|
WORE
|
 |
January 31, 2015, 05:48:17 PM |
|
OMG! No! .... No!!! Not the big red letters!!! Anything but those...
You a fan of The Christmas Story? First thing that pooped in my mind reading that. Harsh language sucks, but even worse with: BIG RED LETTERS! |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
It is a common myth that Bitcoin is ruled by a majority of miners. This is not true. Bitcoin miners "vote" on the ordering of transactions, but that's all they do. They can't vote to change the network rules.
|
|
|
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction.
|
|
|
|
|
goodtodeclare
Member
 Offline
Activity: 68
Merit: 10
|
|
January 31, 2015, 06:06:29 PM |
|
No fighting pleaze  .Let's talk about the future development of KHC. |
|
|
|
|
Riseman
|
|
January 31, 2015, 06:12:31 PM |
|
OMG! No! .... No!!! Not the big red letters!!! Anything but those...
You a fan of The Christmas Story? First thing that pooped in my mind reading that. Harsh language sucks, but even worse with: BIG RED LETTERS!I suppose neither color can possibly harm KHC right now. Not at the current price and volume |
|
|
|
|
goodtodeclare
Member
Offline
Activity: 68
Merit: 10
|
|
February 01, 2015, 11:18:54 AM |
|
KHC and cryptonight are the only 2 algos not cracked by ASIC and FPGA at present.
|
|
|
|
freezingwinter
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 32
Merit: 0
|
|
February 02, 2015, 01:56:46 AM |
|
Net hashrate has dropped below 10MH/s .  |
|
|
|
|
goodtodeclare
Member
Offline
Activity: 68
Merit: 10
|
|
February 02, 2015, 12:11:01 PM |
|
Net hashrate has dropped below 10MH/s . 11,180.00 KH/s now  |
|
|
|
|
cvaky
|
|
February 04, 2015, 07:52:33 AM |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
bitman008
|
|
February 04, 2015, 11:51:00 AM |
|
vote casted !  |
|
|
|
impressivecoin
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 23
Merit: 0
|
|
February 06, 2015, 02:30:20 AM |
|
Dev,please put this voting link on the op. |
|
|
|
|
horizontalcareer
Member
Offline
Activity: 93
Merit: 10
|
|
February 06, 2015, 02:35:07 PM |
|
Dev,please put this voting link on the op. Has dev gone ?  |
|
|
|
|
wr104 (OP)
|
|
February 06, 2015, 03:08:07 PM |
|
I'm here |
|
|
|
|
|
cvaky
|
|
February 06, 2015, 04:09:14 PM |
|
What about Android wallet ?
Is possible to make it ?
|
|
|
|
|
|
wr104 (OP)
|
|
February 06, 2015, 04:39:09 PM |
|
The Android wallet will come after the network transitions from KSHAKE320 version 1 to KSHAKE320 version 2.
Changing the algo itself isn't a big deal but, making the network to transition smoothly to the new algo version is a big task. So far, the work has been 10x greater than what I originally expected and I'm going to have to run few simulations in the testnet to ensure there won't be unpleasant surprises when the switch comes.
|
|
|
|
|
|
cvaky
|
|
February 06, 2015, 06:06:25 PM |
|
Thank you for info :-) . I am looking forward to new KSHAKE320 version 2. The Android wallet will come after the network transitions from KSHAKE320 version 1 to KSHAKE320 version 2.
Changing the algo itself isn't a big deal but, making the network to transition smoothly to the new algo version is a big task. So far, the work has been 10x greater than what I originally expected and I'm going to have to run few simulations in the testnet to ensure there won't be unpleasant surprises when the switch comes.
|
|
|
|
|
horizontalcareer
Member
Offline
Activity: 93
Merit: 10
|
|
February 07, 2015, 11:23:13 AM |
|
The Android wallet will come after the network transitions from KSHAKE320 version 1 to KSHAKE320 version 2.
Changing the algo itself isn't a big deal but, making the network to transition smoothly to the new algo version is a big task. So far, the work has been 10x greater than what I originally expected and I'm going to have to run few simulations in the testnet to ensure there won't be unpleasant surprises when the switch comes.
@wr104,Why does Android wallet need the network to transite from KSHAKE320 version 1 to KSHAKE320 version 2? What's the difference between KSHAKE320 version 1 and KSHAKE320 version 2? |
|
|
|
horizontalcareer
Member
Offline
Activity: 93
Merit: 10
|
|
February 07, 2015, 11:27:28 AM |
|
Are you developping Android wallet from the scratch ?
|
|
|
|
|
cvaky
|
|
February 09, 2015, 12:06:59 PM |
|
Is possible offer some bounty for logo ?
Because we still haven't got.
|
|
|
|
|
sine_fuc
Member
Offline
Activity: 62
Merit: 10
|
|
February 09, 2015, 12:59:31 PM |
|
Is possible offer some bounty for logo ?
Because we still haven't got.
I may donate some KHC for a nice logo. |
|
|
|
|
wr104 (OP)
|
|
February 09, 2015, 02:59:04 PM
Last edit: February 09, 2015, 11:46:43 PM by wr104 |
|
Why does Android wallet need the network to transite from KSHAKE320 version 1 to KSHAKE320 version 2?
What's the difference between KSHAKE320 version 1 and KSHAKE320 version 2?
It is better to wait for the network to transition to version 2 so, I don't have to worry about making substantial changes to yet another Wallet. After testing 4 candidates for the KSHAKE320v2 over last couple of weeks, I decided to go with the simplest change to the Algorithm. Simple is always the best, IMO. This new algorithm will only be 2% slower than version 1 in GPUs and yet, it will still work as a preemptive strike against possible future ASIC implementations by requiring more computing power to those choosing not to use RAM. Other algos I tested were pretty much forcing the usage of RAM but, they were as much as 40% slower than algo version 1. |
|
|
|
|
sine_fuc
Member
Offline
Activity: 62
Merit: 10
|
|
February 10, 2015, 01:25:59 AM |
|
Why does Android wallet need the network to transite from KSHAKE320 version 1 to KSHAKE320 version 2?
What's the difference between KSHAKE320 version 1 and KSHAKE320 version 2?
It is better to wait for the network to transition to version 2 so, I don't have to worry about making substantial changes to yet another Wallet. After testing 4 candidates for the KSHAKE320v2 over last couple of weeks, I decided to go with the simplest change to the Algorithm. Simple is always the best, IMO. This new algorithm will only be 2% slower than version 1 in GPUs and yet, it will still work as a preemptive strike against possible future ASIC implementations by requiring more computing power to those choosing not to use RAM. Other algos I tested were pretty much forcing the usage of RAM but, they were as much as 40% slower than algo version 1. Great! Thanks for your work ~ |
|
|
|
|
