Bitcoin Forum
May 12, 2024, 08:17:56 AM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 27.0 [Torrent]
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  
Pages: [1]
  Print  
Author Topic: KOCHS LOBBY AGAINST TAX BREAKS FOR KOCH INDUSTRIES  (Read 689 times)
Wilikon (OP)
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1176
Merit: 1001


minds.com/Wilikon


View Profile
December 04, 2014, 01:24:57 AM
 #1




Libertarian philanthropists say cronyism is bad, even when they benefit from it


Conservative groups frequently derided as tools of powerful business interests are lobbying hard against a package of tax breaks for American businesses.

The company owned by billionaire philanthropists Charles and David Koch, as well as groups frequently associated with the fraternal libertarians, are pushing Congress to let 55 tax breaks expire, including several that provide billions in tax relief for corporations such as Koch Industries.

The various tax breaks are theoretically temporary, but have been consistently renewed. Together, they provide roughly $45 billion in tax relief to individuals and businesses each year.

House leaders expect the full package of tax extenders to pass despite opposition from conservative groups that either oppose tax preferences for specific industries or hope to see the various provisions considered individually.

“We oppose ALL subsidies, whether existing or proposed, including programs that benefit us, which are principally those that are embedded in our economy, such as mandates,” wrote Philip Ellender, president Koch’s government affairs division, in a Wednesday letter to members of Congress.

Ellender singled out the wind production tax credit as particularly deleterious. But unlike that provision, some of the tax breaks included in the House package benefit activities in which Koch and its subsidiaries are heavily invested.

Koch subsidiary George Pacific, for instance, qualifies for a tax break for the production of cellulosic biofuels. Another subsidiary, Flint Hills Resources, operates biofuel production facilities that could benefit from another of the provisions.

Those tax breaks could improve Koch’s bottom line, but the company sees federal tax preferences in general as economically harmful.

“Koch doesn’t view these as ‘benefits’ even if they are in industries we’re in,” explained a source familiar with the company’s public affairs strategy. “They are wasteful and market distorting, and allow other firms to run businesses that aren’t making money any other way.”

Americans for Prosperity, an influential conservative group with ties to the Kochs, suggested that the wind PTC is just such a provision.

“We just have a particular dislike for wind subsidies, since that sector has so little to show for the massive subsidies received over the past few decades,” Levi Russell, a spokesman for AFP, said in an email.

But like Koch Industries, he said, “we oppose corporate cronyism of all forms.” AFP is encouraging lawmakers to vote against the full package of tax extenders.

While Democratic lawmakers and members of the media insist that the Republican Party marches in lockstep with Koch Industries, whose owners are Republican donors, the tax extender package appears headed for passage despite opposition from Koch Industries, and that of groups with which it is associated.

The House likely will not split the package into stand-alone provisions that can be voted on individually, a position supported by Heritage Action for America, another prominent conservative group.

“Each provision should be allowed stand or fall on its own merit, and the vast majority of these provisions would not survive such scrutiny,” said Heritage Action spokesman Dan Holler in an emailed statement.

Pro-business groups such as the U.S. Chamber of Commerce support the package of tax extenders. Americans for Tax Reform, a group that works to minimize the American tax burden generally, also supports it.


http://freebeacon.com/issues/kochs-lobby-against-tax-breaks-for-koch-industries/


1715501876
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1715501876

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1715501876
Reply with quote  #2

1715501876
Report to moderator
1715501876
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1715501876

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1715501876
Reply with quote  #2

1715501876
Report to moderator
Remember that Bitcoin is still beta software. Don't put all of your money into BTC!
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction.
solid12345
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1246
Merit: 1000



View Profile
December 04, 2014, 02:53:59 AM
 #2

B..b..but Harry Reid said those Kochs are evil and corrupt!
BitMos
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 182
Merit: 123

"PLEASE SCULPT YOUR SHIT BEFORE THROWING. Thank U"


View Profile
December 04, 2014, 05:28:27 AM
Last edit: December 04, 2014, 05:44:27 AM by BitMos
 #3

I heard someone who lobbied for 0 corporate tax. He said that there were too many different rates, and that it would be an edge, and simplify everything for corporation. One sure thing is that tax reform is welcomed and coming. Why should corporations pay taxes? If the corporation pays tax the shareholders pay tax too and then again the shareholder is taxed once becoming customer. The more you tax an individual the less freedom he has with is buying power (for the better or the worst). The more the tax receivers spend the income of another individual, the higher the market distortion. It is because you bought a bridge that the shoemaker didn't made the BTC I wanted too sell him for his shoe. The shoe I could have bought him would have been enough for him to reach a threshold and do something. However since the buying power of me (as tax) was used to pay a bridge (to nowhere or not), I can't buy him my pair of shoe, he can't reach his threshold, he will not innovate the perfect shoes. Mankind lost the perfect shoe because of a bridge more (but it could be anything else)!

in short you are welcomed to help the "poor" but you don't have to force me to help you do it against my will, meaning that I may or may not have a personal and individual project that I want to do with my wallet. By taxing my wallet to death you kill all my project. Furthermore trying to hack into the wallet of someone against his will may lead the owner to strategize... And btw to solve any problems you need more than money, but skills... You need a certain level of value to attract a certain level of talent... Taking buying power from someone else pocket using coercive means isn't the best way to attract the best skills. Money needs the backing of the free will of the individual to be meaning full.

money is faster...
Pages: [1]
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!