commitcoin protocol vulnerability, not bitcoin one. |
|
|
|
|
rjk
Sr. Member
Offline
Activity: 448
Merit: 250
1ngldh
|
|
June 17, 2012, 12:09:08 AM |
|
What's with all the sub comments? Anyway, after some thinking it's probably just an address collision due to my own stupidity. People don't know they can click "Notify" at the bottom right to subscribe to the thread. Ugh not this again. Here, have a link for your viewing pleasure: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=unreadreplies <-- that's why people "sub". They don't want an email from the Notify link. Just to make this clear, this is commitcoin protocol vulnerability, not bitcoin one.
Still interesting nonetheless. |
|
|
|
|
finkleshnorts
|
|
June 17, 2012, 11:27:32 PM |
|
What's with all the sub comments? Anyway, after some thinking it's probably just an address collision due to my own stupidity. People don't know they can click "Notify" at the bottom right to subscribe to the thread. Wow, why didn't I figured this out earlier? Thank you. No more subs from me. |
|
|
|
|
|
