Bitcoin Forum
May 07, 2024, 03:39:00 PM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 27.0 [Torrent]
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  
Pages: [1]
  Print  
Author Topic: Interesting reddit Post;- Physics and economics will [ensure] distributed mining  (Read 1019 times)
MineForeman.com (OP)
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 896
Merit: 1000



View Profile WWW
December 04, 2014, 08:46:39 PM
 #1

I got permission to post this on my blog but it is so good I thought I would share it here too;-

Every now and then I read something that I think is inspired.  In this instance I came across a post by reddit post by someone going by the handle of foolish_austrian.

His expertise and unique look on where bitcoin mining may be in the long term really captured my imagination and I thought readers may enjoy his far off vision of where mining may lead is in the future.  So, without any more from me, here is the [no so]foolish_austrian;-

Quote
“As someone who comes from a physics and engineering background, over the long run I’m not concerned with mining centralization. Physics will ensure it is distributed.

To qualify, I think there will be strong ebbs and flows while we catch up to Moore’s law. During the next few years, hardware is simply going to depreciate too quickly.

Around the year 2024, we are expected to hit the quantum mechanical limit, which broadly speaking means we will have perfected the silicon transistor to the atomic level. If we make them any smaller, they become transparent to matter. (Incidentally, I work on replacements for transistors that use the angular momentum of electrons to store data).

As we approach this limit, mining hardware is going to depreciate over years, not months. When this happens, the dynamics of mining investment will substantially change. Mining in Greenland with cheap energy and cool climate will actually be more expensive than decentralization. Actually, the profit from mining will go negative, Greenland mining will become impossible in it’s current form.

What mining does is convert electricity to heat, but not just any heat… specifically something between 90C to 120C, or heat around the boiling point of water. This heat density is too low for most industrial uses, except possibly things like water purification. It cannot be used for smelting, semiconductor processes, or anything that requires very high heat density without a heat pump.

As a result, what do you do with the enormous capacity to produce ~100C heat? For discussion sake, I’m going to address residential and industrial water heaters, although you could imagine other similar distributed use cases for small amounts of heat.

I just ran over to Sears website and checked the EnergyStar rating on water heaters, and found the average to be about $300/year. According to the US census there are approximately 115 million households in the United States. This means there is about a 34.5 Billion dollar market for electricity to heat conversion. Since 100C (semiconductor temperatures) is just about right to heat water to 55C, this is an absolutely natural market for bitcoin mining.

One could vaguely argue that with limited industrial uses and expanding worldwide, we could take the 34.5 Billion dollar market and multiply by about 5x to estimate the worldwide market. That puts the total market for heat conversion at just under 2 trillion.

Now for the economic argument. In a stable and predictable market (i.e. post superexponential growth), the profit from mining is going to be capped by the marginal cost of mining… ALWAYS. This means that anybody who can ‘recycle’ heat can afford a negative marginal cost, and therefore mine at a loss. The profit from mining will be negative. Simply speaking, approximately 2 Trillion dollars worth of heat can be produced in the mining of bitcoin, and ‘sold’ to the homeowner to heat water.

There are many possible incarnations of this, but we could imagine a water heater with a heater ‘rebate’. Electric power companies could act like mining pools. Since the marginal cost of mining for anyone not recycling heat is negative, the total profit from mining goes negative… It would require more than 2 Trillion dollars worth of electricity to be produced for free. (more than because of additional cooling costs required in a data center).

As a result, the mining centralization we see in Greenland and large data centers becomes enormously unprofitable. Any centralization of mining would REQUIRE heat recycling, which severely limits data centers and necessitates distribution unless you introduce heat pumps, which also increase cost.

So this leads to a new threat for centralization… mining pools operated by Electric Power companies. However, electricity production and distribution is inherently a geographically localized industry (you cannot cheaply transmit electricity across long distances). Therefore the number of power companies are likely to remain much much higher than the number of mining pools today. In addition, since nation-states distrust each other, Most want their own power generation. This makes at least 196 natural divisions.

Thankfully small amounts of heat is something that is needed every season, in every country, in every household worldwide. Data center heat is useless…

Also, 2 Trillion is a huge market for security :-)

Just my musings….”

Bitcoin News http://mineforeman.com/ || MinePeon - Bitcoin mining on the Raspberry PI http://mineforeman.com/minepeon/ || MinePeon Wiki http://minepeon.com/ || MinePeon Forums http://minepeon.com/forums/
1715096340
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1715096340

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1715096340
Reply with quote  #2

1715096340
Report to moderator
1715096340
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1715096340

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1715096340
Reply with quote  #2

1715096340
Report to moderator
"Bitcoin: mining our own business since 2009" -- Pieter Wuille
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction.
1715096340
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1715096340

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1715096340
Reply with quote  #2

1715096340
Report to moderator
Flashman
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 518
Merit: 500


Hodl!


View Profile
December 04, 2014, 08:56:27 PM
 #2

Yes, heat is another reason why mining will "re-decentralise" I have been telling people that just having enough power in one place will be an issue for further centralisation. Mines will have to seek out the power in scattered locations.

Anyone further interested in that new angular momentum tech should find some stuff searching for "spintronics"

TL;DR See Spot run. Run Spot run. .... .... Freelance interweb comedian, for teh lulz >>> 1MqAAR4XkJWfDt367hVTv5SstPZ54Fwse6

Bitcoin Custodian: Keeping BTC away from weak heads since Feb '13, adopter of homeless bitcoins.
lihuajkl
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1596
Merit: 1000


View Profile
December 05, 2014, 03:41:16 AM
 #3

Absolutely! How efficient the heat from mining will be recycled in the future will decide the level of profitability. Not long ago I read a similar post saying a company builts a heat recycling system from ASIC mining machine in the company's building instead of the existing heaters. It saves a lot of energy cost.
Q7
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 448
Merit: 250


View Profile WWW
December 05, 2014, 12:00:37 PM
 #4

Quote
Absolutely! How efficient the heat from mining will be recycled in the future will decide the level of profitability. Not long ago I read a similar post saying a company builts a heat recycling system from ASIC mining machine in the company's building instead of the existing heaters. It saves a lot of energy cost.

Now that is a very interesting idea. It could mean mining in certain countries where the amount of heat actually get wasted will have the miners lose out in terms of competition. While that has an effect on centralization, it could also mean that when production cost or rather mining cost gets lower, btc price should also go down? Let me ponder a while if i get this correctly.

Pages: [1]
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!