Bitcoin Forum
March 29, 2024, 10:16:28 AM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 26.0 [Torrent]
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  

Warning: Moderators do not remove likely scams. You must use your own brain: caveat emptor. Watch out for Ponzi schemes. Do not invest more than you can afford to lose.

Pages: [1]
  Print  
Author Topic: Verification details on GLBSE..who has submitted what ?  (Read 1422 times)
Bitcoin Oz (OP)
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 686
Merit: 500


Wat


View Profile WWW
June 17, 2012, 10:30:32 AM
 #1

http://bitcoin.me/post/25285014822/who-has-submitted-verification-details-on-glbse#.T92wkvHbbRw

I went through all the companies listed on GLBSE and made a spreadsheet showing which companies have submitted verification details.

The results are interesting and bear further investigation on who is listing without supplying any details at all....I have noticed a couple of individuals with multiple listings who dont show any transparency at all.

1711707388
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1711707388

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1711707388
Reply with quote  #2

1711707388
Report to moderator
1711707388
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1711707388

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1711707388
Reply with quote  #2

1711707388
Report to moderator
"I'm sure that in 20 years there will either be very large transaction volume or no volume." -- Satoshi
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction.
1711707388
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1711707388

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1711707388
Reply with quote  #2

1711707388
Report to moderator
1711707388
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1711707388

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1711707388
Reply with quote  #2

1711707388
Report to moderator
1711707388
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1711707388

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1711707388
Reply with quote  #2

1711707388
Report to moderator
Ben Walsh (beamer)
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 343
Merit: 250



View Profile
June 17, 2012, 02:18:11 PM
 #2

Time for asset owners to justify there lack of transparency. I've got plenty more to invest when asset owners act to nullify some further risk for me.

VEscudero
Donator
Sr. Member
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 335
Merit: 250


Bitcoin, Ripple & Blockchain pioneer


View Profile WWW
June 17, 2012, 02:39:21 PM
 #3

I would love to have a similar spreadsheet and even better an official GLBSE hall of fame page showing exactly the same for verified investors.

https://www.vescudero.net   ★ VEscudero's Blog about cybersecurity, blockchain, bitcoin and open source ★
Dalkore
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1330
Merit: 1026


Mining since 2010 & Hosting since 2012


View Profile WWW
June 17, 2012, 03:21:09 PM
 #4

Time for asset owners to justify there lack of transparency. I've got plenty more to invest when asset owners act to nullify some further risk for me.



Our listing is almost ready, I will have an offering statement and I will be verified on GBLSE.  Also, before the launch, I encourage potential investors to setup conference calls so we can answer specific questions.

I agree with what your saying, from the beginning I knew being accessible and known would be a great benefit to the company and people wanted to see what we offer.


Dalkore

Hosting: Low as $60.00 per KW - Link
Transaction List: jayson3 +5 - ColdHardMetal +3 - Nolo +2 - CoinHoarder +1 - Elxiliath +1 - tymm0 +1 - Johnniewalker +1 - Oscer +1 - Davidj411 +1 - BitCoiner2012 +1 - dstruct2k +1 - Philj +1 - camolist +1 - exahash +1 - Littleshop +1 - Severian +1 - DebitMe +1 - lepenguin +1 - StringTheory +1 - amagimetals +1 - jcoin200 +1 - serp +1 - klintay +1 - -droid- +1 - FlutterPie +1
RandomQ
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 826
Merit: 500



View Profile
June 17, 2012, 11:42:18 PM
 #5

Thanks for the reminder. I only have 1 of 6 right now and I will submit all the rest tonight. And I hope others will do that same.
Nefario
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 602
Merit: 512


GLBSE Support support@glbse.com


View Profile WWW
June 17, 2012, 11:45:52 PM
 #6

I would love for an outside, specialised service to begin offering this.

PGP key id at pgp.mit.edu 0xA68F4B7C

To get help and support for GLBSE please email support@glbse.com
Bitcoin Oz (OP)
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 686
Merit: 500


Wat


View Profile WWW
June 18, 2012, 02:54:43 AM
 #7

I would love for an outside, specialised service to begin offering this.

+1 there is a need for it.

VEscudero
Donator
Sr. Member
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 335
Merit: 250


Bitcoin, Ripple & Blockchain pioneer


View Profile WWW
June 18, 2012, 05:39:29 AM
Last edit: June 18, 2012, 06:32:56 PM by vescudero
 #8

I would love for an outside, specialised service to begin offering this.

Sub

https://www.vescudero.net   ★ VEscudero's Blog about cybersecurity, blockchain, bitcoin and open source ★
Bitcoin Oz (OP)
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 686
Merit: 500


Wat


View Profile WWW
June 18, 2012, 09:17:58 AM
 #9

Is it time to start denying listings for people without verifiction ?

Sukrim
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2618
Merit: 1006


View Profile
June 18, 2012, 10:39:13 AM
 #10

No, but maybe it's time to only allow IPOs with a total initial share value of e.g. < 100 BTC for unverified assets. Yes, this can be circumvented by selling OTC, but then it's up to the users to check for identification of their trading partner.

Nefario, do you mean a web site that shows who is verified with you, or a service that actually does verification and it's results can be displayed on GLBSE?

There needs to be much stricter contracts to determine when such informations can be released for that (like missing a dividend payout for 48h for example) and the points in these contracts need to be verifiable with public knowledge, not only via GLBSE insider knowledge ("By the way, the issuer has not even logged in once since 4 months...").

https://www.coinlend.org <-- automated lending at various exchanges.
https://www.bitfinex.com <-- Trade BTC for other currencies and vice versa.
Ben Walsh (beamer)
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 343
Merit: 250



View Profile
June 18, 2012, 11:26:11 AM
 #11

Absolutely not.

There are obvious genuine reasons for not wanting to verify ...

Projects/businesses seeking funding for activities which are legally untested (or outright illegal) in the country of operation - remember Bitcoin itself falls into that category in many - e.g. now almost certainly Ethopia - http://allafrica.com/stories/201206180068.html.

One of the main reasons I am involved with Bitcoin is to ensure that the capital of everyone (not just the banksters, oligarchs, dictators ...) is able to flow freely - I would almost certainly withdraw my support of GLBSE should any such move be made.

I fully understand why GLBSE provides the optional service of verification for asset owners and actively encourage it - it is an essential means of maximising investor confidence and should be viewed by asset owners are a superb differentiator, however, it should never be made mandatory.

Is it time to start denying listings for people without verifiction ?
RandomQ
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 826
Merit: 500



View Profile
June 18, 2012, 07:03:58 PM
 #12

I would be willing to submit my details to a 3rd party and sign a contract saying they are allowed to release my info if I stole asset funds or if I defaulted and didn't sell off all assets to satisfy the debt to the stock holders.
Pages: [1]
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!